Yeah. I ordered one due to the huge pro recommendations I see. It
was a piece of %$#@ if you ask me. I ordered a F1X (their largest)
ballistic nylon. It offers like NO protection and virtually NO real
padding on the bags perimeter at all. Just in the center, and that
was weak to start with. The overall construction was CHEAP and
lightweight. I would NEVER even consider one again. I paid $105 or
that. Returned it and got a Canon Pro 1E bag. Larger, WAY better
built, Tons of adjustable padded dividers, water proof and just a
Mercedes compared to that what ever you would call it.
Lee
You are confusing camera bags for carrying kit and camera bags,
like the Domke range, that are designed to work out of. It is not a
coincidence that the vast majority of PJs use Domke, we are not
sheep that just get what the next guy has. The padding is less
because "over padded" bags don't sit on your shoulder properly, the
Domke bags almost mould themselves to your hip. The insides are
made to be extremely configurable and easily replaced. This all
adds up to a bag that offers protection without bulk.
I am not trying to convert you to using a Domke, every person who
carries a camera has a different need for a bag. Jim Domke called
his original model the "shooter's bag" and he was right. He
realised that there was a trade off between protection and every
day usability and he never claimed that his bags were suitable for
airport baggage handlers or stopping bullets! A bag to carry
cameras, computers, clothes et al has to be a compromise of a
different sort - one I would never be prepared to make.
I love Domke bags, you don't. I hate Tamrac, you love them - it's
no big deal, but please bear in mind that bags to transport
equipment (and clothes?) are just about the most personal item a
photographer owns.
Neil.
http://www.dg28.com