Finaly someone else with some sence.
Gee, "finaly"(sic)...two guys with sense! So much"sence"(sic) that one of their contributions include characterizing another member as "a spoiled-child", because he was not happy with a vendor's service and said-so.
You are a spoiled child and you need to calm down.
Sincerely
Michael
PS. I usually don't get this upset but I think that causing someone
to loose business is a serious matter.
Thanks guys, for helping keep-the-lid-on-the-flames around here . If you want to get personal, it seems that you both have the same "rediculous" (sic) spelling-coach, ...dump him! (Hey, I make spelling-errors, too. But this was an interesting coincidence. Are there really two guys here, or is it just one, patting-himself on the back? I know, ...check the "profiles". Nah, too-much trouble!)
So why get personal like this? Good question. I'll stop here. How 'bout you?
Yes, causing someone to lose business can be a serious matter. The question becomes WHO is doing the "causing"?
However, with the kind of volume they do, some things will go wrong
and errors will happen. The issue here is what's their general
policy on returned or open merchandise. A fair evaluation would
include B&H's official policy statement on the issue. Anyone know
what it is?
--Michael Porter
Thanks M.P., for a more rational position.
While past-laurels are nice, and may be well-deserved, today's customers have a right to be thinking "That was then, and this is now!".
"Accidents" and "mistakes", do occur, and it is human-enough to make them.
But WHEN they DO happen, frustration and disappointment result, and disappointed, frustrated customers are not as likely to be repeat customers (OR to speak-well of the vendor).
So vendors (usually) try to control/minimize this occurance via service(quality)-control. When (if) a vendor becomes so "successful " that it is too-busy to tend to the service concerns, then it has simply gotten too-big-for-it's-britches, ...and a "slap-upside-the-head" by means of negative publicity will likely occur, to keep it headed in the right-direction.
Rightly so!
A customer has a right to expect service "as-advertised". If he does not get it, he HAS been "lied-to", accidentally-or-not, and has a right to "*****". There is nothing wrong with expecting someone's word to be-their-bond, although it may not be always realistic in the often-shady world of mail-order(PARTICULARLY photographic) business.
B&H may well be one of the best. If so, they should appreciate the heads-up being given by the SEVERAL recent posts from less-than-happy customers.
If they are too-busy to care, the publicity may slow things down a little, ...and THEN they can get their ducks-in-a-row.
Meanwhile, the "policy" info that M.P. mentioned can help everyone know what-to-expect, at-least.
Re. "opened boxes". This is a valid concern, although it admittedly puts vendors in a potential bind if they permit no-penalty examine/return privileges.
An item can be dropped and damaged(with NO "apparent" harm), ever-so-slightly mis-aligning elements, and creating sub-spec performance that the next-customer may-not (probably will-not) be equipped to test-for, and may not "notice". (Duh! why do they pack this stuff in "cushioning" foam?)
Todays equipment, especially at the level usually discussed on this forum is expensive, precision stuff. Customers have a right to be concerned that when they pay for it, ...they GET it. WITH all the expected performance.
For most-of-them, the only assurance they will have that they have "gotten it", is the integrity of the vendor.
It behooves the vendor to tend to their reputation for having this integrity.
Discussions such as this (and several other) threads may prompt them to keep this in-mind.
If the reports are TRUTHFUL, the reporter has met his obligation. The vendor meets his, by minimizing the incidence of reports.
(All MHO, of course!)
Larry
Walt
This nitpicking is rediculous.
A company as large as B&H processes countless orders a day. I am
positive that if you recieved an open lens that it was purely by
accident.
And even so there was nothing wrong with the lens, yet you still
wasted your time returning it. You then come on a public message
board and bad mouth a legitimate business because of a fingerprint
on a waranty card, causing them to loose business.
Frankly I think B&H would have been better off if you had bought
the lens elsewhere.
You are a spoiled child and you need to calm down.
Sincerely
Michael
PS. I usually don't get this upset but I think that causing someone
to loose business is a serious matter.