Pentax Photo Laboratory , a useful underated tool. IMHO

hcoley

Senior Member
Messages
1,217
Reaction score
19
Location
Salisbury, NC, US
I listened to all the negative reports here about the Pentax Photo Laboratory software and did not use it at all until recently.

It is a very easy and useful tool. Of course it does not have the power of Photoshop CS2 which I also use, but it is quicker and easier, and the results are quite acceptable. Very much so. It is extreemly useful for converting to 16 bit TIFF. With the Pentax software and even the in-camera JPEG, I'm getting better images than I ever did from film most of the time. I do not have my own color film lab like most of us don't. Now I have one on my PC!

In my opinion the Pentax software has not been given a fair shake. Another interesting thing I learned was when applying the Camera Mode settings in the software it applies the same post processing the camera does in those same modes. The software manual does say how each mode adjusts the image settings, but the camera manual does not tell you that the JPEG processing is different in each mode. I confirmed via email with Pentax this week that the Camera applies the same JPEG post processing that the software does. Each mode post processes the image according to that modes purpose. Sharpness, contrast, and saturation are adjusted differently in each mode on the camera. This is why you cannot change those settings on the camera when in those modes.

The software will help you see what the camera will do when you use the modes processing a RAW file.

I really think the JPEG from the camera is way underated too. I've been reviewing some images I took on a trip to Boston when I first got my DS and they look great! I didn't know I had any problems till I started reading posts here. Now that I look at those first images, I had far less problems than I thought I did.
 
I agree with you. I do not own any version of Photoshop yet, so I'm still trying to figure out how to convert photos to b&w with the Pentax Photo Lab software. Have you tried this yet? Can anyone else maybe share their success stories and their conversion process?

Thanks!
 
I agree with you. I do not own any version of Photoshop yet, so
I'm still trying to figure out how to convert photos to b&w with
the Pentax Photo Lab software. Have you tried this yet? Can
anyone else maybe share their success stories and their conversion
process?

Thanks!
Not there as far as I know. I don't convert to B&W. It would be a nice feature for Pentax to add the In-camera filters.

I am still learning PhotShop CS2. So I have converted RAW to 16 bit TIFF with Pentax and edited them in Paint Shop Pro 7 with which I am most familiar now. I tired PSP X and the RAW conversion just does not work right at all. Images come in way underexposed and awfully flat and require extensive post processing. I thought I had a camera problem until I tried Photsop CS2 and even with auto correction turned off the RAW files were just fine.

To convert to B&W easily and have some other pretty cool filters try Picasa by Google. Picasa handles Pentax RAW just fine. Only dowside for me was the only save was to JPEG, which is the reason I started using the Pentax software. Also a cool tool for submitting images online for printing at WalMArt, etc. picasa.google.com
 
I tired PSP X and the RAW conversion just
does not work right at all. Images come in way underexposed and
awfully flat and require extensive post processing.
Hm, I only get awful images when I let PSP do auto-correction. I haven't found any difference between the PSP X processing of RAW and CaptureOne 3.7 which is my main conversion tool, the results is very much the same as I get from PhotoLab.

PSP X uses the same processing algorithms as Raw Shooter Essentials.

Take care
  • R
 
I tired PSP X and the RAW conversion just
does not work right at all. Images come in way underexposed and
awfully flat and require extensive post processing.
Hm, I only get awful images when I let PSP do auto-correction. I
haven't found any difference between the PSP X processing of RAW
and CaptureOne 3.7 which is my main conversion tool, the results is
very much the same as I get from PhotoLab.

PSP X uses the same processing algorithms as Raw Shooter Essentials.

Take care
  • R
I do not autocorrect with PSP. I do with CS2. I can't explain what I get with PSP X. Really bad! RSE works fine!
 
.. It is a very easy and useful tool. Of course it does not have the
power of Photoshop CS2 which I also use, but it is quicker and
easier, and the results are quite acceptable.
...
I don't share your opinion of Pentax Laboratory ... I find it very clumsy and slow to use. If you're using Photoshop CS2, and you want to learn how to process hundreds of RAW files quickly and easily, obtain and read "Real World Camera Raw with Photoshop CS2" by Bruce Fraser. It's far far more efficient once you understand the features that integrate operations with Camera Raw, Photoshop and Bridge.

The fact that Pentax Lab is doing the same JPEG processing that the camera is presents a useful way to compare the settings, though, if you want to use them. However, I've long since come to the conclusion that most if not all of my exposures need to be captured in RAW format and post processed to meet my needs.

Godfrey
 
It's just a fine piece of software with basic and simple interface and feature set. But it seems that some ppls find it to be too simple so that they prefer something else. But the PPL2 provide me more features than I ususally need indeed.

--

Even a thumb can be used as a measurement tool and that's why we get the 'rule of thumb'!

RiceHigh - the Pentax DSLR Measurbator! ;->

http://www.geocities.com/ricehigh

My Gear Items are fully listed in my Profile.
 
As great as CS2 is, it costs more than half of the DL + DC 18-50/3.5-5.6 in my country, so PhotoLab is good since it comes with it. Granted that, it would be even better if the camera shot DNG directly and came bundled with PSE3.

--
Richard with DS + DA 18-55, DA 50-200 @ +0800GMT
left-eyed photography - http://www.richx.org
 
As great as CS2 is, it costs more than half of the DL + DC 18-50/3.5-5.6 in my country, so PhotoLab is good since it comes with it. Granted that, it would be even better if the camera shot DNG directly and came bundled with PSE3.

--
Richard with DS + DA 18-55, DA 50-200 @ +0800GMT
left-eyed photography - http://www.richx.org
 
As great as CS2 is, it costs more than half of the DL + DC
Precisely! I found the Photo Laboratory software to be a nice simple tool. Works great converting to 16bit TIFF. Want more, must pay more. Very decent software included with the camera.
 
Hm, PSP X works fine for me. No problem. I'm happy. :)

But, are you using aRGB or sRGB? I'm using sRGB, but I have seen reports from those with aRGB that they get a bit of "greyish" results with PSP X. Could be something with the built-in colour management, but sRGB works great for me.

Take care
  • R
 
Hm, PSP X works fine for me. No problem. I'm happy. :)
But, are you using aRGB or sRGB? I'm using sRGB, but I have seen
reports from those with aRGB that they get a bit of "greyish"
results with PSP X. Could be something with the built-in colour
management, but sRGB works great for me.

Take care
  • R
Thanks for the tip. I'll check that out.
 
Well - it does its job, but...

Other converters give me more powerfull tools for image tuning, more convenience, more stability.

--



http://zoom.tinkle.lt
 
I agree with you. Photo Laboratory can be a more or less "decent" tool to convert PEF to JPF or TIFF, but, in my opinion:
  • It's very limited. Very poor processing options.
  • The quality of the pics, in terms of resolution, are not better than JPEG from camera.
  • You can extract more from the photo with other free converters, like RSE, if you don't want to pay for a RAW converter. Of course, with non-free RAW converters (C1 or RSP) you can get a lot from the photo too.
I made a small comparison between COne, RSE and Photo Laboratory some days ago where you can read my conclusions. My test were limited to a photo, and maybe more test and comparisons could be done, but it were enough relevant for me.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=15546307

Btw I bought RSP (64€) and I'm very happy with it. Can't be compared to Photo Laboratory, in my opinion.

Regards.
--
Javier.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top