Affordable color profiling software?

garrettb

Member
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Location
Boston, US
Ok, I'm beginning to realize that the only way I'l ever make peace with the 1280 is to buy a color profile/management sytem. I dread asking this, but can anyone recommend a windows color profile system for under $100? Obviously, I'm not looking for perfection here, just something that will help me adjust to Epson's constant change of paper and ink formulations.

Thanks,
Garrett
 
Profile Prism from the makers of QImage Pro

http://www.ddisoftware.com/prism/

currently for cameras and scanners but soon for printers too.

John
Ok, I'm beginning to realize that the only way I'l ever make peace
with the 1280 is to buy a color profile/management sytem. I dread
asking this, but can anyone recommend a windows color profile
system for under $100? Obviously, I'm not looking for perfection
here, just something that will help me adjust to Epson's constant
change of paper and ink formulations.

Thanks,
Garrett
 
I have had very good luck with Wiziwig from PraxiSoft. The software is free, but the necessary reflective target is $79.00. I used it to profile different papers on an S800 and it did a great job. One thing, though: its performance seems greatly tied to the quality of the scanner used to scan the target.
Ok, I'm beginning to realize that the only way I'l ever make peace
with the 1280 is to buy a color profile/management sytem. I dread
asking this, but can anyone recommend a windows color profile
system for under $100? Obviously, I'm not looking for perfection
here, just something that will help me adjust to Epson's constant
change of paper and ink formulations.

Thanks,
Garrett
 
Although I don't own that colour management software I would agree that Wiziwig is a good start for the money. Like most things if you find you want even better results than are offered by this you will need to spend more money.

One thing you should be aware of is that these types of packages will provide you with decent and consistent printer output across various media. It doesn't guarantee that what you see on your monitor approaches what you get on the print. For that you really need a monitor calibration hardware device & software that is capable of generating a decent ICC monitor profile.

Tony
Ok, I'm beginning to realize that the only way I'l ever make peace
with the 1280 is to buy a color profile/management sytem. I dread
asking this, but can anyone recommend a windows color profile
system for under $100? Obviously, I'm not looking for perfection
here, just something that will help me adjust to Epson's constant
change of paper and ink formulations.

Thanks,
Garrett
 
I have had very good luck with Wiziwig from PraxiSoft. The
software is free, but the necessary reflective target is $79.00.
Thanks, Bruce. I was looking at Wiziwig last night, but the order form was so confusing -- I couldn't figure out what I actually needed to buy. Now I get it, all those choices were additions to the base software. So I can just order the target and use the software I downloaded from their site.

Tony, you just updated the thread as I was typing. I'm going to try to find a place that rents out monitor calibration units. (I can't even pretend to justify the cost for a 1 time use!) There must be a market for these units in the Boston area. I'm used to altering an online image for optimization to the printer, but the result on the screen is always unsatisfactory, so I have to save an image for online viewing, and an image for printing - ugh, a file management nightmare.

John, I really really like QImagePro, so if they had it out now, that would be my first choice!
Thanks so much...
 
Tony,

I think what you mentioned below is the trouble I am having using WiziWYG. I create a profile for my epson, print, and the results don't match my monitor, but If I do a proof in PS6 using the created profile, the display does show what my print will look like. How can I get my monitor to always show me what my epson will print. When I open the pictures they look great, but when I print them they look off. I think my monitor is displaying them correctly, but the printer is not printing them accurately...Sorry if I confused everyone, but that is how I feel... VERY CONFUSED!

...Jimmy
One thing you should be aware of is that these types of packages
will provide you with decent and consistent printer output across
various media. It doesn't guarantee that what you see on your
monitor approaches what you get on the print. For that you really
need a monitor calibration hardware device & software that is
capable of generating a decent ICC monitor profile.

Tony
Ok, I'm beginning to realize that the only way I'l ever make peace
with the 1280 is to buy a color profile/management sytem. I dread
asking this, but can anyone recommend a windows color profile
system for under $100? Obviously, I'm not looking for perfection
here, just something that will help me adjust to Epson's constant
change of paper and ink formulations.

Thanks,
Garrett
 
That's right. What you need to do is download the software from their site. The software alone will allow you to calibrate your monitor visually. This didn't work too well for me. Then you go to the order page and order the Wiziwyg IT8 target for $79, which they mail to you quickly. This will allow the software to also be used to do printer profiles. For me, the printer profiles have been great. They really make the color look perfect.

