***Mini-Challenge 94 -- Windows, Pt. 3***

ArminB

Senior Member
Messages
1,547
Reaction score
0
Location
DE
Challenge closes midnight GMT (That's 7:00 p.m. U.S. EST) on Wednesday, December 21.

Here's the link to Part 1, where you can get all the rules, etc., as well as view the wonderful entries: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1010&message=16267566

link to part II http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1010&message=16315687
--
~ Armin
- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -
Please visit my galleries at
http://www.pbase.com/arminb
'cause I'm eager to learn from you and your comments. Tnx.
~ my PAD: http://www.pbase.com/arminb/pad
 
Thanks to flowersand and rodbam for taking time to comment on my pictures and thanks for the technique advise on the first picture (The Dungeon): it was taken handheld on a EOS300D/Tamron 28-300 @ ISO1600/f5 & 1/160 (the best compromise I could find in the dark). I think I focused on the black window in the background.

I regret not having cropped the annoying right hand side of the picture before submitting it.

The triangle-shaped building is in the controversial Federation Square, Melbourne.

MauSca
 
Disclaimer: this is not a personal attack rodbam, its far from it. In fact, it > simply me voicing a slightly different perspective.
This is what I'm on about the toleration of people with different perspectives & or posting styles.
"Its all good," but you missed my most significant reason for liking > photography. Thats OK though, because its "mine" and maybe not > yours. Either way, you missed it rodbam and it shouldn't be lost in the > fray.
I'm not sure what you mean here Scott, what did I miss? I think you mean from reading below that I haven't included the people that are not artistic but have learned the rules of photography & apply these rules to their shots as anyone can do this & not all people can be artistic. I'm fully aware of this & post regularly to these people, I'm defiantly not saying that we all have to strive to be artistic as enjoying a hobby is the most important thing. If one is lucky enough to be artistic that's great.
Again, this is just my humble opinion (JMHO).

It doesn't make it correct or wrong, it simply makes it mine, but I > suspect its not solely mine. BTW, I think that we do not learn the > component I speak of, as we do the technical component of > photography. It was evolving and growing long before we were > introduced to a camera and there is no right or wrong, just different. > Anyway, the basic concepts of photography that must be learned CAN > be learned by anyone. It doesn't take any special ability or some certain > level of intelligence. Its fairly straight forward stuff and if you are smart > enough to learn how to read, then you are smart enough to learn the > basics of photography (from a technical standpoint). I would be willing to > bet the f2 lens on my G6 that everyone participating on this forum > knows how to read. The difference between photos often comes form > outside the technical area. Thats the subjective component, or to use > your terms the "very personal" component.
I agree anyone can learn the basics of photography & good on them, I have nothing against people enjoying photography even if they don't have an artistic bone in their body. I fail to see where you got the impression that I only have time or acknowledge only artistic photographers. I’m normally one of the few including yourself that take the time to encourage the artiiiiisticly challenged:-) More so a year or two ago as very few people commented on other peoples shots or entries that wern't so good but yourself & me always did. The interaction here is very good now.
Haha, this is a great concept. I am sure that there are people that find > different values and appreciation in the photos posted on this forum. I > am not sure if this forum would be better off if everyone looked and > commented on photos from your perspective. I suppose its all a matter > of expertise... or is it personal opinion? I guess sooner or later we will all > get there... or will we? Or better yet... should we? Again, there is a > component of individual taste, so maybe we shouldn't all try to fit in the > same box? :o)
That's my point Scott I don't think we should all fit in the same box regarding posting styles as we are all different & I like to read the differences but with all the IMHO & saying sorry before & after critiquing is why I call it it McDonalds. It's not that I'm impolite it's just that is me.

My wife Mereana has some of the letters I sent her from before we were married & they read just like one of my posts here so I'm not trying to be controversial or just different I'm just being me & will continue to do so.

