Thanks and sorry for hijacking the thread Kiwi Man.
As to the EQ5 on a photo tripod... well, that's pretty much my setup at home. I've owned fairly big scopes in the past and have noticed that the tripod legs are definitely the weakest link in a scope setup, especially the factory supplied ones.
However... I had bought a chinese made carbon fiber tripod to carry around when hiking. For the telescope part, I use the head (the part without the tripod, for non astr folks) from a nexstar80gt, which is very small and lightweight, and has got (computer controlled to automatically find and track celestial objects). All together the setup weighs about 8lbs, not too bad for hiking.
I also own an lxd55 mount, which is the Meade version of the EQ5, and pretty much the same size and weight. As a lark, I took the head off the tripod and mounted it to the tripod in place of the center column, just to test how stable the tripod is with a heavy load. To my amazement, that setup was much more stable than the tripod I was using with the mount! That was a shock to me, but convinced me that a decent photo tripod is a pretty stable beast. So now, I use the lxd55/photo tripod setup at home with great results not only for deep sky shots, but for planetary work as well. The latest shots in my astro gallery (from the past couple of months or so) were done with that setup.
Ok, nuff blabber and again sorry for hijacking the thread. If there is interest, I can post some pics of my setup using the photo tripod and my scope. That is, if it's ok with you to post them in your thread.
Thanks again for the beautiful pic.
Daniel
--
----------------------------------------------
http://www.pbase.com/dciobota