-
Welcome to the new forums! Please read this first. For known issues we are working to resolve, click here.
=Lady at the Pool..(PS)=
- Thread starter Frances
- Start date
joergen52851
Member
- Messages
- 20
- Reaction score
- 0
Thank you - Frances.
CP995-TC-E2 and Photoshop!
aloha-Frances.
B
Beth
Guest
Frances,
You continually amaze! This is a great shot. The sharp face floating on the surface and the impressionistic body under the water are mesmerizing! Beautiful color. Keep them coming!
Beth
You continually amaze! This is a great shot. The sharp face floating on the surface and the impressionistic body under the water are mesmerizing! Beautiful color. Keep them coming!
Beth
CP995-TC-E2 and Photoshop!
aloha-Frances.
Thanks Beth!
Frances.
Frances.
CP995-TC-E2 and Photoshop!
aloha-Frances.
Curt A
Senior Member
Hi Frances,
Really beautifully done photo. Did you know the "model"? I'm sure she would be honored to have a copy of this artistically stunning photo. Curt A.
Really beautifully done photo. Did you know the "model"? I'm sure she would be honored to have a copy of this artistically stunning photo. Curt A.
CP995-TC-E2 and Photoshop!
aloha-Frances.
No I did not....shhhhh...:O)
Thanks Curt.
Frances.
Thanks Curt.
Frances.
CP995-TC-E2 and Photoshop!
aloha-Frances.
Curt A
Senior Member
Woops!!! I should have phrased my question differently. ;-) Sorry bout that! Curt A.
P
Phil Askey
Guest
Which makes it a voyeur shot.. so you'd be ok with me deleting it then Frances?
Voyeuristic pictures - We DO NOT allow posting of voyeur pictures, posting of such images will lead to messages being deleted and if repeated a ban for the poster
Voyeuristic pictures - We DO NOT allow posting of voyeur pictures, posting of such images will lead to messages being deleted and if repeated a ban for the poster
Chris Harlow
Leading Member
Nice shot and in this case the post processing and manipulation significantly adds to it.
Would it not have been better to reduce the saturation of the cyan over the bikini? This has much less water depth and should not, therefore, be the same colour as in the open water around her.
Chris
Would it not have been better to reduce the saturation of the cyan over the bikini? This has much less water depth and should not, therefore, be the same colour as in the open water around her.
Chris
Richard46393
Well-known member
Beautiful picture. I'm just beginning and admire what can be done both with the camera and photoshop.
Richard
Richard
CP995-TC-E2 and Photoshop!
aloha-Frances.
M
Matt Walsh
Guest
technically yes, it suppose it IS voyeuristic. BUT.... (and there always is, isn't there? 
Doesn't each photo have to be evaluated on it's own merits? Because there IS a grey area isn't there? Can no photo appear without the consent of the subject(s)? Example: If I take a photo of my wife sitting 20ft away on the beach, and after developing, I see in the periphery of the photo a woman in a tiny bikini....
I guess what I'm trying to say is that in policing these photos (which I don't envy you for having to do - but also which you do get paid for) it has to be on a case by case basis and is subjective. Just because there is a bikini in the shot doesn't necessarilly make it 'voyeuristic' in the offensive sense of the word.
In this particular case, I think a sponsor would BUY this shot - though only edited as well as it is. I can TOTALLY envision this photo being in an advertisement for iced-tea or a cruise line or something!!!
just my opinion
matt
http://pbase.com/mattywalsh/
Doesn't each photo have to be evaluated on it's own merits? Because there IS a grey area isn't there? Can no photo appear without the consent of the subject(s)? Example: If I take a photo of my wife sitting 20ft away on the beach, and after developing, I see in the periphery of the photo a woman in a tiny bikini....
I guess what I'm trying to say is that in policing these photos (which I don't envy you for having to do - but also which you do get paid for) it has to be on a case by case basis and is subjective. Just because there is a bikini in the shot doesn't necessarilly make it 'voyeuristic' in the offensive sense of the word.
In this particular case, I think a sponsor would BUY this shot - though only edited as well as it is. I can TOTALLY envision this photo being in an advertisement for iced-tea or a cruise line or something!!!
just my opinion
matt
http://pbase.com/mattywalsh/
Voyeuristic pictures - We DO NOT allow posting of voyeur pictures,
posting of such images will lead to messages being deleted and if
repeated a ban for the poster
P
Phil Askey
Guest
Frances takes these shots DELIBERATELY to test my 'gray area', if I delete them he makes a fuss and a huge debate follows, if I don't delete them he gets progressively worse 'but look at all these others I've posted, you didn't say anything then'.
