Reading mode: Light Dark

Young Lovers

Go to last post
my shots are completely clothed and a single person... AND not called young lovers which is a sexual reference. This has nothing to do with men or women and if you read my other posts you would have read my words about a double standard. Also, If my photo post offended anyone and they brought it to my attention I would have the courtesy to apologize and not post like that in the future.
--



http://homepage.mac.com/barlisbre/Menu4.html
http://www.pbase.com/barlisbre/root
 
If you are going to live by the rules you need to play by the rules.

"Glamour / Nude / Bikini pictures - Please do not embed such images in your messages, while we understand that such pictures (tastefully shot) are a big part of commercial photography we do have a worldwide audience and wide range of paying advertisers. If you wish to bring a gallery of such images to peoples attention then please just post a link. We will not allow nude / semi-nude pictures of children or links to such galleries."

--
http://www.joesimages.com
 
Hey,

Yes, one could say such image is on the age, and if that is you, then report it and have it removed. I am not going to raise helle because of you complaining either nor would I call you a turkey for not having a taste for it.

Although, this lady has no other men or woman near her for any type of insinuation and she is not breast naked either... My wife still breast feed my youngest 1.3 year old and she very much has that look so that is nothing out of the norm for him to see that, very nature indeed...
 
The sad things is that who may have the last word is not necessary the one that is correct or have the truth but that who may be a big mouth and manipulator or words and meanings... So, the replies of the groupies means nothing...

And like the said, these individuals have so much dirt inside of them that don't you ever dear to open their mouths because they will spill it all out and in tactful ways...
 
Glamour / Nude / Bikini pictures - Please do not embed such images in your messages, while we understand that such pictures (tastefully shot) are a big part of commercial photography we do have a worldwide audience and wide range of paying advertisers. If you wish to bring a gallery of such images to peoples attention then please just post a link. We will not allow nude / semi-nude pictures of children or links to such galleries."

Sorry, that's the rule.

--
http://www.joesimages.com
 
RodneyBlair said:
Where I'm from...
calling someone a turkey have about the same meaning as dude,
homie, home boy, etc. If my desire had been to insult, I would
have maybe wrote idiots instead.
Click to expand...
Where I'm from "fruitcake" has an innocent meaning but that doesn't make the term any less insulting to some others.

The offense doesn't require "desire", Rodney, you really are a coward to try and hide behind semantics.
 
That's funny, open my mind? The fact is this is causing an issue because it is two mailes. If the person standing behind the male without the shirt was a woman, no one would say a thing...but since it is two guys and most likely doesn't conform to your and the others religious or personal beliefs. And I've never seen such a group of whiney people getting upset for being called a "turkey". Sheesh.
brent collins said:
Can you read! As I said, if I broke the rules and a person or
persons had issue with my photos I would IMMEDIATLEY apologize and
remove the pics. I think Rodney take some nice picture, but this
one was posted to titillate and get attention based on sexuality.
Open your mind and see the truth.
--



http://homepage.mac.com/barlisbre/Menu4.html
http://www.pbase.com/barlisbre/root
Click to expand...
--
http://www.joesimages.com
 
NO it has nothing to do with being two males. If you want to spend time researching my past post, I've also made it clear that a post with a female was not appropriate. Sometimes people need to think before they speak. I don't like to name call, but man the stupidity and lack of abitliy to understand the english language is unbelievable here.
--



http://homepage.mac.com/barlisbre/Menu4.html
http://www.pbase.com/barlisbre/root
 
......the bottom line is we need many different viewpoints for creativity, and name calling while intially providing release from frustration, is overall counter- produtive for a creative forum.......goodeye
--
williamwgood.com
 
Man you just are not getting it. I do not have a problem with the picture from Rodney or the one you linked. It's a matter of the rules here and if SOME people might be offended. Rights we have in the world don't apply to a private website. A lot of what I shoot could never be posted here and I understand that. If I recall correctly Rodney posted a young man in only briefs a while back. Clearly a violation of the rules....there are lots of people here who embed women in rule breaking attire and I would love to see Phil have the ability to police the whole thing more. Some post have been pulled in the past. If I posted a well lit corpse from a violent crime scene would it be ok? By the rules yes, but I know it would offend some so I would not post it no matter how great the shot might be. Post with a link. Rodney could have easily done just that, but he chose the selfish "look at me" approach.
--



http://homepage.mac.com/barlisbre/Menu4.html
http://www.pbase.com/barlisbre/root
 
RodneyBlair said:
I don’t know why you feel the need to police my activity on here,
but it really annoys me.
Click to expand...
Oh, my, the great Rodney who holds himself above all criticism, is annoyed. You may have noticed that you in turn have annoyed a few others here. But, of course, that's different - at least in your mind.
RodneyBlair said:
I’ve posted an image which I asked if
anyone has suggestions and that is the topic here. Those who want
to make it a lifestyle discussion are the ones who should apologize
to the participants of this forum.
Click to expand...
I said nothing about your image. You posted an insulting remark that called a large group of innocent people "turkeys" because they don't share your lifestyle and I (and some others) called you on it.
RodneyBlair said:
I’m quite appreciative to those who have offered suggestions and
you’ll see that in my responses to them.

Go bother someone else!
Click to expand...
Go insult someone else. I go where I please and couldn't care less what you think of it.
 
gwprovost said:
I said nothing about your image. You posted an insulting remark
that called a large group of innocent people "turkeys" because they
don't share your lifestyle and I (and some others) called you on it.
Click to expand...
Share my lifestyle? I take a picture of some dudes and that means I have a lifestyle??

You crack me up!

--
Homepage: http://www.rodneyblair.com

 
Are you even reading my posts before you relpy??? IT DOES NOT MATTER IF I THINK THEY ARE OK. If some are offended and feel the rules are broken then we should be sensitive to that fact. Use better judgment when posting that's all. If this was the first time I couldn't care less, but it's not. I don't want to be a cop here, but why is it so hard to just add a link and a subtle warning for those less open to sexuality photos? Why? Because some think they are entitled. It's rude, selfish and insensitive to others. There is a great photographer on these forums who shoots his wife, Wanda, and so many other subjects. The guy is truly gifted. Anyway he post links to his wife's photos. Why? Because he's a caring person on these forums.
--



http://homepage.mac.com/barlisbre/Menu4.html
http://www.pbase.com/barlisbre/root
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top