Here is where we agree, to disagree

, In my opinion can anyone
critique a image even though they might not be able to reproduce
it. I still value it, offcourse ill value it even more if the
person giving it have a example to prove his point even more.
Thanx for the compliment though.
Kindest
--
Regards
Paul L.
Good point on the above, just because one does not provide an image, does not mean the observation is invalid. Or the other way around either !
My take on this matter !
It is not clear to me what the hullaballoo is all about ????
This is Nikon SLR Lens Talk forum. Uncle Frank posted some pics he took !
Apparently one of the pictures evoked an emotional response, which is a great compliment to the photographer.
I know some who will pay 6k for a photo/painting rendition of their loved ones by average artisans, but will not pay 2k for a masterpiece painting original. The reason being, the subject is not of their loved one in the masterpiece paining (not unusual, the image of a masterpiece is a total stranger to most).. Apparently in this case, the subject is the reason for the decision and not the quality of the painting. Does that make the average artisan better than the master artisan who is acknowledged by the world to be one of the great painters. Does one have to paint a painting to prove this point.
I am a regular on the retouching forum, and it very common for all to post critiques of pics, like, too much yellow, too much red, blown highlights, no detail in shadows, green color cast, blue color cast, too much noise, or what have you. These are matters of fact, and no one debates this/or blows a fuse over it. This is how one learns how to improve. This is called Advise and Consent and Dissent.
I read the Op's posting, and he does not solicit critiques directly. However, I must say, despite what the Op says, there is an implied response solicited in any posting.
For example, the Op states this ... in the Title: The 85 F1.4 makes clients cry ....
This to me implies, despite what the Op says, that the 85 F1.4 is a great lens, and that one should consider buying it, and it is for this reason the Op is posting those pics.
Further this is the lens forum, so it is also implied, that those who like the picture can post their opinions in favor of the lens and/or the picture. In the same vein, those who view the picture in bad light will also post their opinions of disfavor of the lens and/or the picture. Please note that one cannot isolate the picture from the lens. The lens is what enabled the image, and further it is posted in Nikon SLR Lens Forum.
If the operator does not want a critique, he should say in bold capital letters "NO CRITIQUES PLEASE".
Regards to all !
Btw, I am new to digital by a few months, and still cannot get the hang of it, I keep blowing out highlights, which I never did in Film. However, I have thousands and thousands of great film images !