Post your best Airplane pix

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ubilam
  • Start date Start date
When I first looked at them I thought to myself -- so sharp -- this must be the 400mm f/5.6L -- it has it's own crisp look -- and sure enough...

What I found interesting is your description of shutter speeds -- right or wrong -- I have figured that with my 70-200 f/4L I have to keep the shutter speed up to at least 1/1000 to get a decent image -- your shots with 2x the reach are much slower than what I figured I'd need -- when I get this lens -- here is one w/ the zoom telephoto....

EF 70-200 f/4L -- 1/2500, f/6.3, ISO 400

 
Here are two pics of an SH-60B, I took these a few hours ago during a VERTREP (Vertical Replenishment). Sorry if they're not the greatest, had to use auto mode on the cam, the ship was rocking side to side and it was extremely windy. Enjoy!





--
-Hector
 
Lart thank you very much for your offer.

Before quitting I was chasing the 1000 km flight and there are two dream places for that: Australia and Patagonia !!!

I am afraid it will remain a dream but still I appreciate your support.
--
Bob
If two people agree on everything one of them is redundant.
 
I am stunned by the perfect exposures of most shots many of you posted (and the great colours).

What type of AE mode do you use for these shots ?

Also, which mode of AF ?

Thank you
--
Bob
If two people agree on everything one of them is redundant.
 
When I first looked at them I thought to myself -- so sharp -- this
must be the 400mm f/5.6L -- it has it's own crisp look -- and sure
enough...

What I found interesting is your description of shutter speeds --
right or wrong -- I have figured that with my 70-200 f/4L I have to
keep the shutter speed up to at least 1/1000 to get a decent image
-- your shots with 2x the reach are much slower than what I figured
I'd need -- when I get this lens -- here is one w/ the zoom
telephoto....
Thanks - I really appreciate the comments.

The 70-200/4L is an outstanding lens - I use mine a lot - it’s the lens I use most often when shooting motorsports. For airshows I generally only use that lens for formation shots like the one of the Thunderbirds I took last month below:



1/1000s f/6.3 at 189.0mm iso200

I like to keep shutter speeds for props 1/250 or slower to capture the prop blur. For me the key to lower shutter speeds isn't so much the lens - with aircraft is the same as for motorsports: panning and stabilization. I don’t have IS lens (although I’ve borrowed some from a friend before) so for stabilization I use a monopod, and I’ve found the monopod gives me as good results or better than IS. This is more of a personal preference than anything else - some swear by monopods (like me) others just swear at them.

I probably use the 400/5.6 80-90% of the time for flying aircraft. A lot of people like the 100-400 better because of versatility of the zoom. I’m biased toward primes so I like the 400/5.6 better - again it’s a matter of personal preference/style.

Brit
-----------
http://www.pbase.com/brit_ve/lafb_apr06
 


I went to an RC fun fly with one of my buddies and one of the club members brought his Yak-52 over for a couple of low passes.

Camera make: Canon
Camera model: Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL
Date/Time: 2005:11:05 14:10:22
Focal length: 70.0mm
Exposure time: 0.0016 s (1/640)
Aperture: f/5.6
ISO equiv.: 100
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: matrix
 
...I should also get a monopod -- I have a tripod and really don't use it as much as I should -- but I think I would use a monopod most of the time -- as it's much more flexible -- ops, I mean, it has more utility for the type of photography which interests me -- and I guess you have used yours for these aircraft shots as well. Any recommendations?

And by the way, I wasn't implying that your shots were good [only] because you have the 400mm prime -- and I perfer primes as well -- but that images from this lens, when accomplished with skill, are so unique in quality that I can almost recognized them -- I'm glad to see some shots of aircraft vs. birds -- but, I also recognize how difficult it is to get bird shots -- the likes of some of the photogs here have constantly shown us outstanding images.

Here is an other one of my aircraft shots...

 
Some great pix being posted here! Thanx for sharing them all!

Ubi.
=============
I'd like to see some old Harvards and Spitfires, or a couple of
Pitts Specials and Jennies. Gliders or jets. In the air or not. Your
model plane masterpieces.
 
Is that enough, or do you mant more?

Martin
Those are great, Martin! Beautiful and well photo'd.
Being a Canuck, I always remembered the Harvard trainer
as all yellow here. Special unforgettable sound that motor makes
when going into a dive...

Ubi.
 
...I should also get a monopod -- I have a tripod and really don't
use it as much as I should -- but I think I would use a monopod
most of the time -- as it's much more flexible -- ops, I mean, it
has more utility for the type of photography which interests me --
and I guess you have used yours for these aircraft shots as well.
Any recommendations?
I used my monopod for all the aircraft shots - but I'm certainly far from a monopod expert - I use the Manfrotto 680B with a standard tilt head and I'm happy with it. Others may have better recommendations (esp. if you want a lighter monopod). One thing I like about the one I have is it is very comfortable resting on my shoulder. I don’t have it yet but I plan on getting a three-legged folding base for the monopod (to make kind of a small semi-stable tripod) – it’s something Daniella’s uses.
And by the way, I wasn't implying that your shots were good [only]
because you have the 400mm prime -- and I perfer primes as well --
but that images from this lens, when accomplished with skill, are
so unique in quality that I can almost recognized them -- I'm glad
to see some shots of aircraft vs. birds -- but, I also recognize
how difficult it is to get bird shots -- the likes of some of the
photogs here have constantly shown us outstanding images.
Absolutely NO offense taken, I consider myself more of a rank amateur, learning every day. I recognize that there are many on this forum that are far better than I am. I switched from film after almost 30-yrs (I started quite young…) to DSLR almost a year ago and, surprising to me, there has been more of a learning curve than I’d expect.
This forum and its members have been a great source of information for me.
Here is an other one of my aircraft shots...

Looks like a shot of either Air Force One or Two – they do touch-and-go practice regularly at a nearby airport. I haven’t managed my timing to get a picture of one yet, they don’t broadcast their schedule well. You were in a good position....
 
(snipped)
Beautiful hand launch of an R C Glider

~~~~~~~~
Your pic shows how to do it properly with a hand-launch electric
glider... use two people that know what they're doing!

Heres my result of not taking any "pilot's" lessons after building
a model plane. It's a 6' balsa wing and 'grabbed' the air nice.



The rest of this electric plane was a gnarled unfortunate mess after
the first 5.2 second flight. Big downer after so much work (2 weeks
model building) but was eye-opener. Always use a pro model flyer for
first launches.
The wing is about 15 years old and I couldn't thro it out.

Ubi.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top