Reading mode: Light Dark

Does PC/processor reduce raw conversion time?

Go to last post
Anthony

Anthony

Senior Member
Messages
1,743
Reaction score
8
Location
Staten Island, US
Just picked up a new PC. Should have it a few days.

Just curious.

New PC:

Athlon 1.4ghz
512 ram
60 gig HD 7200rpm
DVD burner
16/10/40 CD Burner
64meg Nvidia video card

Old PC:

Athlon 600mhz
256 ram
20 gig HD
12/10/32 CD burner
64 meg Gforce video card

Do you like I'll see a performance increase while converting raw files?
What would you add to this system?
 
Yes!

I went from 60sec+ per D30 raw file on my AMD K6-2 450MHz, 192Mb WinME PC down to 13 sec per file on my AMD 1.3GHz Athlon, 512Mb WinME machine. The new machine was initially supplied with the wrong drive (20Gb 5800rpm) and this was 2 sec slower than the 40Gb 7200rpm I have now.

Win2k also seems to give a speed improvement as it appears to make better use of the disk. It's also much more stable than ME - my ME machine crashes at least once a day whereas I've yet to crash Win2K.

I know there are faster machines around but I never buy the fastest available as one model down gives much better price/performance.

Chris
PS I would add a large, good quality monitor
Anthony said:
Just picked up a new PC. Should have it a few days.

Just curious.

New PC:

Athlon 1.4ghz
512 ram
60 gig HD 7200rpm
DVD burner
16/10/40 CD Burner
64meg Nvidia video card

Old PC:

Athlon 600mhz
256 ram
20 gig HD
12/10/32 CD burner
64 meg Gforce video card

Do you like I'll see a performance increase while converting raw
files?
What would you add to this system?
Click to expand...
 
Chris Breeze said:
Yes!
I went from 60sec+ per D30 raw file on my AMD K6-2 450MHz, 192Mb
WinME PC down to 13 sec per file on my AMD 1.3GHz Athlon, 512Mb
WinME machine. The new machine was initially supplied with the
wrong drive (20Gb 5800rpm) and this was 2 sec slower than the 40Gb
7200rpm I have now.

Win2k also seems to give a speed improvement as it appears to make
better use of the disk. It's also much more stable than ME - my ME
machine crashes at least once a day whereas I've yet to crash Win2K.

I know there are faster machines around but I never buy the fastest
available as one model down gives much better price/performance.

Chris
PS I would add a large, good quality monitor
Click to expand...
On that note.....
Any recommendations for a monitor?
Chris Breeze said:
Anthony said:
Just picked up a new PC. Should have it a few days.

Just curious.

New PC:

Athlon 1.4ghz
512 ram
60 gig HD 7200rpm
DVD burner
16/10/40 CD Burner
64meg Nvidia video card

Old PC:

Athlon 600mhz
256 ram
20 gig HD
12/10/32 CD burner
64 meg Gforce video card

Do you like I'll see a performance increase while converting raw
files?
What would you add to this system?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
... I'm looking at upgrading my PC - what kind of motherboard and ram did you get? I'm looking at the Abit KG7 if anyone has heard anything good/bad about it.

THx,

John L.
Anthony said:
Just picked up a new PC. Should have it a few days.

Just curious.

New PC:

Athlon 1.4ghz
512 ram
60 gig HD 7200rpm
DVD burner
16/10/40 CD Burner
64meg Nvidia video card

Old PC:

Athlon 600mhz
256 ram
20 gig HD
12/10/32 CD burner
64 meg Gforce video card

Do you like I'll see a performance increase while converting raw
files?
What would you add to this system?
Click to expand...
 
Anthony,

On the monitor recommendations, check out Cornerstone ( http://www.bigmonitors.com ). Their 19" ones are very cost-effective (c901 for example), and the 21" are excellent too (p1500, etc). Highly reviewed for good text clarity as well.

I have an Athlon 1.2 GHz with 512 Mb RAM, 30 Gb system drive and 2x45 Gb in a RAID-0 array (mostly for video editing), all really fast 7200 rpm drives - these are key. Windows 2000, of course - the only way to go.
  • Mohit
 
Wonderboy over at
http://www.anandtech.com
has great reviews of the motherboards available.
He also review memory and what benefits you could get out of the latest.

Personally, I'm going to stick with PC133 memory as I can swap it around with my other systems and even though RDRAM has better performance, it is not enough to justify the cost difference.

I have built systems with Abit boards, and I have liked them.

Brian.
John L. said:
... I'm looking at upgrading my PC - what kind of motherboard and
ram did you get? I'm looking at the Abit KG7 if anyone has heard
anything good/bad about it.

THx,

John L.
Click to expand...
 
Yuri,

There's hardly any difference in timing between RAW to JPEG, TIFF, TIFF 16-bit or TIFF 16-bit linear on my machine. Raw to JPEG is bit slower than raw to TIFF. Turning off the false colour filter reduces the time to between 7 and 8 secs per raw file.

My 550Mhz AMD K6-2 550MHz, 192Mb RAM, 6Gb HDD, Win2k laptop takes about 37sec per raw D30 file to TIFF.

