Reading mode: Light Dark

More Samples of the R1

Go to last post
That picture has lots of blue sky, so you won't see much noise there, but look at the shadows and you see all the ugly chroma noise. Generally, people won't use ISO 1600 on a bright sunny day, so a better example would be Phil's examples in the museum. Personally, I found them fairly nasty.

--
The Secret to Life is... Calcium!!
Recent Gallery- http://www.pbase.com/supperman
Older Gallery- http://max-fun.fotopic.net
 
NO CA, I love the light of these pics, very clean and natural, 1600 usable, 800 fine, and 400 great, what a change from my 828. I am selling my 828, and trying to decide whether to leep my D70. This may be the cam I have been waiting for.
 
The last time I gave a though to CA was when I was researching and buying my 828. When I sold it, and got my current lenses, I forgot all about it, as the CA was at worst negligible in the lenses I own. But I can see how gung ho, some who stayed with the 828 would be about that issue.

--
--The artist formerly known as The Krakken
 
I have to admit, I thought the photos in the museum were pretty nasty too but lets faceit, this camera IS NOT going to replace the DSLR. (not saying it won't happen someday but this is not the one). This is a goo d camera i its own right, we'll just have to wait and see what Sony brings out next but this is a pretty good start.
--
Robb


Beware the dark side....unless you can get a really good picture of it!!!!
NAPP Member
 
PS: Someday i'll learn how to type!!!!!
--
Robb


Beware the dark side....unless you can get a really good picture of it!!!!
NAPP Member
 
I agree Sandy! The pictures are so awesome! I love Phil's pics too!!
sandy b said:
NO CA, I love the light of these pics, very clean and natural, 1600
usable, 800 fine, and 400 great, what a change from my 828. I am
selling my 828, and trying to decide whether to leep my D70. This
may be the cam I have been waiting for.
Click to expand...
 
Well, it would replace some dslrs. Namely, the Olympus E300. The R1 pics are WAY better!
FMPhoto said:
I have to admit, I thought the photos in the museum were pretty
nasty too but lets faceit, this camera IS NOT going to replace the
DSLR. (not saying it won't happen someday but this is not the one).
This is a goo d camera i its own right, we'll just have to wait and
see what Sony brings out next but this is a pretty good start.
--
Robb


Beware the dark side....unless you can get a really good picture of
it!!!!
NAPP Member
Click to expand...
 
24mm is the FL equivalent. The real FL of the lens on the wide end is about 14mm. Many are designated this way
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top