OK, I'm done... F707 goes back

BryanS

Senior Member
Messages
4,104
Reaction score
0
Location
Midwest, US
I've probably stirred up enough trouble in the Sony forum, don't you think? :)

Anyway, it's time for me to come back fully to the Canon camp. The following is a message I just posted in the Sony Talk Forum concerning my decision to stay with the G2 and to return the F707 to Sears:

----

I've been pretty quiet for the last week, because I've been trying to get consistent results from the F707 I bought at Sears and have been comparing my results with other galleries on this forum. I'm just not liking what I'm seeing. It's been frustrating, and the few posts I've made in the last week have probably shown that frustration.

Not only that, but in head-to-head comparisons with the G2, I may not get the same level of detail in portraits with the Canon, I've found the G2 to be fairly effortless in getting quality shots. That's important to me with active children that I'm trying to take photos of and enjoy their company at the same time.

It's hard to tell how this story would have ended if the random blue syndrome hadn't appeared... RBS, that's my acronym (with apologies to Ulysses), as I still say it isn't a flaw just confined to the flash. Maybe I would have kept it, maybe not. The F707 had some things I liked, but there was still plenty that I did not... especially when compared to the G2 that I also owned.

I'll miss the following:

1. I warmed to the EVF, though I still think it looks like a VCR viewfinder
2. Loved the fast startup time
3. Enjoyed the nightframing (though somewhat gimmicky, IMO)
4. Has a better "shutter click" sound
5. Location of the tripod mount
6. Long battery life
7. Loved the longer zoom, and will miss that the most!
8. Last shot preview with the left arrow button
9. Longer movies
10. The laser focus... my kids really love that
11. Quick one-button manual white balance
12. 5MP instead of 4
13. A usable ISO 400 (if it's really ISO 400)

But there are still some things I don't like:

1. Memory sticks... too small and expensive

2. The "green auto mode" seems to only choose shutter speeds of 1/30 and above, and you have to set SCN mode for longer exposures (will newbies figure this out?)

3. Way too many keystrokes to delete an image... given the smaller size of the memory sticks, this is essential.

4. Preview of images take too long to load (and holding shutter button gives a low-quality preview)

5. Zoom button is upside down and inconvenient... no chance of one-handed operation like the G2.
6. The goofy Sony colors (mostly green and red)... IMO, no excuse for that.
7. The flash... there's NOTHING to love about the F707 flash (more below)

8. The camera strap keeps getting twisted because the connectors swivel 180 degrees (OK, so I'm picky, but that bugs me)
9. My wife thinks it's ugly
10. The CA is still more pronounced

11. The worst implementation of Auto White Balance that I've experienced on a digicam... and not enough white balance presets
12. No saturation control (in-camera)
13. A constantly smudged LCD.
14. Noisy shadows
15. Blue everywhere

Then there were the G2 features that I didn't think I could live without:

1. RAW format
2. Chris Breeze's Downloader Program
3. The microdrive (can you say "sweet"?)
4. The tilt-swivel LCD
5. The IR remote
6. The 420EX flash and the hotshoe
7. Multiple focus zones
8. Colors that are correct and white balance that works (for the most part)
9. Almost no noise

About that flash situation... the blue-shift isn't near as bad as the fact that all photos must be done at full aperture with the flash. For me, that's deadly. The HVL-F1000 flash makes the Vivitar 283 look like a BMW. The cold shoe left me... well, cold. And then there's the blue shift that appears mostly with the flash, but in daylight, too.

The kicker for me was when I took both cameras to a "Team Building" event at work for my employees. With the G2, I just kept happily snapping away, and managed to fire off over 200 pictures with the internal flash without thinking of running out of space. With the F707, I had two 128 meg sticks and constantly worried of running out of memory. In fact, I did run out before the day was done, and that was bad.

Then looking at the pictures revealed more... the G2 shots were nearly all perfectly exposed. The F707 shots were not nearly as good... over 3/4 had some sort of blue-shift, and the detail difference wasn't as noticable as when I had lots of time. In fact, I got more out of focus shots with the F707, and the colors really bothered me more than I thought they would.

The G2 shots I uploaded to the Internet with no editing, and the F707 shots required me to edit nearly every one... which took me over two hours.

