Um, what exactly did I comprehend incorrectly?
--
dpreview & pbase supporter
http://www.pbase.com/digirob
Reading mode:
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
-
Welcome to the new forums! Please read this first. For known issues we are working to resolve, click here.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Alternative to Canon Wireless Transmitter
- Thread starter MarkTrueman
- Start date
--
dpreview & pbase supporter
http://www.pbase.com/digirob
AperturePro
Senior Member
http://www.eye.fi/index.htm
Might this be a good solution? Depending on the price, it should prove
interesting with GB of storage and wifi transmission too? I didn't find
a wifi range, but certainly within a studio. A quick confirm of data reaching
the computer or PDA and you can delete and go on working.
Might this be a good solution? Depending on the price, it should prove
interesting with GB of storage and wifi transmission too? I didn't find
a wifi range, but certainly within a studio. A quick confirm of data reaching
the computer or PDA and you can delete and go on working.
PalmsWestPhoto
Forum Pro
lets ask what where you able to comprehend ...Um, what exactly did I comprehend incorrectly?
here is what i posted
-------------------------------------
if you have a 802.11g connection and the connection is perfect (54Mbps) i would guess you would get a data transmission rate of about half that
-------------------------------------
here is what you posted
------------------------------------
Wi-fi inefficiency is considerable. 54m/bit wi-fi is a lot less than 1/2 the speed of 100m/bit wired ethernet.
------------------------------------
hmmm, can you read it NOW or do i have to break it down into words ?
--
Michael Salzlechner
http://www.PalmsWestPhoto.com
Anthony Ball
Well-known member
If you buy a omnidirectional 15di antenna you get a good extension of range in all directions. The booster should extend it even further. Typical access points have 2-4dbi antennas. Of course.. you have to make sure the access point has a removable antenna... my Linksys does but my Netgear doesn't.
They also make wireless repeaters that you can put in various places to extend your range, but you will need a power supply for those. Of course, they let you work around obstacles by careful positioning.
There are outdoor access points around... a little more expensive, but weather sealed and with power over ethernet. Basically you run a Cat5 cable
up to 100 meters (I think) and power and network run over the same cable.
Lots of solutions. You may spend 1000-2000 dollars to get something that really covers all your needs, but you can probably get away with a 500 dollar investment that will work in most cases.
Even just the 15dbi antenna for 150 dollars will make quite a difference.
They also make wireless repeaters that you can put in various places to extend your range, but you will need a power supply for those. Of course, they let you work around obstacles by careful positioning.
There are outdoor access points around... a little more expensive, but weather sealed and with power over ethernet. Basically you run a Cat5 cable
up to 100 meters (I think) and power and network run over the same cable.
Lots of solutions. You may spend 1000-2000 dollars to get something that really covers all your needs, but you can probably get away with a 500 dollar investment that will work in most cases.
Even just the 15dbi antenna for 150 dollars will make quite a difference.
You're certainly a rude w@nker aren't you? I did not read the earlier message, you stupid git, or I would not have said that. Please give me enough credit to know how to bloody read.
How about this:
"Yes at 54 it is acceptable. The transmitter can do wireless G and/or B IN ADDITION TO wired ethernet at 100Mbps"
or this:
"Yes at 54 it is acceptable. The transmitter can do wireless G and/or B AND CAN ALSO DO wired ethernet at 100Mbps"
Not nearly as ambiguous.
Any why come out shooting in the first place? All I said was, in short, if your wireless is performing the same as your wired eithernet, then your ethernet is poory configured. Obviously, I misunderstood what you were saying. But as I said, it can be interpreted either way.
--
dpreview & pbase supporter
http://www.pbase.com/digirob
This statement can be just as easily interpreted as saying that "wireless performs the same as wired". It can also be interpreted as saying it can do wireless IN ADDITION TO wired ethernet. Perhaps you ought to be more accurate and concise in your statements lest you be misunderstood.Yes at 54 it is acceptable. The transmitter can do wireless G
and/or B as well as wired ethernet at 100Mbps
How about this:
"Yes at 54 it is acceptable. The transmitter can do wireless G and/or B IN ADDITION TO wired ethernet at 100Mbps"
or this:
"Yes at 54 it is acceptable. The transmitter can do wireless G and/or B AND CAN ALSO DO wired ethernet at 100Mbps"
Not nearly as ambiguous.
Any why come out shooting in the first place? All I said was, in short, if your wireless is performing the same as your wired eithernet, then your ethernet is poory configured. Obviously, I misunderstood what you were saying. But as I said, it can be interpreted either way.
--
dpreview & pbase supporter
http://www.pbase.com/digirob
PalmsWestPhoto
Forum Pro
Dumbest excuse i ever heard. Essentially you opened your mouth faster than you can use your pea brain ...You're certainly a rude w@nker aren't you? I did not read the
earlier message, you stupid git, or I would not have said that.
right , ...Please give me enough credit to know how to bloody read.
Right, .... in lala land maybe ...This statement can be just as easily interpreted as saying thatYes at 54 it is acceptable. The transmitter can do wireless G
and/or B as well as wired ethernet at 100Mbps
"wireless performs the same as wired". It can also be interpreted
Perhaps you should quit making dumb comments if you cant make sure you are correct first ...Perhaps you ought to be more accurate and concise in your
statements lest you be misunderstood.
And all i said was that your reading comprehension is not quite what it should be. So why do you get your panties all wet just because i state a fact ?Any why come out shooting in the first place? All I said was, in
short, if your wireless is performing the same as your wired
eithernet, then your ethernet is poory configured. Obviously, I
misunderstood what you were saying. But as I said, it can be
interpreted either way.
--
Michael Salzlechner
http://www.PalmsWestPhoto.com
PalmsWestPhoto
Forum Pro
Keyboard shortcuts
- f
- Forum
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.