Reading mode: Light Dark

Lisa porn post - likely suspect

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phil Askey
  • Start date Start date
Go to last post
As a newcomer to this forum, I, too, was surprised at the bikini shot - not that I don't admire and like to photograph the body beautiful. But the photo I encountered here had a "sneaky" feeling to it - not the exibition of photo skills, as much as exhibition of a particular body. There's a difference.

Personally, I would not object to truly classic nudes, partially clothed, or whatever - tastefully done. But even more, I support our editor/moderator's discretion of what's in and what's out. What's "art" and what isn't - must remain his decision, here.

I'm sure all of us realize the tremendous pull that sexuality has - and how easily this forum can be derailed by it. I support our moderator's decision to keep us on the track.
 
George Lowry said:
As a parent of 13 & 15 y/o daughters, I can imagine a time when
Frances will encounter a fat old unreasonable SOB like myself while
snapping these creepy pics. A heartfelt counseling session ensues.
Click to expand...
When you talk about creepy pics, are you talking about the prono or the bikini shots??
 
Frances has dissapointed me. The bikini pictures were far enough. This is pornography. My 11 year old son looks at the pictures here sometimes. Luckily he was in school when this happenned. Jerry

p.s. Phil, What cameras do you have in house??
 
JohnM said:
George Lowry said:
As a parent of 13 & 15 y/o daughters, I can imagine a time when
Frances will encounter a fat old unreasonable SOB like myself while
snapping these creepy pics. A heartfelt counseling session ensues.
Click to expand...
When you talk about creepy pics, are you talking about the prono or
the bikini shots??
Click to expand...
were these pictures just of girls in bikinis or move revealing and tasteless

and did you block frances from sending messages to the forum as he has not responded to this post about him and if he has what did he say in his defense and has he been removed from using this site

i have not seen the pics not that i want to but it is a nice clean site with lots of information and i hope it stays that way for along time
 
These were xxx porno pics of a well endowed black man and a white lady.Several pics and poses. They came up when you opened the post which read "5000 images posted look!!
were these pictures just of girls in bikinis or move revealing and
D_MAC said:
tasteless
and did you block frances from sending messages to the forum as he
has not responded to this post about him and if he has what did he
say in his defense and has he been removed from using this site
i have not seen the pics not that i want to but it is a nice clean
site with lots of information and i hope it stays that way for
along time
Click to expand...
 
Jerry said:
JerryO said:
tasteless
and did you block frances from sending messages to the forum as he
has not responded to this post about him and if he has what did he
say in his defense and has he been removed from using this site
i have not seen the pics not that i want to but it is a nice clean
site with lots of information and i hope it stays that way for
along time
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
I have enjoyed the posts and pix from Frances, except for the voyeuristic bikini shots. Definitely behind Phil in exercising his discretion and authority on this.
It is refreshing to see reasonable standards set and enforced.

I'm another Dad who would be prone to causing photographer damage if I caught someone snapping surreptitious shots of my daughter.
FJBrad
 
Hi Phil,

As webmaster of a fairly large site myself I applaud your actions and appreciate the position you are in. The fact is that this site has it's rules and guidelines and whether or not a person is happy with them or totally agrees with them is irrelevant. A visitor agrees to follow the rules and guidelines when they choose to participate in the forum discussions. I do not find Frances posts offensive at all but I respect your authority as webmaster and so should Frances. If he wants to post his bikini images online he could do so on one of the many sites that cater to that. I stand behind you 100% If a person can't follow the rules of a site they visit, they are free to move on.

Jeff
 
Jeff you did not see his XXX PORNO and I mean PORNO post this morning. Phil deleted it . Jerry
JeffT said:
Hi Phil,

As webmaster of a fairly large site myself I applaud your actions
and appreciate the position you are in. The fact is that this site
has it's rules and guidelines and whether or not a person is happy
with them or totally agrees with them is irrelevant. A visitor
agrees to follow the rules and guidelines when they choose to
participate in the forum discussions. I do not find Frances posts
offensive at all but I respect your authority as webmaster and so
should Frances. If he wants to post his bikini images online he
could do so on one of the many sites that cater to that. I stand
behind you 100% If a person can't follow the rules of a site they
visit, they are free to move on.

Jeff
Click to expand...
 
No I didn't. I would not have been offended if I had but I do agree that stuff does not belong on these forums. There are places for such things and here is not one of them.
Jeff
 
JeffT said:
No I didn't. I would not have been offended if I had but I do agree
that stuff does not belong on these forums. There are places for
such things and here is not one of them.
Jeff
Click to expand...
I agree, I am fairly new this forum and I didn't like seeing these voyeurs shots either.....
I would be ashamed to take 'em and post 'em!