Then there was my overall feeling that I developed about the two cameras. The G2 makes me feel confident that I'll get an acceptable shot or maybe even an exceptional one, from time-to-time. There's nothing that really irks me about the camera.

The F707 I knew had more of a chance of an exceptional shot, but produced a greater number of unacceptable ones. Not only that, but the obvious flaws in the camera ended up making it a love-hate relationship for me. It's kinda like that first dent in your new car... you get a sick feeling, and no matter how hard you try, your eye keeps going to the flaw.

Finally, I don't think I could bring myself to rewarding Sony with my dollars, my confidence they'd address the problem, or my patience. As I've said before, this camera may be ahead of its time, but that shows in many ways that aren't very appealing. I'll give a look at the next model, but by then, I expect other manufacturers to have surpassed the bar that Sony raised and then dropped.

Most here won't be surprised with my choice, and some will say I made my decision before I started. I know I can't convince them, but I really wanted to like this camera. I really feel like I gave it an open-minded shot, though some will disagree... but it IS my choice in the end.

I do want to hang around after this goes back. I've developed an affection for many of you, and I'm wanting to see if Sony addresses your concerns with this camera. And I'll always be looking at your photos while thinking what might have been. ;)

Thanks, everyone!

Bryan
 
Bryan I think you showed amazing virtue and patience to last as long as you did. The problem with your post to the sony forum is that what is even more irking then an opinionated devils advocate that gets all their facts wrong is an opinionated devils advocate that is spot on :) I hope you have thick skin.

Shame that the 707 is so flaky. I hope that Sony sorts it out for all those guys.

Happy shooting

Al
I've probably stirred up enough trouble in the Sony forum, don't
you think? :)

Anyway, it's time for me to come back fully to the Canon camp. The
following is a message I just posted in the Sony Talk Forum
concerning my decision to stay with the G2 and to return the F707
to Sears:

----

I've been pretty quiet for the last week, because I've been trying
to get consistent results from the F707 I bought at Sears and have
been comparing my results with other galleries on this forum. I'm
just not liking what I'm seeing. It's been frustrating, and the few
posts I've made in the last week have probably shown that
frustration.

Not only that, but in head-to-head comparisons with the G2, I may
not get the same level of detail in portraits with the Canon, I've
found the G2 to be fairly effortless in getting quality shots.
That's important to me with active children that I'm trying to take
photos of and enjoy their company at the same time.

It's hard to tell how this story would have ended if the random
blue syndrome hadn't appeared... RBS, that's my acronym (with
apologies to Ulysses), as I still say it isn't a flaw just confined
to the flash. Maybe I would have kept it, maybe not. The F707 had
some things I liked, but there was still plenty that I did not...
especially when compared to the G2 that I also owned.

I'll miss the following:

1. I warmed to the EVF, though I still think it looks like a VCR
viewfinder
2. Loved the fast startup time
3. Enjoyed the nightframing (though somewhat gimmicky, IMO)
4. Has a better "shutter click" sound
5. Location of the tripod mount
6. Long battery life
7. Loved the longer zoom, and will miss that the most!
8. Last shot preview with the left arrow button
9. Longer movies
10. The laser focus... my kids really love that
11. Quick one-button manual white balance
12. 5MP instead of 4
13. A usable ISO 400 (if it's really ISO 400)

But there are still some things I don't like:

1. Memory sticks... too small and expensive
2. The "green auto mode" seems to only choose shutter speeds of
1/30 and above, and you have to set SCN mode for longer exposures
(will newbies figure this out?)
3. Way too many keystrokes to delete an image... given the smaller
size of the memory sticks, this is essential.
4. Preview of images take too long to load (and holding shutter
button gives a low-quality preview)
5. Zoom button is upside down and inconvenient... no chance of
one-handed operation like the G2.
6. The goofy Sony colors (mostly green and red)... IMO, no excuse
for that.
7. The flash... there's NOTHING to love about the F707 flash (more
below)
8. The camera strap keeps getting twisted because the connectors
swivel 180 degrees (OK, so I'm picky, but that bugs me)
9. My wife thinks it's ugly
10. The CA is still more pronounced
11. The worst implementation of Auto White Balance that I've
experienced on a digicam... and not enough white balance presets
12. No saturation control (in-camera)
13. A constantly smudged LCD.
14. Noisy shadows
15. Blue everywhere

