Life in the 'old dog' yet......

raptor50

Active member
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Location
UK
This isn't a very exciting thread as I don't have much to say but I do read the Kodak SLR forum often and feel guilty for not contributing, someone may read this!

I use an SLR/n at work just about every day. When I read some of the negative posts/comments about it I sometimes think about 'retiring' it and start daydreaming about what to buy as a replacement.

When I then go back in to the studio or out on location I am so busy getting on with the job it isn't until I have returned, finished the PP and sent the images to my client that I remember I was thinking about 'upgrading' to something else.

I suppose what I am trying to say is that the SLR/n is a perfectly capable, everyday pro camera than can easily be used to make a worthwile living. Get someone to put it in a head to head battle (test) with the latest XYZ Mk2 and it would probably be embarrassing, but in the 'real' world my SLR/n is there every morning waiting for me to plug it in and switch on (I use it tethered in the studio) or be packed up with it's two (original) batteries which will last me all day and many shots, and hiked off to somewhere on location.

It has gone through rain, chemical smoke, icy conditions, hot humid conditions, longhaul flights in cargo bays and so on and guess what, it's always there waiting for me to plug it in........etc etc!

I no longer get excited by the beast (I love opening the box and playing with new toys!!) but (excluding my bad composition or other mess up) I am always very happy with the images it produces and the clients seem to be too as my business is strong and they keep coming back for more.

To finish then, whatever Kodak is up to now, whatever critics say about 'me old mate', I am grateful it and the 14n came to market when they did and at the price they did (I actually bought this one second hand with approx 3500 actuations on it, I bought a 14n new when they first came out). The excitment has gone to be replaced with familiarity and trust (as much as you can trust a mechanical/electronic device) and a feeling of well being. There will be a day soon when I will buy something else, but very much as an addition rather than a replacement.

There, I feel better now!

Thanks for reading if you got this far!!
 
Raptor,
Thanks for reading if you got this far!!
Yes I actually got through your entire post! I think it is safe to say that most of us who are still using the various flavors of the SLR (mine's the n) are happy with the results. I've learned to avoid backlight or strong reflected light off water cause that results in monumental color artifacts but in good natural light or controlled studio conditions as you report it does get it done.

So far nothing else has come along that I'm seriously considering. As long as the prints are good and nothing breaks I'll stick with the beast for now!
--
Pete Smith
http://www.photographsbypetersmith.com
http://www.pbase.com/petersmith/
 
I keep an eye on all the cameras coming out but the standard to which they are judged is against my 14n. I recently bought and returned the D200, just wasn't happy with the color or noise (funnily enough). Other cameras I have owned or own...D1x, S2, S1, D2h, 1d, 20d sigh...the best images I produce are all with the 14n.
 
There, I feel better now!

Thanks for reading if you got this far!!
Yup. Sure did! ;-) For one moment, I thought I was about to read yet another eulogy, but I am glad I was proved wrong here! :-)

Obviously you are very fond of your faithful friend, and it came as some additional reassurance for me having not had a very happy experience with my brand new slr/n as of July last year! Let's hope the hardware gremlins are now sorted and that I too can look forward to a long and fruitful friendship as you have with yours. Thanks for taking the trouble.

--
Kind regards,
Nigel

A bad workman always blames his tools. But in the light of all that I have written above, I am definitely blaming my keyboard!
 
Hi Colin-

I couldn't agree with you more. We have two photographers, two 14/Nx's, one SLR/n. We shoot an average of 6 hours a day of commercial work. Location, products, people, studio, etc. even architecture. Love our cameras and PhotoDesk. Don't see much of an improvement in anything on the market to make it financially sound to switch systems. The only lure is medium format backs, but the cost is still out of line for us.

Take care

Richard
 
I have been very pleased with my 14n , then nx. The body isn't so great but its been reliable and has made me a lot of money. I have gone to a Canon 1dsmk2 mainly because I'm worried about servicing & replacement and to have some srt of backup , its nice to have a pro body again too .

But image quality wise there is almost nothing in it , the 14nx is still capable of state of the art images and I still get moire with the Canon, perhaps not as often , and the colour of the 14nx is still much easier to work with.
 
As somebody who used his Kodak SLR almost on a daily basis (studio and location) i wouldnt dream of changing to another make SLR.

my next camera will have to have least 22mp - otherwise everything else would be a backwood step.

regards

GR
 
I believe the closer you worked with manual cameras [medium and large format] the better suited the Kodak looks. It begins to fall apart if your work was 35mm film based.

I've always gotten good results, shooting weddings, because my style is more portrait than photojournalistic. ISOs of 100 - 400 were all I shot with film. As I experiment more with available light and moving subjects [as I did with high ISO BW film], the camera become unusable due to poor focusing and noise.

It's eye-opening to read some of the other forums. They are evaluating images at 1600 and 3200 at this point. It's really easy to see how some camps love the camera and others simply laugh at it.

--
Rick

We all know what it can't do. Show me what you can do with it.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top