Yes, but my question is if you had to start from scratch and as a
suggestion to a person just getting inot DSLR, isn't the D20 route
worth the added expense (since it has a better feel, more features
and longer battery life)?
Joe,
I don't know about the others, and I haven't actually tried a 20D. I came from a 300D, which I opted over the 10D, and invested the money saved into really good lenses (I have 3 all-L lens lineup now). Now that it's time for me to upgrade, 19 months after my first 300D purchase, I really don't regret having chosen the 300D over the 10D. Ditto now with the XT over the 20D. IMHO, the XT is a very capable camera. In fact, when I decided to move up to dSLR from film SLRs and P&S digicams, I was looking for no more than a digital body that will allow me to change aperture and shutter speed, and would even be happy even with no AF. But the 300D more than satisfied my needs (not wants), and I did enjoy shooting with it, even earning a little on the side.
I know that my investment in lenses will last for a long time, probably even for the rest of my life. But spending on dSLR bodies that will be replaced in less than 2 years, I don't think it's worth it. I believe the XT is much more capable than the 10D. Although I was salivating with the 10D before, but now I can smile to myself that I made the right choice with the 300D. The XT now is much much better than the 300D. The features I wished that will be incorporated in the 300D are now in the XT. What more can I ask?
Of course I know that in over a year, an XT upgrade will be around. And I'll probably upgrade, selling my XT as I did to my 300D so I'd raise only a few hundred $$$ more for the upgrade. I'd probably stick with the XT series, not unless the price of 5D or its successors will drop to 20D levels.
Keep shooting!
--
BOBBY TIMONERA, Iligan City, Philippines
http://www.pbase.com/timonera /
http://www.photos.ph/timonera