Then there were the G2 features that I didn't think I could live
without:

1. RAW format
2. Chris Breeze's Downloader Program
3. The microdrive (can you say "sweet"?)
4. The tilt-swivel LCD
5. The IR remote
6. The 420EX flash and the hotshoe
7. Multiple focus zones
8. Colors that are correct and white balance that works (for the
most part)
9. Almost no noise

About that flash situation... the blue-shift isn't near as bad as
the fact that all photos must be done at full aperture with the
flash. For me, that's deadly. The HVL-F1000 flash makes the Vivitar
283 look like a BMW. The cold shoe left me... well, cold. And then
there's the blue shift that appears mostly with the flash, but in
daylight, too.

The kicker for me was when I took both cameras to a "Team Building"
event at work for my employees. With the G2, I just kept happily
snapping away, and managed to fire off over 200 pictures with the
internal flash without thinking of running out of space. With the
F707, I had two 128 meg sticks and constantly worried of running
out of memory. In fact, I did run out before the day was done, and
that was bad.

Then looking at the pictures revealed more... the G2 shots were
nearly all perfectly exposed. The F707 shots were not nearly as
good... over 3/4 had some sort of blue-shift, and the detail
difference wasn't as noticable as when I had lots of time. In fact,
I got more out of focus shots with the F707, and the colors really
bothered me more than I thought they would.

The G2 shots I uploaded to the Internet with no editing, and the
F707 shots required me to edit nearly every one... which took me
over two hours.

Then there was my overall feeling that I developed about the two
cameras. The G2 makes me feel confident that I'll get an acceptable
shot or maybe even an exceptional one, from time-to-time. There's
nothing that really irks me about the camera.

The F707 I knew had more of a chance of an exceptional shot, but
produced a greater number of unacceptable ones. Not only that, but
the obvious flaws in the camera ended up making it a love-hate
relationship for me. It's kinda like that first dent in your new
car... you get a sick feeling, and no matter how hard you try, your
eye keeps going to the flaw.

Finally, I don't think I could bring myself to rewarding Sony with
my dollars, my confidence they'd address the problem, or my
patience. As I've said before, this camera may be ahead of its
time, but that shows in many ways that aren't very appealing. I'll
give a look at the next model, but by then, I expect other
manufacturers to have surpassed the bar that Sony raised and then
dropped.

Most here won't be surprised with my choice, and some will say I
made my decision before I started. I know I can't convince them,
but I really wanted to like this camera. I really feel like I gave
it an open-minded shot, though some will disagree... but it IS my
choice in the end.

I do want to hang around after this goes back. I've developed an
affection for many of you, and I'm wanting to see if Sony addresses
your concerns with this camera. And I'll always be looking at your
photos while thinking what might have been. ;)

Thanks, everyone!

Bryan
 
Welcome back, I wish I could try out some other cameras as well . . . . . .
For right now my G1 is still doing just fine.

Rick
Anyway, it's time for me to come back fully to the Canon camp. The
following is a message I just posted in the Sony Talk Forum
concerning my decision to stay with the G2 and to return the F707
to Sears:
 
Brian, I couldn't agree with you more about the comfort level the G2 provides (not necessarily relative to sonys, but relative to other canon digicams I've used, i.e. s100, g1, pro90). I just shoot away and have nary a concern shots will exposure perfectly, etc. Last weekend I took it out into the cold weather on a hike and for some reason the LCD freaked out on me (best I can describe is the LCD image looks infrared). This was the exact same problem I had the first time I turned on the camera out of the box (and it mysteriously went away after leaving the camera alone for an hour). Other than being annoyed with this viewfinider quirk (er, anyone else have this occasional problem?????), I wasn't too worried about not being able to preview my shots. Sure enough, almost every picture turned out just fine (viewfinder problem also mysteriously gone once back in the warmth of the car)...Tom
 
Hey Bryan,

I too had high expectations for my 707, but as of yesterday, gave up and ordered myself a G2. The funny part is, I probably would have stuck with it if not for the BFS.