Chris
Yuri Shabashov said:
Chris Breeze said:
Yes!
I went from 60sec+ per D30 raw file on my AMD K6-2 450MHz, 192Mb
WinME PC down to 13 sec per file on my AMD 1.3GHz Athlon, 512Mb
WinME machine.
Click to expand...
Member said:
20 sec per D30 on my 1GHz 512Mb WinME notebook.
Click to expand...
Chris - I asume D30 raw file to TIFF file. Is it/how much faster
RAW to JPG convertion?

Yuri
Click to expand...
 
I am looking at the Sony E500 21" myself.... Now trying to decide on a video card.

I am also thinking about the Athlon 1.4GHz with 512Mb, I currently am running dual Celerons at 550MHz
Anthony said:
Chris Breeze said:
Yes!
I went from 60sec+ per D30 raw file on my AMD K6-2 450MHz, 192Mb
WinME PC down to 13 sec per file on my AMD 1.3GHz Athlon, 512Mb
WinME machine. The new machine was initially supplied with the
wrong drive (20Gb 5800rpm) and this was 2 sec slower than the 40Gb
7200rpm I have now.

Win2k also seems to give a speed improvement as it appears to make
better use of the disk. It's also much more stable than ME - my ME
machine crashes at least once a day whereas I've yet to crash Win2K.

I know there are faster machines around but I never buy the fastest
available as one model down gives much better price/performance.

Chris
PS I would add a large, good quality monitor
Click to expand...
On that note.....
Any recommendations for a monitor?
Anthony said:
Anthony said:
Just picked up a new PC. Should have it a few days.

Just curious.

New PC:

Athlon 1.4ghz
512 ram
60 gig HD 7200rpm
DVD burner
16/10/40 CD Burner
64meg Nvidia video card

Old PC:

Athlon 600mhz
256 ram
20 gig HD
12/10/32 CD burner
64 meg Gforce video card

Do you like I'll see a performance increase while converting raw
files?
What would you add to this system?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
my findings.

celeron 466
512meg ram
maxtor 7200 rpm hdd
21secs

duron 800 o/c'ed to 966
512meg ram
ibm 75gxp
10secs

athlon 1.2
256meg ram
ibm 75gxp
14secs

...and my new computer
athlon 1.4 o/c'ed to ????
1gig ram
ibm 60gxp
watch this space.
 
John L. said:
... I'm looking at upgrading my PC - what kind of motherboard and
ram did you get? I'm looking at the Abit KG7 if anyone has heard
anything good/bad about it.

THx,
Click to expand...
I'm sorry, but I really haven't the knowledge when it comes to motherboards and upgrades.

I bought a "configure it myself" system from Compaq.
Cost $1463.98

Here's the breakdown:

Presario 7000 Series

Upgrade from 256MB to 512MB for FREE through 9/23/01! See memory category below to select.
1.4 GHz AMD Athlon™ Processor
512MB PC2100 (2 DIMMs) DDR SDRAM
60.0GB UltraDMA (7200 RPM) Hard Drive
Special Promotion! DVD-R/RW & CD-RW Combo Drive W/One Media
Microsoft Home Suite
Microsoft Windows Millennium Edition
Monsoon MH-500 speakers w/ Subwoofer Promotion - ONLY $1!
One year FREE MSN Internet Service - Offer good through 9/5/01
Compaq Starter Kit (Bronze)
56K ITU v.90 Modem
Sound Blaster Live! Value 5.1
64MB SDR nVidia GeForce2 MX w/ TV- OUT
3.5" 1.44 MB diskette drive
Compaq Smart Credit Card Internet Keyboard
Compaq Scroll Mouse
Digital Video Center (4 IEEE-1394 and 4 USB ports), StudioDV and DVDit! Software
1yr parts/ 1yr labor/ 1yr on-site
FREE 10/100 Ethernet PCI Card Included!
 
Tony,

Call me at work.

Alex
Anthony said:
Just picked up a new PC. Should have it a few days.

Just curious.

New PC:

Athlon 1.4ghz
512 ram
60 gig HD 7200rpm
DVD burner
16/10/40 CD Burner
64meg Nvidia video card

Old PC:

Athlon 600mhz
256 ram
20 gig HD
12/10/32 CD burner
64 meg Gforce video card

Do you like I'll see a performance increase while converting raw
files?
What would you add to this system?
Click to expand...
 
Is there a particular reason your system drive is not your RAID array? I would think it advantageous to have your apps, swap space, etc on the RAID array...

Andrew
Mohit Chadha said:
Anthony,

On the monitor recommendations, check out Cornerstone
( http://www.bigmonitors.com ). Their 19" ones are very
cost-effective (c901 for example), and the 21" are excellent too
(p1500, etc). Highly reviewed for good text clarity as well.

I have an Athlon 1.2 GHz with 512 Mb RAM, 30 Gb system drive and
2x45 Gb in a RAID-0 array (mostly for video editing), all really
fast 7200 rpm drives - these are key. Windows 2000, of course -
the only way to go.
  • Mohit
Click to expand...
 
