Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks. a good review - must have been the same group that David was part of (same scenery).
They used Minolta lenses in the tests.The village shot on page 10 was supposedly taken with a 100-400mm
telephoto zoom, but I don't see that lens listed. Is it one Sony
intends to come out with later in the year? Also, would that be
the actual mm or eqivalent mm?
I agree with you. In fact I think you were "charitable".
I would describe them as "lousy" pictures.
I hope these are due to photographer error and poor web posting.
Not a good show. Just awfull display.
I wasn't there, but I know who "was there" and I trust his opinions completely. When he says the lighting conditions were brutal I would have to assume he is absolutely correct. I've been to Morocco during the same time of year many times and it would be difficult "not" to have brutal lighting conditions.The problem is you do not know the lighting conditions. You were
not there!
There doesn't need to be. That wasn't the purpose. Photo Journalists were given production Alpha 100's to test under the conditions they normally shoot and their opinions were that the cameras performed very, very well. That's good enough for me.The camera may have operated properly, but the pictures are LOUSY.
There is nothing in this review to show how the camera can take
GREAT pictures.
Well, there are many more images from the cameras available and more coming every day. Reviewers at very trusted review sites are all singing the praises of the image quality, especially at lower ISO.If a reviewer wants to show how a camera can overcome particularly
difficult lighting conditions, I certainly would appreciate this.
But this was not done here, except for flipping comments.
Show me some GREAT pictures first, then show me how a camera can
overcome difficult lighting conditions.
This review is not doing Sony any favor. I don't expect any
reviewer to do any favor to any camera manufacturer, but there is
absolutely nothing wrong with a reviewer showing GREAT pictures
taken under good light conditions. Then, if you want to show me
something else, fine. But show me some GREAT pictures first.
Sorry, but I don't buy anything you said.
The review was not written for "photo journalists".
This is a review of a camera.
And if it was written by a photo journalist for photo journalists
then you are the judge since you are a photo journalist and you can
decide.
I am not a photo journalist, but I have been in Morroco twice and
took pictures there.
This was an amateurish review with flip comments, I will not
comment on how the last image is "35 mm slide like" Wow!