I guess great minds think alike.

BTW- what is “Chris Breeze's Downloader Program”?

Thanks,

John
 
Does this mean I can stop agonizing about whether I should keep my G2? :)

Seriously, welcome back & thanks for the comparisons.

Of course, there's that Nikon on the way . . . . Or maybe you'd fancy the E-20?

Alan

Alan
I've probably stirred up enough trouble in the Sony forum, don't
you think? :)

Anyway, it's time for me to come back fully to the Canon camp. The
following is a message I just posted in the Sony Talk Forum
concerning my decision to stay with the G2 and to return the F707
to Sears:

----

I've been pretty quiet for the last week, because I've been trying
to get consistent results from the F707 I bought at Sears and have
been comparing my results with other galleries on this forum. I'm
just not liking what I'm seeing. It's been frustrating, and the few
posts I've made in the last week have probably shown that
frustration.

Not only that, but in head-to-head comparisons with the G2, I may
not get the same level of detail in portraits with the Canon, I've
found the G2 to be fairly effortless in getting quality shots.
That's important to me with active children that I'm trying to take
photos of and enjoy their company at the same time.

It's hard to tell how this story would have ended if the random
blue syndrome hadn't appeared... RBS, that's my acronym (with
apologies to Ulysses), as I still say it isn't a flaw just confined
to the flash. Maybe I would have kept it, maybe not. The F707 had
some things I liked, but there was still plenty that I did not...
especially when compared to the G2 that I also owned.

I'll miss the following:

1. I warmed to the EVF, though I still think it looks like a VCR
viewfinder
2. Loved the fast startup time
3. Enjoyed the nightframing (though somewhat gimmicky, IMO)
4. Has a better "shutter click" sound
5. Location of the tripod mount
6. Long battery life
7. Loved the longer zoom, and will miss that the most!
8. Last shot preview with the left arrow button
9. Longer movies
10. The laser focus... my kids really love that
11. Quick one-button manual white balance
12. 5MP instead of 4
13. A usable ISO 400 (if it's really ISO 400)

But there are still some things I don't like:

1. Memory sticks... too small and expensive
2. The "green auto mode" seems to only choose shutter speeds of
1/30 and above, and you have to set SCN mode for longer exposures
(will newbies figure this out?)
3. Way too many keystrokes to delete an image... given the smaller
size of the memory sticks, this is essential.
4. Preview of images take too long to load (and holding shutter
button gives a low-quality preview)
5. Zoom button is upside down and inconvenient... no chance of
one-handed operation like the G2.
6. The goofy Sony colors (mostly green and red)... IMO, no excuse
for that.
7. The flash... there's NOTHING to love about the F707 flash (more
below)
8. The camera strap keeps getting twisted because the connectors
swivel 180 degrees (OK, so I'm picky, but that bugs me)
9. My wife thinks it's ugly
10. The CA is still more pronounced
11. The worst implementation of Auto White Balance that I've
experienced on a digicam... and not enough white balance presets
12. No saturation control (in-camera)
13. A constantly smudged LCD.
14. Noisy shadows
15. Blue everywhere

Then there were the G2 features that I didn't think I could live
without:

1. RAW format
2. Chris Breeze's Downloader Program
3. The microdrive (can you say "sweet"?)
4. The tilt-swivel LCD
5. The IR remote
6. The 420EX flash and the hotshoe
7. Multiple focus zones
8. Colors that are correct and white balance that works (for the
most part)
9. Almost no noise

About that flash situation... the blue-shift isn't near as bad as
the fact that all photos must be done at full aperture with the
flash. For me, that's deadly. The HVL-F1000 flash makes the Vivitar
283 look like a BMW. The cold shoe left me... well, cold. And then
there's the blue shift that appears mostly with the flash, but in
daylight, too.

The kicker for me was when I took both cameras to a "Team Building"
event at work for my employees. With the G2, I just kept happily
snapping away, and managed to fire off over 200 pictures with the
internal flash without thinking of running out of space. With the
F707, I had two 128 meg sticks and constantly worried of running
out of memory. In fact, I did run out before the day was done, and
that was bad.