As for getting your monitor profiled correctly, I sort of gave up on that, since I couldn't do a good job visually and can't conceive of spending $300 for a spyder calibrator. what I did was use the selection feature on the monitor (HP) and choose the setting for graphics and images. This, together with the generic HP profile provided with the monitor, setting brightness at 100 and contrast at about 72, get me pretty clase to what I see printed out. Good luck.
Thanks, Bruce. I was looking at Wiziwig last night, but the order
form was so confusing -- I couldn't figure out what I actually
needed to buy.
 
Jimmy,

Reading this and your comments on the other thread I'm not sure what you have and what you don't have. Let me try and briefly explain...

To get a good match between screen and print you need two things, a good Monitor ICC profile and a good printer ICC profile for the ink/paper combination you use.

When you load your image into PS you say it is untagged. This is bad news since Photoshop likes to know what colourspace it is working in. Assign a colourspace to the image data using Image-> Mode-> Asisgn profile. Let's say you assign it the Adobe RGB profile as a working space. This now gets the image into a now state for colour management.

Now what do see on the monitor? Are the colours reasonable? If yes then great. They won't actually print as well because the colour gamut of your printer cannot match that of the monitor. When the data is sent to the printer the colours will be slightly compressed into the smaller printer gamut. Want to see what it will look like on screen? That's where the soft proofing of PS6 comes in. Go to View-> Proof Seup-> Custom, and for the profile choose your printer ICC profile. Once you've done that you can toggle between the image as shown in the native Adobe RGB colourspace and the printer soft proof by toggling the view using CTRL-Y.

You really only want to preview your image using the printer colorspace and not actually edit in that colourspace since you would otherwise be working in a colourspace that has rather a small gamut. This is the beauty of Photoshop's soft-proofing features; if you switch to another paper or output device you simply load up the soft proof profile for that output device to see how it would look there.

Now to the actual printing...

When you print you need to first set up the output colour management in PS using Print-> Options. Make sure the Show More Options checkbox is selected and that the Colour management dropdown box is selected.

The document source space is the one you assigned above, in this case Adobe RGB. The Print Space profile is the Printer profile you chose earlier for your soft proofing options.

Go ahead and make a print. It should reasonably match the soft proof you saw on screen. If it didn't then there is more than likely something wrong either with the actual output printer profile or the soft-proofing part of the printer profile (there are two lookup tables which are different - one for each - I'm not sure if wiziwig creates both properly or even differentiates between the two).

Ideally you want your digital camera to assign a profile to the image data for PS so it has a known starting point - that is quite important in a good colour management workflow. If it can't do that and you only get untagged files, your first action when loading them into PS should be to assign a profile to them (if PS doesn't do that automatically).

Hope this helps,
Tony
...Jimmy
One thing you should be aware of is that these types of packages
will provide you with decent and consistent printer output across
various media. It doesn't guarantee that what you see on your
monitor approaches what you get on the print. For that you really
need a monitor calibration hardware device & software that is
capable of generating a decent ICC monitor profile.

Tony
Ok, I'm beginning to realize that the only way I'l ever make peace
with the 1280 is to buy a color profile/management sytem. I dread
asking this, but can anyone recommend a windows color profile
system for under $100? Obviously, I'm not looking for perfection
here, just something that will help me adjust to Epson's constant
change of paper and ink formulations.

Thanks,
Garrett
 
Thanks for all the info Tony... I guess where I am messing up is that I'm not loading a profile for my Untagged Nikon 995 Images. I will try this and see what my results are. When I soft proof the photos using my created profile, the soft proof does match what the printer is printing, but the soft proof shifts all of my blues to a purplish color. Thanks again, and I will let you know what my results are.

...Jimmy
Reading this and your comments on the other thread I'm not sure
what you have and what you don't have. Let me try and briefly
explain...

To get a good match between screen and print you need two things, a
good Monitor ICC profile and a good printer ICC profile for the
ink/paper combination you use.

When you load your image into PS you say it is untagged. This is
bad news since Photoshop likes to know what colourspace it is
working in. Assign a colourspace to the image data using
Image-> Mode-> Asisgn profile. Let's say you assign it the Adobe RGB
profile as a working space. This now gets the image into a now
state for colour management.

Now what do see on the monitor? Are the colours reasonable? If yes
then great. They won't actually print as well because the colour
gamut of your printer cannot match that of the monitor. When the
data is sent to the printer the colours will be slightly compressed
into the smaller printer gamut. Want to see what it will look like
on screen? That's where the soft proofing of PS6 comes in. Go to
View-> Proof Seup-> Custom, and for the profile choose your printer
ICC profile. Once you've done that you can toggle between the image
as shown in the native Adobe RGB colourspace and the printer soft
proof by toggling the view using CTRL-Y.

