Unda:
This subject has been beaten to death around here (polls, arguments, etc.).
Hence, my "oh no". ;-)
It happens on any camera with a preflash from time to time, with some subjects, in some conditions.
Niikon? Here's someone mentioning how Nikon made the newer D200 much better than the D70 in this area:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=16387743
Sony?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1009&message=8115805
Canon?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1031&message=6170137
It happens.
But, it's not a big deal. My best guess is that only about 2 or 3 out of a hundred people are going to react to it in some conditions.
If it's a big deal to you, Auto Thyristor flashes are cheap on the used market, and an adapter for the 5D hotshoe is only around $20 so it can use a flash with an ISO standard hotshoe.
Is the preflash that big of a deal for me using the built in flash. Nah. Can some people react to one? Yes, my niece seems to be sensitive to one in darker conditions. A girl I was taking photos of in a dark tavern had a problem with it, too. But, other people I took photos while there didn't have a problem with it.
I've got lots of flash photos of a lot of people that are not impacted by a preflash.
Also, let's keep things in perspective. People do blink from time to time, even without any external stimulation.
So, not every photo is going to be perfect, even if you're not using a flash (and not everyone reacts the same way to a preflash from what I've seen).
What seems to be happening in this forum regarding this issue is sad (it's been blown way out of proportion, with every blink in a photo being blamed on preflash.
It's an issue on any model that uses one in some conditions, with some subjects.
Manufacturers made design compromises with Digital. The flash systems could use some improvement (but, so could a lot of other areas). It would not be a high priority for me, if I was controlling R&D at KM.
--
JimC
------
http://www.pbase.com/jcockfield