Then looking at the pictures revealed more... the G2 shots were
nearly all perfectly exposed. The F707 shots were not nearly as
good... over 3/4 had some sort of blue-shift, and the detail
difference wasn't as noticable as when I had lots of time. In fact,
I got more out of focus shots with the F707, and the colors really
bothered me more than I thought they would.

The G2 shots I uploaded to the Internet with no editing, and the
F707 shots required me to edit nearly every one... which took me
over two hours.

Then there was my overall feeling that I developed about the two
cameras. The G2 makes me feel confident that I'll get an acceptable
shot or maybe even an exceptional one, from time-to-time. There's
nothing that really irks me about the camera.

The F707 I knew had more of a chance of an exceptional shot, but
produced a greater number of unacceptable ones. Not only that, but
the obvious flaws in the camera ended up making it a love-hate
relationship for me. It's kinda like that first dent in your new
car... you get a sick feeling, and no matter how hard you try, your
eye keeps going to the flaw.

Finally, I don't think I could bring myself to rewarding Sony with
my dollars, my confidence they'd address the problem, or my
patience. As I've said before, this camera may be ahead of its
time, but that shows in many ways that aren't very appealing. I'll
give a look at the next model, but by then, I expect other
manufacturers to have surpassed the bar that Sony raised and then
dropped.

Most here won't be surprised with my choice, and some will say I
made my decision before I started. I know I can't convince them,
but I really wanted to like this camera. I really feel like I gave
it an open-minded shot, though some will disagree... but it IS my
choice in the end.

I do want to hang around after this goes back. I've developed an
affection for many of you, and I'm wanting to see if Sony addresses
your concerns with this camera. And I'll always be looking at your
photos while thinking what might have been. ;)

Thanks, everyone!

Bryan
 
Of course, there's that Nikon on the way . . . . Or maybe you'd
fancy the E-20?
I am kinda wondering about the Nikon 5000, but when you can't find a Nikon user to say anything good about it, you have to be cautious. :)

I do fancy the E-20, but don't think my wallet could touch it.

Bryan
 
I am kinda wondering about the Nikon 5000, but when you can't find
a Nikon user to say anything good about it, you have to be
cautious. :)
Yeah, the Nikon 5000 looked initially promising, but then you notice the lens specs. Only f2.8-f4.8 which is woefully slow (what's the point of a 1/4000 shutter speed with a lens that slow?). And whilst the 28mm wide angle is nice, the 85mm telephoto doesn't cut it (especially as here we all are saying how we wish the G2's 102mm could be extended).

And with it's flip-out LCD it seems to be a G2 wannabe for the Nikon diehards ;)
I do fancy the E-20, but don't think my wallet could touch it.
Ditto. Looks like a killer camera ... but at a killer price.

Cheers
Martin
 
Bryan,

You've echoed what I've come to appreciate about the G2. I get consistently good results, and frequently great results. The images seldom need any work in PS, except for a sharpening action that I run on them. I have yet to run down a battery. And the LCD is quite useable outside in sunlight, unlike the other digicams I've owned or tried. Oh, and I like the shutter sound on the G2. :-) Ok, I admit I've never heard the F707's.

You worked much harder at making your choice than I did, and you've helped many others with their decisions along the way I'm sure. It's been fun watching your decision process, and I came out of it feeling somewhat vindicated in my decision too.

So I wish you great success with your G2 - it is a great little camera!
 
Well Bryan you did a great job at comparing both cameras and I am sure it was totally fun. But I really didnt think you could live with the sony flash compared to the 420ex. I also do mostly people indoor shots and love canons flash.
 
Just for the record you said (What is sony thinking no preflash for manuel white balance) well guess what Nikon doesnt have it either if you set the manuel white balance on the Coolpix 995 and use the flash guess what you have blue pictures. Amazing!!!!!!!
 
Bryan, you showed consummate patience with the F707. I was wondering how long you'd last with the RBFS. Just to think if Sony had RAW the white balance problems would be academic and everybody (nearly) would be happy.

