Backpacks....

SORRY !!!!

I use this for long walks as it gives

http://www.lowepro.com/Products/Backpacks/notebook_camera/CompuRover_AW.aspx

1/ room for clothes
2/ AW protection
3/ reasonably easy access for camera equipment

then when the sun shines and i wa nt to be light

http://www.tamrac.com/welcome.htm

this is great. you can swing it round .. no room for other stuff and sometimes a little difficult to draw out camera ..... its a bit like the sling shot

written in haste so if these are repeats apologies!!!

--
Tom Bell
Dartmooor
Devon
UK
 
I have the Lowepro Rover Plus AW. It's the biggest they have that is within carry-on luggage limits and has significant storage room for non-photography stuff.

The lower compartment has 6 divisions that each allow for a f/2.8 telezoom to be stored. In practice:
  • one holding the camera with standard zoom pointing down.
  • one with the telezoom
  • one next to the camera for one not too big lens
  • the remaining three can hold either: one flash / two small primes/TCs stacked / drive / charger / ...
I generally have the drive in the upper compartment in an additional pouch.

The upper compartment is sufficiently large to hold a change of clothes, washing gear, book as well as some photog stuff that doesn't require padding.

Too big for quick access though...

Wim

--
Belgium, GMT+1

 
Just read though other replies and saw the remarks on tripod storage.

The Lowepro Rover Plus AW has straps on the outside to hold a tripod, but that makes the pack much larger to carry. I generally open the separator between upper and lower compartment a bit near the back and manage to put a monopod (without head) in there. The head goes in whatever compartment still has room.

Wim

--
Belgium, GMT+1

 
For the neat small option my linlk was wrong. limited but convenient ... camera there for the grabbing

http://www.tamrac.com/welcome.htm

Having got there look at Velocity 7 / 8/ 9
--
Tom Bell
Dartmooor
Devon
UK
 
Right now I use the Tamrac Adventure 8 (5248). Its camera compartment holds:

DS
18-55
50-200
100 Macro
50 f1.4
2 teleconverters (or flash)
cokin filters/rings/holder
SD cards/reader & cables, lens cleaning stuff, blower, etc.
small tripod strapped to bottom

The top section is good for jacket/food (or more camera gear - but only with padded lens case etc. since this section is not padded). The outer mesh nicely holds a 16-20 oz water bottle for easy access.

They have lots of different size bags/packs for different amounts of gear.

Lots of use for one year - its held up very well.
--
Jim Harrison

'You can see a lot, just by looking.'
 
Contents, at the moment:

bottom compartment:
DL+sigma 17-70 (attached)
SMC F 70-210
SMC M 50/1.7
flash
rocket blower

upper compartment:
batteries+charger
SD cards
lens tissue
and there is room for left for more stuff

--
Gerard
 
I recently bought a Amvona model AB-1626 backpack. I got it because it was the right size and about 1/3 the price of a Tamrac or LowePro. The build quality is equal the name brands except for the velcro attachments inside, which are not as sticky. It is big enough to hold evey piece of Pentax gear I own plus a monopod on the side. The gear inside the main compartment includes:

300/4, 50-200. 15-45. 50/1.4, 24/28, 17-55, 135/2.5, 21/3.2, leitz TT tripod, 2 Quantum bantum power packs, 2 sunpak strobes, K-100D, 15 filters.

I liked the 1626 so much I bought the smaller AB-1619 for day-trips and airline travel. It holds almost as much, but has fewer outside pockets and no tripod attachments, but fits under an airline seat.
--
Steven Stone
Contributing Editor Ultimate A/V Magazine
Columnist EnjoytheMusic.com
Columnist Vintage Guitar Magazine
[email protected]
 
Body, 5 lenses (from 14 mm thru A* 300), flash, tripod, an assorment of filters and other accessories, and enough space in the lower comparment for clothes, water and a meal or two.

I'm not sure they're made any more, but for a true backcountry backpack, this thing has been wonderful.

-Greg
 
who uses em.....what have u got and what can it hold?
I have a Lowepro CompuTrekker AW. It holds laptop and a MASSIVE amount of photo gear (lessee: Canon 10D plus 300/4L IS + 20 + 28 + 50 + 100 lenses with hoods, power supply and batteries, flash, memory cards, Panasonic FZ 10 plus charger plus cards plus remotes and tripod adapters, plus various filters plus carries the tripod in a built in holder ....)

It's a great bag. Larger than I normally need, however. On last year's trip, an *ist DS and six lenses plus spares and tripod accessories barely made a dent in its capacity.

Godfrey
 
Mountainsmith Parallax -- I just purchased it a few weeks before my annual trip to Rocky Mountain National Park. I had been using a Gregory regular backpackers pack and I had been afraid to switch to some of these dedicated camera packs for fear it wouldn't carry the weight as well. That fear was unfounded and the Parallax is the most convenient pack of any kind I've ever used.

On this particular trip, it carried:
*istDS body with kit lens
MX body with 24mm lens
F70-210 lens
A50/1.7 lens
lunch = sandwich, chips, nuts and cookies
raingear
Manfrotto magfiber tripod with ball head
2 Nalgene water bottles
filters
cable release for MX
gloves
hat

And there was room to SPARE! Specifically, I probably could've fit 2 more mid-sized lenses with all of that or perhaps 3 smallish ones.

It has a built-in rainfly which is nearly perfect except that it doesn't cover adequately if the tripod is mounted on the back of the pack. However, the access to the main interior compartments is through the back of the pack so if the rainfly is up and you want in there, it can still be done without removing the rainfly. The rainfly is removable for washing.

All straps can be hidden. I added a tamarac backpack strap to the shoulder straps so I could keep my DS body handy.

There is a small waist pouch that can be removed, but is ideal for filters, remotes, bubble levels, kleenex (I get sniffley sometimes), or memory cards.

It has a padded laptop sleeve (which I didn't use, but I probably will this weekend).

I tried it side-by-side with about half a dozen packs at Central Camera in Chicago. The runner-up was a Lowepro, but I didn't like the tripod mount, and the beefier padding on the straps seemed like overkill. The only advantage I felt the Lowepro had was that it carried all of the wieght closer to the body--in other words, the Mountainsmith sticks-out pretty far which might be better for someone with a bad back or weak shoulders. This is especially true if you mount the tripod to the holder on the back. My pod has a very convenient handle, so I frequently carried it instead. But the Lowepro's tripod mount was more clunky to me and it doesn't appear to have nearly the capacity or convenience overall. I am a 130lb 5' 9" weakling and I carried it full of the above items for hikes of up to 9.2 miles with a couple thousand feet elevation gain while it was raining, so I think most people would be very comfortable with this pack.

Trying hard to find additional faults, I might prefer some extra different-sized foam inserts for customizing the main interior a little more, but the standard ones definately served the purpose.

In retrospect, I only have one regret: that I didn't buy this pack several years ago.

Happy packing!

Steve
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top