This week's CNET poll shows only 15% believe film is dead

your choice of words and your opinions that you are pushing as fact
still puts you in the 'idiot post' category.
I can't argue with logic like that....
 
Why celebrate the death of film?
Who is celebrating? Why do the "defenders of film" always assume
that digital people WANT film to die?

People are just reporting. It is more like the doctor is looking at
the ekg machine and saying they are seeing the lines go flat rather
than someone dancing on the coffin.
Well put.

I certainly don't celebrate the passing of film from the only way
to take a picture to a secondary way. (Neither do I morn it
either, to be honest.)

I'm just amazed at how quickly the switch occurred. I would have
predicted at least twice as long.

We are living in amazing times. Look at what has happened in the
last decade or two. Just start by thinking about personal
computers and the internet....
Film is great. It just isn't great enough for a lot of people.
Yes. Film still does everything just as well as it ever did. And
it may improve some more.

And that's fine too.

--
bob

The Blind Pig Guild
A photo/travel club looking for members
http://www.jeber.com/Clubs/Blind-Pig/

Flowers of Asia
A photo club for appreciators of Asian flowers - looking for members
http://www.jeber.com/Clubs/Flowers-of--Asia/

Travel Galleries
http://www.pbase.com/bobtrips
Like I said, ask photographers if they still use b&w film...you will find a lot that do. The line isnt flat, its fallen, but still there. People report poor information....
 
they are seeing the lines go flat rather
than someone dancing on the coffin.
Like I said, ask photographers if they still use b&w film...you
will find a lot that do. The line isnt flat, its fallen, but still
there. People report poor information....
I said "going" which implies it is heading in a direction, so that would be about the same as you are saying. I also think that film will never die. It just isn't going to be an 18 or even a 45 year old anytime soon. Doesn't mean it won't be around. People will keep it alive.

As for people reporting poor information I assume that you are talking about the big film and paper manufacturers like Kodak, Agfa, Fuji, Ilford and the like. Yeah, you are right. They are probably lying about their sales. I wish they wouldn't do that.
 
they are seeing the lines go flat rather
than someone dancing on the coffin.
Like I said, ask photographers if they still use b&w film...you
will find a lot that do. The line isnt flat, its fallen, but still
there. People report poor information....
I said "going" which implies it is heading in a direction, so that
would be about the same as you are saying. I also think that film
will never die. It just isn't going to be an 18 or even a 45 year
old anytime soon. Doesn't mean it won't be around. People will keep
it alive.

As for people reporting poor information I assume that you are
talking about the big film and paper manufacturers like Kodak,
Agfa, Fuji, Ilford and the like. Yeah, you are right. They are
probably lying about their sales. I wish they wouldn't do that.
This isn't a new trend, nor is it entirely due to digitization. Something like 18 years ago, the one shop doing b&w developing in the tiny town near me quit doing developing and contacts, so I had to set up my own b&w darkroom (about 98% of my work then was b&w). About five years ago, the only alternative (a 70 mile round trip away anyway), sold out to Ritz, which doesn't do b&w in any way, shape or form, AFAICT. Fortunately, about seven years ago, I started going digital. About six years ago, I sold off my darkroom gear and tore down the walls. I never did like the stink, anyway, and today, and even six years ago, most work has switched to color.
--
Charlie Self
http://www.charlieselfonline.com
 
Not dead...just ask the film companies and the camera manufacturers. Fil cameras and film sales are up...the future looks bright!

Now Mr. Gecko asks "When is something dead? If there is one film sale is it not dead?

The question is really too broad and subject to different interpretations.

R
--
See Mr. Gecko full size at:
http://www.pbase.com/rickdecker/image/61996346

See Sigma Lens Tests At:
http://www.lightreflection.com/sigmalenstests/matrix.htm



Powered by Sigma......
Empowered by Foveon

http://www.lightreflection.com
http://www.silveroaksranch.com
http://www.pbase.com/rickdecker
 
Personally, what I care about is which tool will allow me to obtain the best picture possible in most of the situations I will encounter. I don't much care whether it be digital, film or a paintbrush in my mouth with my hands tied behind my back.

The question here isn't which medium yanks at your heart strings, but which medium provides the best picture possible? For example if I want to take a low light pic, which will be less grainy? A canon drebelxt at iso 1600 or the best film can offer.

And before you say it, yeah the drebel made me do it.
 
I live ina "third world country", in Medellin, Colombia S.A. Although a third world country, Medellin is a very modern city. We have three major photography chains in Colombia, all take in film and digital to be processed. In this regard, I AM THE WIERDO because instead of ordering prints from my 35 mm rolls, I have the film developed and high res scanned and placed on a cd. It costs me $2.50 for a cd with 4,000 dpi filesfrom a 36 ex. roll.

When I go to the store to leave off my film to be digitized, they take in ten times as many 35 mm rolls for prints than they do cards with digi files, at least while I'm there. South America tends to lag behind the U.S. and Europe by about 2 to 4 years in technology. Until we catch up, the film business is thriving.
--

' You don't have to have the best of everything to get the best out of what you do have'.
 
South America tends to
lag behind the U.S. and Europe by about 2 to 4 years in technology.
Until we catch up, the film business is thriving.
Interesting. Any idea why?

Since Japan and Singapore were such early players in technology digital photography, etc. has spread more rapidly through the SEA countries.

Could it be the lack of any major technology centers?

--
bob

The Blind Pig Guild
A photo/travel club looking for members
http://www.jeber.com/Clubs/Blind-Pig/

Flowers of Asia
A photo club for appreciators of Asian flowers - looking for members
http://www.jeber.com/Clubs/Flowers-of--Asia/

Travel Galleries
http://www.pbase.com/bobtrips
 
No, wait, that would be Nietzschefication.

;)

--
The Pistons led the NBA, and lost in the playoffs.
The Red Wings led the NHL, and lost in the playoffs.

It's up to the Tigers now...
Leading the league, and going all the way!

Ciao!

Joe

http://www.swissarmyfork.com
 
Film will never be extinct; indtead it will merely fade into the darkness like prints that didn't stay in the fix long enough...

That being said however, I still shoot chrome when it's something really important.
--
-Tom
 
This is tourist season here in the Big Apple. Gotta' tell you.Was up at Times Square recently. Tons of people.
Most people I see are carrying p/s digital cameras. Occasionaly you will see
someone with a $3.99 Fuji or Kodak one time use camera. That's basically it.
 
Bob,

It's a simple matter of economics. Most of South America is economically deprived sans a wealthy few. Amazing just how poor most of the populace really is. Sad but a truism!
--

' You don't have to have the best of everything to get the best out of what you do have'.
 
I used film a lot in the 80s then switched to all digital. I am back using film again (still use digital for web pics). Age 34. Profession: software engineer. Film rocks!
 
Camera manufactures, need to address there is a market for people who just wants simple point and shoot camera. like the once use, and send it back to get developed, but in (digital form). They don't need a monitor, just something quick and simple. Yes I do know people who wont go to digital because they find it too complex, and they wont spend there good money in digital, so the environment losses again in return.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top