SD700IS Impressions and Images, It's great!

Troyus

Well-known member
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Location
Toronto, CA
I bought the Canon SD700IS a week ago to take with me on my trip to the Mayan Riviera, Mexico, and I can now honestly say that it rocks! I did a lot of research (looking at early reviews, what users wrote in these forums...etc), and I'm very glad I went with the SD700.

In the week I was gone, I took 985 shots (the first few hundred were for test purposes), and so that you can check them out and see what you think for yourself, I've uploaded them to my gallery, here: http://marcustroiano.com/blog/v/mayan-riviera-mexico-spring-2006/

You'll find a variety of different images, taken in a variety of different conditions (sunny, cloudy, night time etc...), as well as some video clips.

The SD700IS is incredibly fast! Whether you're talking about flash recharge time, or shot-to-shot speads, I've never seen better. It turns on/off fast, switches modes fast, truly a pleasure to shoot with! 4X zoom is a really nice addition, as you have more to work with, it's not anything like a 10X, but 4X is definitely nicer than 3X.

The LCD is great, and easy to use even in direct sunlight! I do have one complaint though. I found the black anti-glare coating on the LCD to scratch, even though I was extremely careful with it. Has anyone else had this happen, and if so any solutions? It's still completely usable, and you can't see it much when its on (but you can if its sunny, when looked at on a certain angle). It's not a huge deal, it just irks me though.

The images and movies this camera takes are excellent! Even in hard to shoot environments it excels. I would avoid ISO 800, although if you use something like NeatImage, you can remedy the noise. I never had a real problem with noise at any other ISO's, and found the camera to take great shots even with no flash! I also found red-eye not to be a problem. The video's it takes are equally good too.

The scene modes can be really helpful, and I used them quite a lot (Night Mode and Beach Mode). I did's use the My Colors modes too much yet, but from what I can tell they work well and are pretty cool.

Physically, the camera is quite tiny, but manages to fit in your hands really well! It's build quality is also exceptional.

I was really surprised by this camera's battery life. I was looking forward (well, not really) to having 240 shots/charge, but I was very pleasently surprised when I got nearly 400 shots/charge!!! And, I was using it normally, with all the settings on default. So I'm definietly impressed! IS is a great feature as well, and it really saved a lot of my flash-free shots in the evenings. I use the shoot-only IS setting.

So I must say, I'm very impressed with this ultra-compact, and would definietly recommend it to anyone looking for a new camera. At first I was seriously considering the Sony DSC-T30, but boy am I happy I got this instead! If you have any questions, please feel free to ask! I'd love to help you all, like I was helped :).

The following image is one I especially liked. It's a simple sunset shot, but I thought it looked great. I didn't do any post processing (besides removing one small speck in PS).



I have a ton more I'd like to show, but I don't want to lengthen this already long post. Just check out my gallery: http://marcustroiano.com/blog/v/mayan-riviera-mexico-spring-2006/

Also, one last thing. I noticed that at times when you use the flash in a dark area, you get circular, semi transparent artifacts added to the picture. I wasn't too happy with that, though it doesn't always happen.
--
My PhotoBlog: http://marcustroiano.com/pixelpost/
 
Nice shot! Hmmm... Might recommend my friends this P&S camera. :)
--
'There is more under the surface if you ever want to know...'
 
Sorry, these are relay nice motives - BUT:

Dont´t you see that a big area down to the left corner is totally unsharp and washed out in all pics!!

Its a full quarter with softness - too much for my taste to tolerate.

Sorry, but I would change the cam, may next one will be better...
 
The SD700IS is incredibly fast! Whether you're talking about flash
recharge time, or shot-to-shot speads, I've never seen better. It
turns on/off fast, switches modes fast, truly a pleasure to shoot
with! 4X zoom is a really nice addition, as you have more to work
with, it's not anything like a 10X, but 4X is definitely nicer than
3X.
I've been using an Ixus 400 a lot this week. It takes fantastically good pictures, but it's so much slower than my usual Ixus 50 ...
The LCD is great, and easy to use even in direct sunlight! I do
have one complaint though. I found the black anti-glare coating on
the LCD to scratch, even though I was extremely careful with it.
Has anyone else had this happen, and if so any solutions? It's
still completely usable, and you can't see it much when its on (but
you can if its sunny, when looked at on a certain angle). It's not
a huge deal, it just irks me though.
I think the anti-glare coating is completely not worth the effort. I strongly recommend you get a daProducts protector - 2mm of perspex. It won't be "anti-glare" any more, but considering what you paid for the camera it'll render the LCD nigh-invulnerable ;-) I have one on my Ixus 50 and fervently recommend them to anyone with a compact with large LCD. I'm surprised Canon don't put in a perspex shield themselves, since they did on my 2002 PowerShot A40 ...
The images and movies this camera takes are excellent! Even in hard
to shoot environments it excels. I would avoid ISO 800, although if
you use something like NeatImage, you can remedy the noise. I never
had a real problem with noise at any other ISO's, and found the
camera to take great shots even with no flash! I also found red-eye
not to be a problem. The video's it takes are equally good too.
Don't forget that "ISO ratings" on a digital camera are only vaguely related to what film does. Digital cameras just do it by amplifying the CCD output, so noise is inherent in the process. Digital users should IMO always leave the ISO on the minimum unless they actually need it.
Also, one last thing. I noticed that at times when you use the
flash in a dark area, you get circular, semi transparent artifacts
added to the picture. I wasn't too happy with that, though it
doesn't always happen.
That's inherent to compact cameras - like red-eye, it's an effect of having the flash so near the lens. It's actually the flash reflecting off dust in the air. There's probably a good page on it somewhere ...