The painful part of this exercise is to see folks get so defensive about their camera purchase and jump on any criticism as troll behaviour. I thought your comments were quite candid. I am careful to never make directly dispariging remarks about a particular camera on the STF, although I generally am admiring of their digicams and their technology. I have recommended Sony camera to some friends if I felt their experience level fit that camera. I know your intentions were constructive and I'm sorry if you felt your words misinterpreted. I hope everthing goes uneventtully at Sears.
Regards, Mike K
 
Bryan,

Thanks.... for the great work and samples. I have been trying to decide between the 2 cameras and with out any to compare, Ive had to rely on reviews...and somewhat non-biased information.

Today, I went to circuit city and actually played with both cameras, and I like the feel of the G2. Just seems to fit. Looks like out with my Cp950 and in with the G2.

Again Thanks,
Andy
I've probably stirred up enough trouble in the Sony forum, don't
you think? :)

Anyway, it's time for me to come back fully to the Canon camp. The
following is a message I just posted in the Sony Talk Forum
concerning my decision to stay with the G2 and to return the F707
to Sears:

----

I've been pretty quiet for the last week, because I've been trying
to get consistent results from the F707 I bought at Sears and have
been comparing my results with other galleries on this forum. I'm
just not liking what I'm seeing. It's been frustrating, and the few
posts I've made in the last week have probably shown that
frustration.

Not only that, but in head-to-head comparisons with the G2, I may
not get the same level of detail in portraits with the Canon, I've
found the G2 to be fairly effortless in getting quality shots.
That's important to me with active children that I'm trying to take
photos of and enjoy their company at the same time.

It's hard to tell how this story would have ended if the random
blue syndrome hadn't appeared... RBS, that's my acronym (with
apologies to Ulysses), as I still say it isn't a flaw just confined
to the flash. Maybe I would have kept it, maybe not. The F707 had
some things I liked, but there was still plenty that I did not...
especially when compared to the G2 that I also owned.

I'll miss the following:

1. I warmed to the EVF, though I still think it looks like a VCR
viewfinder
2. Loved the fast startup time
3. Enjoyed the nightframing (though somewhat gimmicky, IMO)
4. Has a better "shutter click" sound
5. Location of the tripod mount
6. Long battery life
7. Loved the longer zoom, and will miss that the most!
8. Last shot preview with the left arrow button
9. Longer movies
10. The laser focus... my kids really love that
11. Quick one-button manual white balance
12. 5MP instead of 4
13. A usable ISO 400 (if it's really ISO 400)

But there are still some things I don't like:

1. Memory sticks... too small and expensive
2. The "green auto mode" seems to only choose shutter speeds of
1/30 and above, and you have to set SCN mode for longer exposures
(will newbies figure this out?)
3. Way too many keystrokes to delete an image... given the smaller
size of the memory sticks, this is essential.
4. Preview of images take too long to load (and holding shutter
button gives a low-quality preview)
5. Zoom button is upside down and inconvenient... no chance of
one-handed operation like the G2.
6. The goofy Sony colors (mostly green and red)... IMO, no excuse
for that.
7. The flash... there's NOTHING to love about the F707 flash (more
below)
8. The camera strap keeps getting twisted because the connectors
swivel 180 degrees (OK, so I'm picky, but that bugs me)
9. My wife thinks it's ugly
10. The CA is still more pronounced
11. The worst implementation of Auto White Balance that I've
experienced on a digicam... and not enough white balance presets
12. No saturation control (in-camera)
13. A constantly smudged LCD.
14. Noisy shadows
15. Blue everywhere

Then there were the G2 features that I didn't think I could live
without:

1. RAW format
2. Chris Breeze's Downloader Program
3. The microdrive (can you say "sweet"?)
4. The tilt-swivel LCD
5. The IR remote
6. The 420EX flash and the hotshoe
7. Multiple focus zones
8. Colors that are correct and white balance that works (for the
most part)
9. Almost no noise

About that flash situation... the blue-shift isn't near as bad as
the fact that all photos must be done at full aperture with the
flash. For me, that's deadly. The HVL-F1000 flash makes the Vivitar
283 look like a BMW. The cold shoe left me... well, cold. And then
there's the blue shift that appears mostly with the flash, but in
daylight, too.

The kicker for me was when I took both cameras to a "Team Building"
event at work for my employees. With the G2, I just kept happily
snapping away, and managed to fire off over 200 pictures with the
internal flash without thinking of running out of space. With the
F707, I had two 128 meg sticks and constantly worried of running
out of memory. In fact, I did run out before the day was done, and
that was bad.

