FZ30 ebay batteries

hehe, complete with MADE IN JAPAN label. It sure is 'original' counterfeit ;-)
 
that battery IS a fake.

first, pany doesn't abbreviate "don't". on their true OEM battery, they don't use that word ;)

and if they did, they'd have english speaking editors correct the "DO N'T" and remove that embedded space.

sigh. clear clues that this is a fake.

(also, no french printing. pany prints in english and french. at least on their batts)

--
bryan (pics @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/linux-works )
(pics and more @ http://www.netstuff.org ) ~
 
You're probably right, but for $21 shipped, its probably as good as the other after market batteries out there. I charged it and its in the camera now, I'll see once I start taking pictures how well it will last compared to the original.
 
I'm in australia and that packaging is identical to Panasonic's original packing. I have one here with me. Also on both my batteries the "Don't" appears with the apostrophe. So the photo, at least, is genuine Panasonic.

PP

--
Camedia C750
Lumix FZ30 + Olympus WCON-07
Pentax ist D + Sigma 18-125
Hoya +10 Macro
 
I'm in australia and that packaging is identical to Panasonic's
original packing. I have one here with me. Also on both my
batteries the "Don't" appears with the apostrophe. So the photo, at
least, is genuine Panasonic.
here is what I got, in my actual pany camera (shown with other knock-offs, but the panys are the 2 on the right.)



both panys have that recycle logo on them, but that also has an 800 phone # which is probably US only. and my cams came as US warranteed.

but the panys also have a 'look' to them that the one in question, does not. it just looks kind of wrong to me.

btw, I have some computer results, from a test I did a while ago:

http://www.netstuff.org/battery/graphs/

--
bryan (pics @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/linux-works )
(pics and more @ http://www.netstuff.org ) ~
 
I've just taken a pic of mine, this is the original supplied with the FZ30 in Feb '06, looks pretty much the same to me.

PP



--
Camedia C750
Lumix FZ30 + Olympus WCON-07
Pentax ist D + Sigma 18-125
Hoya +10 Macro
 
....shame I didn't use the FZ30 to take the photo, sorry about the iffy quality. :))

PP
--
Camedia C750
Lumix FZ30 + Olympus WCON-07
Pentax ist D + Sigma 18-125
Hoya +10 Macro
 
Apart from little mistakes in their english, maybe a slightly different appearance, surely the most important part of this discussion is how long the dam things last.

I went your route for a spare with my FZ10. Within months the knock-off was discharging too quickly. Llets imagine you're out for the day, have exhausted your prime (Panny) battery and are now relying on another un proven battery.
I personally do not care to take this risk
--
Ask anyone over 60 how's it going and they'll tell you 'so far, so good!'
 
Judging from the first charge cycle, when it stated to show less than 3 bars, it discharged very quicly. I just charged it again and I took 113 pictures within 15 minutes mostly with the flash and it still shows 3 bars, So I dunno I did not make the same test with the original.
 
I agree with you. I personally will not purchase an aftermarket battery for my FZ30 after my initial experience with them. After getting an FZ20 for work, instead of getting OEM batteriest, our purchasing department got us some Power2000 batteries. First of all, the Power2000s felt different inserting them into the camera. When I tried to remove them, the spring in the camera was not strong enough to pop the battery out. I had to use something to pry it out. I tried another one and it was the same story except it was even harder to take out. I guess you could call it poor quality control. After that, I said forget about the aftermarket batteries. I convinced our purchasing dept to get some OEM batteries and have never had a problem with them. When the company decided to also purchase two FZ30s, the decision was a no-brainer - OEM all the way.

To understand what the problem was, I carefully examined the batteries and found a couple of differences. The metal contacts in the OEM batteries look slightly different from the aftermarket ones which explain the difference in friction qualities between the two. The electrical contact area on the Power2000s also seem to be on some kind of sub-assembly. There was an obvious gap between the contact sub-assembly and the rest of the battery body. On the Panasonic OEM, it looks like this part is either part of the same mold or ultrasonically welded together for a more consistent fit. In addition, the slots where the contacts reside, are ever so slightly wider on the aftermarket part. This to me is another indication of poor tolerance control in manufacturing, necessitating the bigger space. You can see this in one of the photos posted in the first thread here so it does appear that it is a knockoff.

This is by no means an attempt to convince those of you who have purchased and saved money on aftermarket batteries. To each his or her own. It's just not for me.
 
I bought Power2000 batteries for my FZ20 when I had it. Yes they worked but only lasted 1/2 to 2/3 as long as the Pana OEM. As they were considerably cheaper I don't feel too bad about it.

But I would never buy again because IMO they clearly misrepresented their specs indicating it was a better batter than the Pana OEM when it is not.

Sirandar
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top