Hehe...You are wrong there. They are busy designing another bunch of 'A' & ixus series, & futher confusing consumers while keeping them away from real cameras.
Zzzz--taking a well-deserved nap on their big bed stuffed with cash! Going by Amazon's top selling list, Canon is in pretty good shape.
That would be interesting. I wonder what sensor it would use. I assume the Pro1 used a Sony sensor. Maybe they'll do something to go against the Sony DSC-R1, and they'd probably use their own sensor in that case. I'd love something like the R1 but with OIS and a good video feature. They've thoroughly refreshed their tiny-sensor-camera line-up with the possible exception of a smaller zoom camera to compete with Panasonic's TZ1.
Yet Canon still makes the BEST cameras.
--
snip
the Betamax syndrome ? although technically much better than VHS the masses wanted to choose it over Betamax pushed by some huge advertising industry .. it left Betamax on the scrap heap .. sales figures do not necessarily relate to gear quality .. (.. and my very first SLR was a Yashica ..)
I'm not concerned about marketshare or profits Canon have, but only about their lineup. I know they want to push us into dslr territory, which I don't want to go into so my wish is related to newer models in G/Pro/S series.
Of course Not, but again, what I want to see are some guenuine diffrences where model line ups are concerned. I was using A60 for more than 3 yrs & now bought Fuji E550 refurb, just for the matter of price worth features. I was heading towards G series but didn't see that coming.
I also have good belief in Canon or let's say faith in them so I am more eager to see some distinguished models from them, not just 'me too' ones. Talk about compacts now, Fuji have better noise control, Minolta/Panasonics follow image stabiization. What individual feature Canon share on their cameras, I wonder?
Same here.