You will notice that this post is a little more sensible than my normal ones with no emphasis on fun as I'm trying to be serious. My posts to Mickey were in fun with no anger but I meant what I said, I think this is how some people get confused with my posts as they don't know if I'm being serious or joking. When I post like this I'm being serious even with the poor grammar.

There's no real reasoning behind my posting technique it's just that I'm more comfortable writing the way I really talk, whereas this post if I talked like this my friends would think I've gone all posh.

I have no problems with people taking my posts the wrong way but my surprise comes when people who have been reading my posts for years have trouble deciding whether I'm a decent bloke or not, whether I have a good heart, whether I'm rude or not, whether I'm a know all. It's like my last post is the one they judge me on. Do you remember when Max run a challenge & told us off for wasting bandwidth with mini controversies & such, saying that will drive the thread to its limit & he will have to start another thread so we should all be quite. Look at it now we're into the third thread. Most of you would have been polite & followed his wishes but I did my normal thing & told him a few things. Talking is what makes this place interesting & hopefully getting to know each other a little bit as we're now are with you, by you posting an in depth post for the first time I believe. I've really enjoyed the chat & seeing some of your inner thoughts. Thanks mate:-)

I had to delete some of your comments I'm replying to as this post was too big & got rejected.

Regards Rod
 
Commercial art is a sort of art of itself but it aint photography mate. But I do like the first & third shots, especially the third.
Regards Rod
 
Commercial art is a sort of art of itself but it aint photography
mate. But I do like the first & third shots, especially the third.
Regards Rod
Thanks, Rod!

2nd shot, hm, I really like the compo in this 2nd shot and do not know, how to take it in a better way...

It is not a composite, it is a shot through the car wind shield with the main backview mirror in focus. I then selectively converted the content of the mirror into bw to stress that the main view is modern architecture...which directly stands by and contrasts the old building.

Cheers,
~ Armin
- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -
Please visit my galleries at
http://www.pbase.com/arminb
'cause I'm eager to learn from you and your comments. Tnx.
~ my PAD: http://www.pbase.com/arminb/pad
 
It looks like its had more than a B&W conversion as it looks like a line drawing in the mirror. Filters are for cigarettes not picys:-)
Regards Rod
 
It looks like its had more than a B&W conversion as it looks like a
line drawing in the mirror. Filters are for cigarettes not picys:-)
Hm?-) Line drawing? I'm not familiar with that technique, please tell me how it works :)

OK, here's what went into it:

created a 2nd layer by copying the original image, in this copy layer I erased everything but the content in/of the mirror, bw, grain, USM...flattend image and partially smoothed the bw corners.

Cheers
~ Armin
- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -
Please visit my galleries at
http://www.pbase.com/arminb
'cause I'm eager to learn from you and your comments. Tnx.
~ my PAD: http://www.pbase.com/arminb/pad
 
It's like ink drawings done mainly with different length of lines. Which yours isn't but the similarity is no tones at all just pure black & white.
Regards Rod
 
Well I am happy you enjoyed the post...but didn't know it would provoke a marriage proposal! I have to say that I don't think you could put up with me, or vice versa. We would probably kill each other!

Plus, your current missus would probably have a bit of trouble handling me talking in my sleep!

Hugs for the proposal though!!
:)
--

Britt ~ If you don't have a sense of humor, you probably don't have any sense at all. ~

Please visit my pbase ~ no offer refused. (For critiques that is.) :)

http://www.pbase.com/brittfurr/root
 
LOVED "Catching the Squirrel!" How did you do that?

I so ssuck at PS that I have no clue how to do anything except adjust the levels once in awhile.

Guess I need to take a class on photo shop techniques. It's no wonder half my shots bite.

:)
--

Britt ~ If you don't have a sense of humor, you probably don't have any sense at all. ~

Please visit my pbase ~ no offer refused. (For critiques that is.) :)

http://www.pbase.com/brittfurr/root
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top