Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
design the ugliest looking digital camera to date? I honestly don't
understanding what they are doing - except perhaps accelerating
towards the edge of a large cliff.
--
regards
e
Well seeingas there are no specifications yet or sample images, I can only comment on its poor looks - which probably equates to poor ergonomics. Although I may be jumping the gun here. It DOES have a cyclops look about it though.I don't really care what my camera looks like, I care more about
what the images look like that come out of the camera.
What? Better video capture? IS - quite a few cameras have that. The "unique" Kodak system.....These two cameras offer some very unique features not seen in any
other non DSLR cameras to date
So will I.I will watch with great interest as they get used and reviewed and
that is from a Kodak non-fan !
Have you got shares in in Kodak?Great stuff Kodak - innovation - bring it on.
Why so bitter ? Cheer up man.Have you got shares in in Kodak?
--
regards
I know. I read it.There are two cameras in the news item btw.
If all you can do is spit out your dummy, then why bother commenting.Read it again - maybe you are so blinded by your one eyed approach
based on it's "looks"
I am thinking...... of not buying one of these. $599 gets a good DSLR with kit lens, or a very good Sony/Panasonic/Fuji/Canon etc. I really hope that underneath the skin Kodak have a brilliantly designed camera - but based on past experience, I doubt it. Lets see what the reviews bring.I'll let you have a think....
Jeez, you got out of the wrong side of the bed.If all you can do is spit out your dummy, then why bother commenting.Read it again - maybe you are so blinded by your one eyed approach
based on it's "looks"
I'm not bitter at all. I'm just skeptical.Why so bitter ? Cheer up man.Have you got shares in in Kodak?
--
regards
Fair enough. It was a wise-crack that you obviously took seriously.I enjoy seeing companies trying innovation. If it fails I don't
care as I have no financial interest in them
That's a good start.24 mm wide angle lens
Depends on the buffer size whether RAW will be usable in the real world. Panasonic FZ30 does RAW too and has a hotshoe.Record RAW files and include a hot shoe
Nice. Canon/Olympus/Nikon/Minolta all make dedicated flashguns that support this too.KODAK P20 Zoom Flash
Use and IR trigger or hotshoe adapter. Not a deal breaker.PC sync port for off-camera flash options
Buy a video camera.VGA video at 30 frames per second (Motion JPEG compression) with
the unique ability Use full optical zoom
Cut, splice and merge clips on the camera
Electronic viewfinder. All it is a very high resolution one.RAW file and uniquely embeds a dynamic JPEG
2.5-inch, high-resolution LCD; a 237,000 pixel electronic
viewfinder with diopter
Tons of competition at this price point. I think it will struggle.556 g and 4.6W x 3.8H x 3.6D in
At the price point many want priced at $599 and $499
Yes. Everyone loves a dead hero.Well you have to admire their courage in bringing out something
like this
Hmmm. No it's not. At best it's for 3 or 4 years.A camera is for life, not just for Christmas.