--
http://reddragdiva.co.uk (current) http://reddragdiva.fotopic.net (old)
 
Could you point out a specific image that has this problem? One that is obvious to everyone? I've gone thru several on his very nice site, and don't notice it. But I don't have that "eye", which may be good or bad! Thanks.
 
Could you point out a specific image that has this problem? One
that is obvious to everyone? I've gone thru several on his very
nice site, and don't notice it. But I don't have that "eye", which
may be good or bad! Thanks.
I'm not the one who made the original comment, but I've noticed similar problems with other SD700 pictures. The corner blurriness is only really visible at full wide angle (5.8mm). Below are some obvious examples.

However, to be fair, I think this individual camera is an extreme example (or defective) as the fuzziness I've seen in other SD700 images is not as pronounced.

***

The grass in the lower left corner is completely out-of-focus/blurred when objects that are both closer to the camera (lower righthand yucca leaves and grass) and further from the camera ARE in focus:

http://marcustroiano.com/blog/v/mayan-riviera-mexico-spring-2006/tulum-mayan-ruins/IMG_0698.jpg.html?g2_imageViewsIndex=1

***

Here's a shot with the camera rotated 90 degress counterclockwise (you can tell it's CCW, not CW, because the blur has now moved to the lower right corner!):

http://marcustroiano.com/blog/v/mayan-riviera-mexico-spring-2006/tulum-mayan-ruins/IMG_0689.jpg.html?g2_imageViewsIndex=1

***

Camera rotated CCW again. Look at entire right side of frame. Blurry, when objects both nearer and farther are in focus on the other side of the frame.

http://marcustroiano.com/blog/v/mayan-riviera-mexico-spring-2006/tulum-mayan-ruins/IMG_0767.jpg.html?g2_imageViewsIndex=1
 
Thanks for pointing out those individual shots, I actually didn't notice those at first. I sure hope there's nothing wrong with the camera. Could this softness be caused by the use of Auto Focus? As, when in use it focuses on certain areas, maybe the corners weren't included? If so, can I turn it off while in auto mode? I seemed to be be able to turn it off only in manual...

Thanks for the comments.
--
My PhotoBlog: http://marcustroiano.com/pixelpost/
 
Some nice comments, thanks!

I checked out the screen protector you talked about, and there's a model 'da T1 Protector™ (Model 113), which claims to support the SD550, would it work for the SD700 as well? And, the scratches I have now....should be less visable with the protecor? Will the anti-glare coating interfere with the protector (make it too dark maybe?).

--
My PhotoBlog: http://marcustroiano.com/pixelpost/
 
I just wanted to add, that if this is an extreme case as you mentioned might be possible, what can I tell the people at the store? I didn't even notice until you pointed it out, and I'm not sure if they would...

And yeah, like I said before, I really hope that's just caused by AutoFocus...and I hope the camera is alright...Then again, I don't think it's too bad on most shots, you really need to analyze it...
--
My PhotoBlog: http://marcustroiano.com/pixelpost/
 
--Why did you have to use flash on a scene which was dark. I thought the whole purpose of the IS was NOT to use flash and I think everyone would like to know if the IS is a worthy upgrade as I have the Ixus700 without IS
Nice holiday by the way. Thanks for sharing
fredyr
 
The point in IS is not just to enable you to take photos without flash - that's more to do with high ISO.

In actual fact IS essentially allows you to take photos at slower shutter speeds with less camera shake - or simply reduce camera shake in general in any scene.

IS does nothing to help with subject blur and can make it worse due to the longer shutter speed. So depending on your subject you may actually feel you need flash more in dark situations with IS.

Since the IS is supposed to give you perhaps a 3 stop advantage and the high ISO setting in the SD700 gives a further advantage it's a pretty good anti-shake/low-light combination and definitely worth it. I've had some great results from mine!
 
Be happy if you do not see it - I can´t name one single pic because it is obvious in every pic of this mexico serie ;-).

More than usual, see testpics here or at dresource.com which are less fuzzy but still a little unsparp in the edges. Seems to be a generell Ixus Problem of the SD Serie.

38mm starting Cams like the W100 or W50 or Z850 will do a much better job here with great sharpness over the whole pic.
 
Although your photos are good... I was very disappointed when I went through them because of the out of focus problems at the left edge of every shot. Colors seem to be ok but very soft and kinda dull.

This was on my short list of cameras to compliment my D70S but your photos helped remove it from the list.

Thanks for posting. Looks like a great vacation!
 
Out of focus? with 35mm?

Hey, looking all pics its equal if is a cloth to the cam or not , certain areas of these pics are always fuzzy!!!

Its a fault of this specific cam, a lense fault!

I am a little bit confused that no one gets this point here. All beginners?
Sorry...
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top