Alfonso Bresciani

http://www.pompo.com
 
Jeff, just curious.... what would it take to be offensive?
JeffT said:
No I didn't. I would not have been offended if I had but I do agree
that stuff does not belong on these forums. There are places for
such things and here is not one of them.
Jeff
Click to expand...
 
If I'd clicked on that link and those photos opened and one of my grand daughters sitting beside me like they sometimes will do, I would be one p* ed off man! And, it takes a lot for me to get that way! Frances, I can't believe you did that! Man, what are you thinking? I'm told there are a lot of sites that this would be considered normal on, but HERE! I have nothing against these sites, but that doesn't belong here. PERIOD!!
Jarrell Conley
Phil Askey said:
Just so everyone is aware, this morning I received a threatening
email from Frances because I blocked him from embedding images due
to very childish posts on Open Talk, his email was:

From: Franco Marco (hotmail account)
Subject: If I see my next post of an image as a....

Body:
link you will regreet it trust me!

--------
I know many of you appreciate Frances's photography, as do I (at
least the normal stuff) he has been warned many times to stop
posting his voyeur bikini pictures.. I took a stand on this and
this is his response.
Click to expand...
 
I might sound silly but really very curious to see the images Frances posted this morning. He is clearly contesting Phil's positions as owner of this site.
I do want to see for myself how and at what level he achieved.
Amy
Jerry said:
JeffT said:
Hi Phil,

As webmaster of a fairly large site myself I applaud your actions
and appreciate the position you are in. The fact is that this site
has it's rules and guidelines and whether or not a person is happy
with them or totally agrees with them is irrelevant. A visitor
agrees to follow the rules and guidelines when they choose to
participate in the forum discussions. I do not find Frances posts
offensive at all but I respect your authority as webmaster and so
should Frances. If he wants to post his bikini images online he
could do so on one of the many sites that cater to that. I stand
behind you 100% If a person can't follow the rules of a site they
visit, they are free to move on.

Jeff
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Amy said:
Jerry said:
JeffT said:
Hi Phil,

As webmaster of a fairly large site myself I applaud your actions
and appreciate the position you are in. The fact is that this site
has it's rules and guidelines and whether or not a person is happy
with them or totally agrees with them is irrelevant. A visitor
agrees to follow the rules and guidelines when they choose to
participate in the forum discussions. I do not find Frances posts
offensive at all but I respect your authority as webmaster and so
should Frances. If he wants to post his bikini images online he
could do so on one of the many sites that cater to that. I stand
behind you 100% If a person can't follow the rules of a site they
visit, they are free to move on.

Jeff
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Well Jarrell I don't find them offensive I suppose because I would not bother me to view them on the appropriate site however I suppose I do find it a bit disturbing to take a photo of someone who has no idea that they are being photographed. What I am trying to say is that I do not really find nudes or pornography offensive if it is kept in an appropriate and controlled environment. I would not want my kids to see it and I would be upset if I saw someone taking pictures of my teenage daughter without permission.

Jeff
 
Amy the first two pictures involved fellatio between a female and a male. I bailed out quickly since I was at the office. All I need is to get busted for visiting a porno site! "Really boss, it is a digital photography site! Honest!"

Get the idea? Yes, the level achieved was very low. Okay?
Rich
Member said:
Amy said:
I might sound silly but really very curious to see the images
Frances posted this morning. He is clearly contesting Phil's
positions as owner of this site.
I do want to see for myself how and at what level he achieved.
Amy
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Wake up people.

Apparently Frances signed up as a spoof person 'Lisa' and posted hardcore porno live on the forum.

Frances clearly didn´t take these pictures himself, but ripped them from a hardcore XXX site. There was nothing artistic about these images, trust me.

I am not as much offended by the graphic nature of those images as I am of the act itself. It´s childish behaviour at its worst.

I repeat: This was not the candid bikini shots you see in Frances gallery. This post was a troll attack.

Mathias
Jarrell Conley said:
Phil Askey said:
Just so everyone is aware, this morning I received a threatening
email from Frances because I blocked him from embedding images due
to very childish posts on Open Talk, his email was:

From: Franco Marco (hotmail account)
Subject: If I see my next post of an image as a....

Body:
link you will regreet it trust me!

--------
I know many of you appreciate Frances's photography, as do I (at
least the normal stuff) he has been warned many times to stop
posting his voyeur bikini pictures.. I took a stand on this and
this is his response.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Like Buses
2
Replies
29
Views
43
Travis Butler
Travis Butler
Jacques Cornell
FRAUD WARNING
Replies
7
Views
8
Tom_N
T
R
  • User review User review
Well rounded
2 3
Replies
42
Views
5K
RLight
R
Martin Ocando
Retrospective: Before DPReview
2 3
Replies
57
Views
58
Bobby J
B
B
Creating Books
Replies
7
Views
8
EllieBrnson
EllieBrnson

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top