colourgeek
Senior Member
No kidding. But you're wrong. If the intentions of HP were purely financial they would have given you a lot larger gamut and much less stable.Oh come on now Neil.....HP is not in this for philantrophy, they
are in this to make a profit. Period. And Yes so is Epson.
IF you'd read my posts you wouldn't have to try to create such statements.Yes the B8910 may be a breath of fresh air. But its not the whole
atmosphere.
It doesnt make the 4800 or any of the other stellar printers any
less than they were yesterday and they still make wonderful prints
etc...
See the above > READ my posts . What I say I stand by. And hype is not something that interests me, yet innovation does.With all the 8910 hype you have been delivering for HP as a
consultant over the last few months on this and other websites it a
wonder that is not the 'perfect' printer.
I don't work in marketing, nor often believe in what they are saying. Yet a business couldn't survive without marketing. For me a printer that can make museum quality B&W fine art prints forI did not see any marketing statements from HP that indicates this
is a ho hum printer.
No I have never used that language. I never will either. I dwell on what is good in each device. Again READ my posts, I have lots of good things to say about each brand.You have been touting this new HP printer as the greatest thing
since sliced bread...and that can be said for many of the wonderful
printers that HP, Canon and Espon has produced in the past...
We've gone through this before. I've been doing what I can with more than just HP to further the collaboration of photography and manufacturers/developers of colour IT products for many years.I am beginning to feel your just a bit biased towards HP, could
this be?????
I've been invited to do testing often with HP, which is not paid one cent BTW (no beta tester has ever been paid by HP), and that's the way it is. Some have time or make their living writing, or selling something that is parallel to testing and reviews. I don't. Yet the more intimately I know these products the better I can share the info trusted to me by the engineers and scientists, equally the other direction is true , the eng. departments need photographers feedback. A handful of people do this with Epson and Canon too.
PS it's the 9180 and I don't know what you're talking about in the above terms!I hope "ALL" the printer manufacturers continue to come out with
their breath of fresh air printers so we all benefit......
But to poo-pooh the "new printer' from Espon over the HP 8910 tells
me your taking sides here!!!
Alex I couldn't care less if you ever do. I'm not waiting for approval of your opinions, nor mine , and since I'm the one with the test equipment and can satisfy my curiosity on digital equipment. I share what I believe in . By doing so there will always be hecklers and opposition. Sometimes there is good to come out of opposing posts , as we all can learn from knowledgeable posts.Please dont take this the wrong way Neil, I respect your technical
abilities but I will reserve judgement when "I" see the prints off
of these printers before I spend my hard earned dollars on either
or both of these printers.
But this one is just hacking. Enough said.
Neil Snape photographer Paris http://www.neilsnape.com