padeye99656
Senior Member
Augusta wrote:
.
The opposite is true and is more significant. If you diffuse an SB800 enough to evenly illuminate a softbox you'll find it won't produce the same guide number as a B400.
--
'When it's time to shoot, shoot, don't talk'
Tuco - Il Buono, il paparazzo, il cattivo
.
Are you telling me that Nikon has figured out how to make a tiny capacitor hold 150 joules of energy? Quantum makes a 150 joule flash and it is significantly bigger than an SB800 due in part to a much larger capacitor.In mere terms of Power, SB800 does really get the same Light-output
as AB400, as well as also any other Monolight running in the range
of 130-160 "True" Watt/second (Joule); e.g.: Bowens Esprit 125;
SP-Systems Excalibur 1600; Visatec Solo 400B - 150J.
You are comparing different types of reflectors which is not the same as comparing the total light output. Whatever reflector you are using on the Alien Bee isn't as efficient. If you used the same type of parabolic reflector and fresnel lens you'd find the B400 was much more powerful.That simply means, if You are shooting in the night at a whole
building, both an SB800 and an AB400 at full power will require
the-same/very-similar ƒ Aperture and t-Speed setting Exposure.
Also, in respect of their max Light-Power on the field, still I can
compare:
The opposite is true and is more significant. If you diffuse an SB800 enough to evenly illuminate a softbox you'll find it won't produce the same guide number as a B400.
I'm not even sure what this means, could you explain what "capability in millimeters" means?one AB800 ~ 2x-(barely)3x SB800; one AB1600 ~ 4-5x SB800.
Misconception instead is, comparing Flash-tubes' capability in
milli-metres merely.
--
'When it's time to shoot, shoot, don't talk'
Tuco - Il Buono, il paparazzo, il cattivo