Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Great taste, great model, great images.
Frances.
keep posting please!
Great taste, great model, great images.
Frances.
keep posting please!
Hi David,Hey all...i am new to this forum...but i wanted to post my first
attempt at model shooting...here is the link...let me know what you
think...
http://www.digitalstars.net/ilyasin.htm
Thanks...
--
David L. Morel
http://www.digitalstars.net/dstargallery.htm
Great taste, great model, great images.
Frances.
keep posting please!
If you have nothing better to do than whine about me...
Grow up Paul.
Great taste, great model, great images.
Frances.
keep posting please!
IF you mean I'm a unbelievable fool your right ..I'm totaly
unbelievable as a fool because I'm not one.I'm certainly not
foolish enough to fail to make a distinction between attacking a
policy and making a personal attack against you which is something
that you appear to be doing here.There is no distinction between
embedding images and posting galleries save your "permission" to do
the latter and as I've quoted "poor is the man who's pleasures
depend on the permissions of another" therefore I don't post
galleries or embed images here at all. I've got plenty ofthings to
do with my time thank you and I am not whineing about you at all
I'm just campaigning against your policy and hypocrisy.Recently the
hypocrisy of your "Sex in the City" promotion with its accompaning
embedded image on the main page no less was raised by another
poster here and I find it amusing to say the least.
The comparison between them is that they both are obviously glamour your rules state no glamour OR nudity which to my mind means both types are not permitted. Are you saying that that pic is NOT a glamour image in style and content?Paul, you're mistaken, I'm surprised you can't remember the content
of your own photographs. How can there be any comparison between
my 100 pixel wide headshot of Kim Cattrall with revealed nothing
more than her shoulders and your virtually nude images (which you
appear to have decided to take down).
I know what you asked and you know that I won't do that because i feel its treating my pictures differently to other types that to my eye are also offensive (birds ...the ultimate in boredom possibly excepting ...flowers) at least to my sensibilities.You know how active our site is and you know how active the forums
are, we give you a free open forum in which to link to your images
and galleries. All I've asked you to do is provide a link rather
than embedding the image into your messages. I really don't think
I was asking for very much.
I never said you banned me or deleted my messages or that you asked impolitely but banning a legitimate style of image is censorship (even if done by a private enterprise)I did not ban you.
I did not delete any of your messages.
I did not censor you.
I asked you politely not to embed and you freaked out.
This is your site but these are not YOUR forums they belong to noone . They are your sites forums for sure but you don't own the thoughts,ideas and expressions of the people that post here and create the content that these forums carry so you might own them in the sense you own the software but without people posting you would have nothing to own so at best you might say you control rather then own.This is my site, these are my forums, I decide on the rules not
you. Those rules are liberal and open and I have a very hands-off
attitude to moderation (compared to some forums).
Let them express their opinions as to what is acceptable and let me express my opinions too by showing my work.Is it not a choice clicking on a link that clearly states D30 Glamour Gallery???....why should it be even nessesary to give further warning then that?.Anyway your origional story was your advertisers would be offended remember? Lets face it that unlikely considering your a photography website and these same advertisers also advertise in print publications that regularly show a lot more explicit content then I or anyone else has ever posted on these forums.We have visitors of all ages from all over the world who have
vastly different opinions as to what is acceptable and what isn't.
We also have people who browse through corporate firewalls or
browse in their office, I'd like them to have the CHOICE to click
through to your site rather than have 640 pixel high images
immediately in their face when they open your message. And that's
ALL I ASKED OF YOU.
Have I not complied with your request not to embed any further images? Where would this alledged disrespect be manifesting itself then? Could you mean please stop protesting my decision and just get on with things? If so say so ... trust me its not something I could condescend to refuse considering the climate here.We provide you a free forum to promote yourself and your
photography the least you can do is show a little respect.
This is your site but these are not YOUR forums they belong to
noone . They are your sites forums for sure but you don't own the
thoughts,ideas and expressions of the people that post here and
create the content that these forums carry so you might own them in
the sense you own the software but without people posting you would
have nothing to own so at best you might say you control rather
then own.