You really only want to preview your image using the printer
colorspace and not actually edit in that colourspace since you
would otherwise be working in a colourspace that has rather a small
gamut. This is the beauty of Photoshop's soft-proofing features; if
you switch to another paper or output device you simply load up the
soft proof profile for that output device to see how it would look
there.

Now to the actual printing...

When you print you need to first set up the output colour
management in PS using Print-> Options. Make sure the Show More
Options checkbox is selected and that the Colour management
dropdown box is selected.

The document source space is the one you assigned above, in this
case Adobe RGB. The Print Space profile is the Printer profile you
chose earlier for your soft proofing options.

Go ahead and make a print. It should reasonably match the soft
proof you saw on screen. If it didn't then there is more than
likely something wrong either with the actual output printer
profile or the soft-proofing part of the printer profile (there are
two lookup tables which are different - one for each - I'm not sure
if wiziwig creates both properly or even differentiates between the
two).

Ideally you want your digital camera to assign a profile to the
image data for PS so it has a known starting point - that is quite
important in a good colour management workflow. If it can't do that
and you only get untagged files, your first action when loading
them into PS should be to assign a profile to them (if PS doesn't
do that automatically).

Hope this helps,
Tony
...Jimmy
One thing you should be aware of is that these types of packages
will provide you with decent and consistent printer output across
various media. It doesn't guarantee that what you see on your
monitor approaches what you get on the print. For that you really
need a monitor calibration hardware device & software that is
capable of generating a decent ICC monitor profile.

Tony
Ok, I'm beginning to realize that the only way I'l ever make peace
with the 1280 is to buy a color profile/management sytem. I dread
asking this, but can anyone recommend a windows color profile
system for under $100? Obviously, I'm not looking for perfection
here, just something that will help me adjust to Epson's constant
change of paper and ink formulations.

Thanks,
Garrett
 
Thanks for all the info Tony... I guess where I am messing up is
that I'm not loading a profile for my Untagged Nikon 995 Images. I
will try this and see what my results are. When I soft proof the
photos using my created profile, the soft proof does match what the
printer is printing, but the soft proof shifts all of my blues to a
purplish color. Thanks again, and I will let you know what my
results are.

...Jimmy
I have the same problem Jimmy has. Although I followed Ian Lyons' instructions to a "t" on setting up monitor and printer profiles, the image colors on my monitor are quite different from the PS6 soft proof or the Epson printer hard proof. How do I get the printer to print what I see on my monitor? BTW, thanks Tony for all the information you've posted. It's sure helped me a lot.

gt
 
Have you tried profiling your monitor using Adobe Gamma (the control panel)? If you're printer is profiled, and you're working with images in a colorspace like Adobe RGB, you should be able to match your print to your monitor (assuming you're viewing your print in the same color temperature of light).

Paul
 
Hi, Garret !

What's the with your 1280 ?
Ok, I'm beginning to realize that the only way I'l ever make peace
with the 1280 is to buy a color profile/management sytem. I dread
asking this, but can anyone recommend a windows color profile
system for under $100? Obviously, I'm not looking for perfection
here, just something that will help me adjust to Epson's constant
change of paper and ink formulations.

Thanks,
Garrett
 
What's the problem with your 1280 ?
What's the with your 1280 ?
Ok, I'm beginning to realize that the only way I'l ever make peace
with the 1280 is to buy a color profile/management sytem. I dread
asking this, but can anyone recommend a windows color profile
system for under $100? Obviously, I'm not looking for perfection
here, just something that will help me adjust to Epson's constant
change of paper and ink formulations.

Thanks,
Garrett
 
Have you tried profiling your monitor using Adobe Gamma (the
control panel)? If you're printer is profiled, and you're working
with images in a colorspace like Adobe RGB, you should be able to
match your print to your monitor (assuming you're viewing your
print in the same color temperature of light).

Paul
After spending the entire morning playing with color management options , printing out test prints, and using up a lot of ink, I've reached the point where I'm satisfied that the prints I'm getting are close to what I'm seeing on the monitor! My setup is that my monitor is profiled using Adobe Gamma, I'm using Adobe RGB colorspace for my images, and - here's the difference - I reset my printer device settings to "no color adjustment"! However, the soft proofs are still way off even though I'm using the correct printer/paper profile. But, since my prints are fine, I'm going to ignore the soft proofs.

I now know a lot more about color management than I ever wanted. There's got to be an easier way!

BTW, Paul, you're right. It's crucial to view prints in the same color light. By looking at my prints under different lights I realized what a difference the lighting makes.

gt
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top