Then looking at the pictures revealed more... the G2 shots were
nearly all perfectly exposed. The F707 shots were not nearly as
good... over 3/4 had some sort of blue-shift, and the detail
difference wasn't as noticable as when I had lots of time. In fact,
I got more out of focus shots with the F707, and the colors really
bothered me more than I thought they would.

The G2 shots I uploaded to the Internet with no editing, and the
F707 shots required me to edit nearly every one... which took me
over two hours.

Then there was my overall feeling that I developed about the two
cameras. The G2 makes me feel confident that I'll get an acceptable
shot or maybe even an exceptional one, from time-to-time. There's
nothing that really irks me about the camera.

The F707 I knew had more of a chance of an exceptional shot, but
produced a greater number of unacceptable ones. Not only that, but
the obvious flaws in the camera ended up making it a love-hate
relationship for me. It's kinda like that first dent in your new
car... you get a sick feeling, and no matter how hard you try, your
eye keeps going to the flaw.

Finally, I don't think I could bring myself to rewarding Sony with
my dollars, my confidence they'd address the problem, or my
patience. As I've said before, this camera may be ahead of its
time, but that shows in many ways that aren't very appealing. I'll
give a look at the next model, but by then, I expect other
manufacturers to have surpassed the bar that Sony raised and then
dropped.

Most here won't be surprised with my choice, and some will say I
made my decision before I started. I know I can't convince them,
but I really wanted to like this camera. I really feel like I gave
it an open-minded shot, though some will disagree... but it IS my
choice in the end.

I do want to hang around after this goes back. I've developed an
affection for many of you, and I'm wanting to see if Sony addresses
your concerns with this camera. And I'll always be looking at your
photos while thinking what might have been. ;)

Thanks, everyone!

Bryan
 
I do fancy the E-20, but don't think my wallet could touch it.

Bryan
What's wrong with the E-10? You can pick one up for $1250 or so. I bought one for less, but I don't think it's going to ever ship!
 
I just want to comment a few your words, since I've owned both cams for about a week too.
1. I warmed to the EVF, though I still think it looks like a VCR
viewfinder
Agree, but what's wrong with having a VCR viewfinder... I don't know. I really will miss it (already missing). I got used to EVF+manual focus - worked just great for me.
2. Loved the fast startup time
A-ha! Lots of people were laughing at me when I was saying that this was going to be one of the most features of F707 I will love. And when I got F707, I was totally happy with it's startup times. Shutter lag (with manual focus and exposure lock) in F707 is also a bit faster, especially when both cams have their LCDs turned off.
3. Enjoyed the nightframing (though somewhat gimmicky, IMO)
Yea, probably this might be important for some, but I haven't found a use for this.
4. Has a better "shutter click" sound
What? ;-) I love G1/G2 sound. Sounds more serious, mature ;-)
5. Location of the tripod mount
6. Long battery life
7. Loved the longer zoom, and will miss that the most!
8. Last shot preview with the left arrow button
Oh these 4 features are really awesome! 100% agree.
9. Longer movies
Don't use.
10. The laser focus... my kids really love that
Just wanted to add that it reliably works only within 7-9 feet. (rough estimate)
11. Quick one-button manual white balance
Agree. Just wanted to add that with F707 you'll have to use it a lot more often than with G2.
12. 5MP instead of 4
Printed lots of full res pictures at 8x10", didn't see any differnece. So... I am holding on to my old words: sony's "pixel value" is less that G2's. But it has a little bit more pixels, so their detail levels are even.
13. A usable ISO 400 (if it's really ISO 400)
Generally, yes. Depends on the subject.
1. Memory sticks... too small and expensive
But a lot more convenient, also I liked the way you insert/remove MS from/to F707, did you? Also, I keep saying this: do you always really need all 5MP and super-fine? For vacation spapshots I will be using G2's 1600x1200 with super-fine and I'll get the excellent 5x7" prints.
2. The "green auto mode" seems to only choose shutter speeds of
1/30 and above, and you have to set SCN mode for longer exposures
(will newbies figure this out?)
Shutter priority works too (in fact, that my favorite mode).
5. Zoom button is upside down and inconvenient... no chance of
one-handed operation like the G2.
Oh yeah... Also I occasionally kept pressing it (when replacing memory sticks or when simply holding camera in my hands)
6. The goofy Sony colors (mostly green and red)... IMO, no excuse
for that.
101% agree. greens, reds and cyans are way off the originals.
7. The flash... there's NOTHING to love about the F707 flash (more
below)
Didn't use.
8. The camera strap keeps getting twisted because the connectors
swivel 180 degrees (OK, so I'm picky, but that bugs me)
Didn't notice.
9. My wife thinks it's ugly
Mine loved it.
10. The CA is still more pronounced
Hm... Don't care.
11. The worst implementation of Auto White Balance that I've
experienced on a digicam... and not enough white balance presets
Hm... Auto white balance was always (as I though) Sony's strong side. For outdoors Sony's auto white balance works (IMHO) very well. Not worse than G2's. Indoors ALL cameras suck in auto white balance, but F707 sucks even when using 'indoor' preset. But on the other hand, manual setting is neat, as you noted.
12. No saturation control (in-camera)
I don't use it with G2 and never used it with G1. But Sony cams need it badly.
14. Noisy shadows
My second biggest complain (after crazy reds and weak cyans). I still trying to get a word from imaging-resource, how could they calim that F707 had the less noice ever?! It's a lot noisier than G1, which is a year old! You just got to zoom at 100% to notice that.
The F707 I knew had more of a chance of an exceptional shot, but
produced a greater number of unacceptable ones. Not only that, but
the obvious flaws in the camera ended up making it a love-hate
relationship for me.
100% agree. Overall, I have to say that your conclusion is very close to mine.
 
