E3 new pic

It has a 3 bar espresso machine built in? You need some water for
that feature!

Could explain why it's so big???
Now THAT'S an idea! (As I sit here and down my 4th cup of coffee this morning!)

--
Living in a Fisheye Lens,
Caught in the Camera Eye,
I Have No Heart to Lie;
I Can't Pretend a Stranger
is a Long-awaited Friend.

--Neil Peart

http://www.gtcraigphoto.com
 
yes, it was a specuation on this forum about a three sensor Olympus, one for each color chanel.
--
http://huzururmuz.blogspot.com
Looking for my first dslr
 
In all seriousness, while I can understand some people wanting a
small and/or light body (and hey ... you lucky people have got the
ULTIMATE in that in the E400 very soon!), other scenarios are
helped by having a big bad camera that screams 'pro'.
I'm not denigrating your preference for a big camera here, but I can't understand why you chose Olympus in that case.

The whole point of the E-system is greater compactness. In every other way, competitive systems have the same basic potential as the E-system, and, in some ways, greater potential.

So why not get a Nikon or Canon pro body? They're plenty big, the Canons especially -- certainly more impressive in the "I'm a big pro body" kind of way than an E-1 could ever be.
 
Iy does not look so big to me, but I wil speculate anyway.

Maybe as rumored (by Joe Wisniewski for one), this will have a high quality EVF up there instead of an OVF.

Or as someone else already said, the second small CCD for live view mode A on the LCD is in there.
 
Maybe they'll make a normal size version of this thing for us ordinary

folks. I think Gareths' comments about big being impressive for pros are well taken, but for my money I'd still like something smaller. Smaller even than the E-1 but with the E-1 quality. Maybe they'll do like Nikon and make this big bruiser their flagship, but come out with a much smaller camera for the "Advanced Amateur" or a "Pro Back-Up". That's what I'd like.
--
BJM
 
The whole point of the E-system is greater compactness.
I don't think that is the whole point. The point was that the E-System was developed from the ground up with no legacy strings attached.

Smaller size is a side effect of the redesign. The smaller size is not what prompted the redesign. The redesign prompted a smaller size.

Sure, smaller size is one of the points...I would not build my entire campaign on that point given that many Oly cameras are no smaller than their counterparts.
 
Maybe they'll make a normal size version of this thing for us ordinary
folks.
if you read the Oly president very recent announcement on the jp website, he seems to be stating that they are going to cater for ALL sectors. Good news all around if you ask me :-)

I actualy like the ability to have the power grip detachable. Its a great thing a lot of the time and a great big thing in the way the rest of the time! The ability to take in on and off is fantastic.

The one thing that a big body does give you is that having all that rear real estate allows you to have a large screen, lots of (useable) buttons, LCD status display etc.
 
if you read the Oly president very recent announcement on the jp
website, he seems to be stating that they are going to cater for
ALL sectors. Good news all around if you ask me :-)
Quote:
*********************

Our future product plans include everything from a flagship model aimed at working professionals, to entry-level models for users who are new to SLR photography. We will continue to develop Olympus E-System bodies, lenses, and accessories for a wide range of genres, so that even more people are able to take photographs that could never be taken before.

Digital SLR systems play a key role in our business plans. We are currently strengthening our development resources in this area, and are working to bring even more products to market. We assure you there will be successors to the E-1 constantly, and the Olympus E-System and the Four Thirds System will continue to grow.

Masaharu Okubo
President, Olympus Imaging Corporation

**********************
 
I saw a chart here on this forum recently and the E1 has the
highest magnification of all the DSLR's, but the actual area in the
viewfinder was around the same as the 20D. The 1Ds MII has twice
the area and the 5D have a 50% increase.
But magnification specs are confusing, aren't they? Sometimes quoted with a reference actual focal length (like 50mm) which, depending on crop factor, renders different field of view on different cameras. Should be quoted at a standard 35mm equivalent focal length I think (and yet aspect ratio messes that up slightly too). I was under the impression that the E-1 had the most magnification of the current E-system cameras but still lower (at equalized FOV) than other systems.
 
I was under the impression that the E-1 had the most
magnification of the current E-system cameras but still lower (at
equalized FOV) than other systems.
Yes. In such a comparison, the E-1 has a magnification of 0.5, whereas the better DSLR viewfinders are in the 0.6-0.7 range. I've put a 1.2x magnifier onto my viewfinder to get 0.6 equivalent.

Cheers,
Simon
 
What did you mean E1rs? what is that and can you link to that picture?
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top