Doesn't each photo have to be evaluated on it's own merits?
Because there IS a grey area isn't there? Can no photo appear
without the consent of the subject(s)? Example: If I take a photo
of my wife sitting 20ft away on the beach, and after developing, I
see in the periphery of the photo a woman in a tiny bikini....
I guess what I'm trying to say is that in policing these photos
(which I don't envy you for having to do - but also which you do
get paid for) it has to be on a case by case basis and is
subjective. Just because there is a bikini in the shot doesn't
necessarilly make it 'voyeuristic' in the offensive sense of the
word.
In this particular case, I think a sponsor would BUY this shot -
though only edited as well as it is. I can TOTALLY envision this
photo being in an advertisement for iced-tea or a cruise line or
something!!!
just my opinion
matt
http://pbase.com/mattywalsh/
Voyeuristic pictures - We DO NOT allow posting of voyeur pictures,
posting of such images will lead to messages being deleted and if
repeated a ban for the poster
allfake51427
Member
- Messages
- 17
- Reaction score
- 0
Why do you let this guy bother you?
Kick him out!
allfake
Kick him out!
allfake
Doesn't each photo have to be evaluated on it's own merits?
Because there IS a grey area isn't there? Can no photo appear
without the consent of the subject(s)? Example: If I take a photo
of my wife sitting 20ft away on the beach, and after developing, I
see in the periphery of the photo a woman in a tiny bikini....
I guess what I'm trying to say is that in policing these photos
(which I don't envy you for having to do - but also which you do
get paid for) it has to be on a case by case basis and is
subjective. Just because there is a bikini in the shot doesn't
necessarilly make it 'voyeuristic' in the offensive sense of the
word.
In this particular case, I think a sponsor would BUY this shot -
though only edited as well as it is. I can TOTALLY envision this
photo being in an advertisement for iced-tea or a cruise line or
something!!!
just my opinion
matt
http://pbase.com/mattywalsh/
Voyeuristic pictures - We DO NOT allow posting of voyeur pictures,
posting of such images will lead to messages being deleted and if
repeated a ban for the poster
M
Matt Walsh
Guest
yeah - i can empathize with both of you...
the grey area is a tough place to live....
"man who stands in middle of road gets hit by cars from both ways"
the grey area is a tough place to live....
"man who stands in middle of road gets hit by cars from both ways"
Doesn't each photo have to be evaluated on it's own merits?
Because there IS a grey area isn't there? Can no photo appear
without the consent of the subject(s)? Example: If I take a photo
of my wife sitting 20ft away on the beach, and after developing, I
see in the periphery of the photo a woman in a tiny bikini....
I guess what I'm trying to say is that in policing these photos
(which I don't envy you for having to do - but also which you do
get paid for) it has to be on a case by case basis and is
subjective. Just because there is a bikini in the shot doesn't
necessarilly make it 'voyeuristic' in the offensive sense of the
word.
In this particular case, I think a sponsor would BUY this shot -
though only edited as well as it is. I can TOTALLY envision this
photo being in an advertisement for iced-tea or a cruise line or
something!!!
just my opinion
matt
http://pbase.com/mattywalsh/
Voyeuristic pictures - We DO NOT allow posting of voyeur pictures,
posting of such images will lead to messages being deleted and if
repeated a ban for the poster
P
Phil Askey
Guest
I've tried.. he just finds another anonymous proxy server and starts posting even worse images.. What can you do if someone is REALLY determined.
Thanks Chris....maybe so, but the in the original the bathing suit was hust like that.
Thanks.
Frances.
Thanks.
Frances.
Thanks.....for your kind words.
Frances.
Frances.
CP995-TC-E2 and Photoshop!
aloha-Frances.
That's Ok in my book is a candid shot...then I did a little art in P.S!
aloha_Frances.
aloha_Frances.
You are the "Boss Phil"...do as you please!
But I don't see anybody complaining at my "Master Piece"(art w/Photoshop).
regards.
Frances.
But I don't see anybody complaining at my "Master Piece"(art w/Photoshop).
regards.
Frances.
Voyeuristic pictures - We DO NOT allow posting of voyeur pictures,
posting of such images will lead to messages being deleted and if
repeated a ban for the poster
Keyboard shortcuts
- f
- Forum