Bryan,

Ultimately, I know the REAL truth! You just couldn't imagine breaking our trend of buying the same digicam stuff, could you? :-)

Honestly, I tried my hardest not to bud in too much with your decision-making process... even though iit was clear to me early on (after your first comparison shots, actually) that the 707 was not for me. I had a feeling that the larger zoom might win you over, but also knew you would be frustrated by quite a few things on the 707. I just appreciate the time and effort you presented to us all by making the comparison. I probably would have done the same thing as you if I had the resources to do it...

Hey, did you ever get a chance to do any ISO testing to find out how accurate the ISO figures are with these two cameras? Do you still plan on doing that before you return the 707?

Also, you mentioned RAW in your post.... does this mean you are giving RAW a second chance too or do you still plan on sticking with JPG? Like you, I was initially turned off by it because of the slow processing time and terrible Canon software. But truly, Downloader and Breezebrowser making working with RAW... well, a BREEZE! :-) Still takes some time to convert, but at least you can preview the images first and customize them to your liking!

Ok, it's almost 3 in the morning and I need to go to bed. I upgraded to Windows XP today and just finished installing a bunch of software (I did a clean install). So far, everything is working good: I am successfully using Downloader, Breezebrowser, ACDSee, QImage, and Photoshop Elements.

Travis
 
The images seldom need any work in PS, except for a sharpening
action that I run on them.
I agree with what you're saying. Just want to add: the more I learn photoshop, the harder it becomes to find a cam whose images I'll accept without editing them in Photoshop. ;-))

For all 3x digital zooms I will need PS to blur the background on the portraits, for example.

http://pbase.com/image/299288
 
Ok, it's almost 3 in the morning and I need to go
to bed. I upgraded to Windows XP today and just finished
installing a bunch of software (I did a clean install). So far,
everything is working good: I am successfully using Downloader,
Breezebrowser, ACDSee, QImage, and Photoshop Elements.
What about your printer drivers? A friend of mine cannot use his HP PhotoSmart 1100. I though that you can use Win2000 printer drivers for XP. Is that true? Thanks!

Sorry for the offtopic.
 
Yeah, I hear some posters over there now refer to the BFS problem also as that Bryan "F* ng" Siverly. ;)

Just kidding, I found a lot of people agreed with you but there are some Sony die-hards. I find Canon G2 users much more reasonable and less defensive about their product. Could be we have a better product and less to prove.
I've probably stirred up enough trouble in the Sony forum, don't
you think? :)
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top