So let me get this right, because I chose to create forums on my
site, developed the software back end, maintain the site, write the
reviews, pay the bills, find the advertisers and keep the entire
thing going from day to day I have no rights to apply a simple set
of liberal rules to those who wish to speak on these forums?
Yeah ok.
I suggest you create your own site with your own galleries, reviews
and discussion forums.
So let me get this right, because I chose to create forums on my
site, developed the software back end, maintain the site, write the
reviews, pay the bills, find the advertisers and keep the entire
thing going from day to day I have no rights to apply a simple set
of liberal rules to those who wish to speak on these forums?
Yeah ok.
I suggest you create your own site with your own galleries, reviews
and discussion forums.
Second I would like to say that while I at first was all for Paul
Popes position since the image he posted I believe was not
explicit, and if I recall less explicit then what can be seen in
most pages of Vogue, Bazaar or any of a host of other non adult
magazines out there. But I see that your decision has turned mr
Pope into a searcher of any possible glamour, sexually orinented or
implied shots on this forum. I can understand him being upset that
you removed or asked him to remove his image but he is now
becomming the person who decides what should and should not be
posted, I am not sure if that is a good direction for him or this
site. I feel he may be doing this site and his original position
more harm than good. Just my opinion anyway. Thanks for the forum
and no offense intended to anyone here, (these forums tend to
offend or be taken the wrong way and I don't want to post 30
responses explaining that i did not mean to offended anyone)
Stephen
http://www.nyphotographics.com
Stephen
Second I would like to say that while I at first was all for Paul
Popes position since the image he posted I believe was not
explicit, and if I recall less explicit then what can be seen in
most pages of Vogue, Bazaar or any of a host of other non adult
magazines out there. But I see that your decision has turned mr
Pope into a searcher of any possible glamour, sexually orinented or
implied shots on this forum. I can understand him being upset that
you removed or asked him to remove his image but he is now
becomming the person who decides what should and should not be
posted, I am not sure if that is a good direction for him or this
site. I feel he may be doing this site and his original position
more harm than good. Just my opinion anyway. Thanks for the forum
and no offense intended to anyone here, (these forums tend to
offend or be taken the wrong way and I don't want to post 30
responses explaining that i did not mean to offended anyone)
Stephen
http://www.nyphotographics.com
I think he's currently trying to bait me into deleting some of his
troll messages and then he would use that against me... I'm sure
he'd love that, but I'd be happy to do so if he continues.
Stephen
Second I would like to say that while I at first was all for Paul
Popes position since the image he posted I believe was not
explicit, and if I recall less explicit then what can be seen in
most pages of Vogue, Bazaar or any of a host of other non adult
magazines out there. But I see that your decision has turned mr
Pope into a searcher of any possible glamour, sexually orinented or
implied shots on this forum. I can understand him being upset that
you removed or asked him to remove his image but he is now
becomming the person who decides what should and should not be
posted, I am not sure if that is a good direction for him or this
site. I feel he may be doing this site and his original position
more harm than good. Just my opinion anyway. Thanks for the forum
and no offense intended to anyone here, (these forums tend to
offend or be taken the wrong way and I don't want to post 30
responses explaining that i did not mean to offended anyone)
Stephen
http://www.nyphotographics.com
Second I would like to say that while I at first was all for Paul
Popes position since the image he posted I believe was not
explicit, and if I recall less explicit then what can be seen in
most pages of Vogue, Bazaar or any of a host of other non adult
magazines out there. But I see that your decision has turned mr
Pope into a searcher of any possible glamour, sexually orinented or
implied shots on this forum. I can understand him being upset that
you removed or asked him to remove his image but he is now
becomming the person who decides what should and should not be
posted, I am not sure if that is a good direction for him or this
site. I feel he may be doing this site and his original position
more harm than good. Just my opinion anyway. Thanks for the forum
and no offense intended to anyone here, (these forums tend to
offend or be taken the wrong way and I don't want to post 30
responses explaining that i did not mean to offended anyone)
Stephen
http://www.nyphotographics.com