Win XP also gives you a little boost in speed for some reason. I am running a PIII 500 with 384mb of Ram. I run WIN 2000 Server and WIN XP RC1 as dual boot.

Win 2000 RAW Conv Time: 42 sec
Win XP RAW Conv Time: 36 seconds

Not a huge difference, but add that to your system with the higher memory and faster CPU and it may make a big difference.

Kevin
http://www.firestorm.com
Chris Breeze said:
Win2k also seems to give a speed improvement as it appears to make
better use of the disk. It's also much more stable than ME - my ME
machine crashes at least once a day whereas I've yet to crash Win2K.

I know there are faster machines around but I never buy the fastest
available as one model down gives much better price/performance.

Chris
PS I would add a large, good quality monitor
Anthony said:
Just picked up a new PC. Should have it a few days.

Just curious.

New PC:

Athlon 1.4ghz
512 ram
60 gig HD 7200rpm
DVD burner
16/10/40 CD Burner
64meg Nvidia video card

Old PC:

Athlon 600mhz
256 ram
20 gig HD
12/10/32 CD burner
64 meg Gforce video card

Do you like I'll see a performance increase while converting raw
files?
What would you add to this system?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
acassino,
acassino said:
Is there a particular reason your system drive is not your RAID
array? I would think it advantageous to have your apps, swap space,
etc on the RAID array...
Click to expand...
I needed the speed of the RAID primarily for my video editing - DV firewire transfers and real-time transitions (Pinnacle DV500) which doubles the throughput requirements. My system drive is one of the faster 7200 rpm drives out there (you'll notice that not all 7200 rpm drives have the same performance), so it suffices for my needs.
  • Mohit
 
Anthony said:
Yarc is giving me 28 sec times to convert from raw to 8 bit tiff
files.

Would I improve on that too?
Click to expand...
Yes, it should also be faster. Actually, every application depending primarily on CPU power will be faster (like kernel compilation, photoshop filter, 3D rendering w/ 3D studio max, raw conversion, etc.). Just make sure you have enough RAM and a fast HDD. On the other hand, games are often limited by the graphic card when you play in a high resolution...

Shabok
 
Hi Chris,

Still happy with the programme :)

Bit old my kit I suppose. I have ASUS A7V MB with 800Mhz Athlon TBird, 784Mb 133Mhz RAM, 2 x 20.5 Western Digital HD's running at 7200, and I convert from RAW at between 7 and 8 secs to 8-bit tiff with colour filter off.

I'm happy with that.
Chris Breeze said:
There's hardly any difference in timing between RAW to JPEG, TIFF,
TIFF 16-bit or TIFF 16-bit linear on my machine. Raw to JPEG is bit
slower than raw to TIFF. Turning off the false colour filter
reduces the time to between 7 and 8 secs per raw file.

My 550Mhz AMD K6-2 550MHz, 192Mb RAM, 6Gb HDD, Win2k laptop takes
about 37sec per raw D30 file to TIFF.

Chris
Yuri Shabashov said:
Chris Breeze said:
Yes!
I went from 60sec+ per D30 raw file on my AMD K6-2 450MHz, 192Mb
WinME PC down to 13 sec per file on my AMD 1.3GHz Athlon, 512Mb
WinME machine.
Click to expand...
Chris Breeze said:
20 sec per D30 on my 1GHz 512Mb WinME notebook.
Click to expand...
Chris - I asume D30 raw file to TIFF file. Is it/how much faster
RAW to JPG convertion?

Yuri
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Bryan said:
Hi Chris,

Still happy with the programme :)

Bit old my kit I suppose. I have ASUS A7V MB with 800Mhz Athlon
TBird, 784Mb 133Mhz RAM, 2 x 20.5 Western Digital HD's running at
7200, and I convert from RAW at between 7 and 8 secs to 8-bit tiff
with colour filter off.

I'm happy with that.
Click to expand...
sorry should add - I keep RAW on drive C and convert to tiff on drive D.
Bryan29453 said:
Chris Breeze said:
There's hardly any difference in timing between RAW to JPEG, TIFF,
TIFF 16-bit or TIFF 16-bit linear on my machine. Raw to JPEG is bit
slower than raw to TIFF. Turning off the false colour filter
reduces the time to between 7 and 8 secs per raw file.

My 550Mhz AMD K6-2 550MHz, 192Mb RAM, 6Gb HDD, Win2k laptop takes
about 37sec per raw D30 file to TIFF.

Chris
Yuri Shabashov said:
Chris Breeze said:
Yes!
I went from 60sec+ per D30 raw file on my AMD K6-2 450MHz, 192Mb
WinME PC down to 13 sec per file on my AMD 1.3GHz Athlon, 512Mb
WinME machine.
Click to expand...
Bryan29453 said:
20 sec per D30 on my 1GHz 512Mb WinME notebook.
Click to expand...
Chris - I asume D30 raw file to TIFF file. Is it/how much faster
RAW to JPG convertion?

Yuri
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top