x530 retrospectives

As I was saying. Also, printing with the x530 is stunningly good
when you consider the number of locations. This is also consistent
with our SD9/SD10 experience.
The number of sensors in the X530 is 4.5 million, slightly more than the
number of sensors in the a520. This is the number you shall compare to
when it comes to complexity and also RAW file size.

So ... in this respect they are rather similar. They also have about the same price.

The Foveon sensors are colocated per pixel - which means that they catch less spatial information. Whether that is a good choice or not depends of course on the result.

Personally I think Bayer interpolation works rather good in practice and cannot really see the problems that motivate three times more detectors per spatial sample.

If anyone comes up with a pure RGB 3 layer camera with the same kind of noise characteristics (per sensor) as a Bayer camera - then things might change. But - I am not sure.
You wonderad about the reason for my post. The main reason is that
I am curious about what makes people defend their pet technolgy no
matter what.
But that was not what you asked anywhere. Here is your entire first
posting. Please point me to the question.
OK
And lastly - why did those Foveon fans don't see that the camera
was in practice useless?
Not well put maybe - I must confess. "Useless" would rather be "non competetive".

But - if it is demanded of people that post here that everything they write must be top notch - I don't think many posts will pass. Neither here - nor in any forum.

Roland
 
In my eyes - the quality of the a520 (and all other modern P&S
cameras) is so way better than the x530 that I would not even think
about buying the x530.
You may be right that you, and maybe some others, would not even think about buying an x530. But for the rest of us, we might want to think, and we might want to do that after we have some relevant information on both image quality and pricing.

Your thread of "naysaying" is not unique, but tiresome.

j
 
You may be right that you, and maybe some others, would not even
think about buying an x530. But for the rest of us, we might want
to think, and we might want to do that after we have some relevant
information on both image quality and pricing.
If the price were lower and the image quality more consistent with the better samples we've seen, I'd consider getting one just for the novelty of it. In fact, if there's a way to control them by PC, I'd be interested in getting two for machine vision research.

At $399, I think it's hard to justify on photographic grounds.

--
Ron Parr
FAQ: http://www.cs.duke.edu/~parr/photography/faq.html
Gallery: http://www.pbase.com/parr/
 
Hello Roland,

Of course I did look at the lions picture. For me, it is very smeared wherever the colours are gold or brown, in the grasses or one lion's face. I think it is the low red resolution plus the haze processing Canon uses. The image does look better than the other grass pictures because with the telephoto the stalks are larger and more uniform in the frame.

If you look at the image half size, it is more pleasing, but the detail is not there according to colour.

Imagining the owner won't mind it, I've put up a slightly sharpened version of the x530 meadow. I invite you to look at the grass tips over the water for detail. This sharpening would certainly look better against the raw than the original already showing jpg artifacts- in fact I masked the skyline in order not to further accentuate the worst of those.

Nothing is perfect in the world, of course. Nor do we need to be.

I wish you enjoyment of your images, where I am sure there is a lot to enjoy.

I am using a small Bayer myself until the Sigma opportunity matches my opportunity. I don't fool myself about what that can do either, but I enjoy the pictures.

http://www.pbase.com/narrbl/image/42232636



Regards,
Clive
 
"But if you knew MY background, my history of accomplishments and the number of significant product introductions that are attached to my name, you'd apologize."

But that is the beauty of an internet forum Steve. We are all equal. Some may think they are more equal than others though .... But that's ok too.

Cheers,

Marcel
 
I just spent several hours cleaning up, rearanging, deleting, and doing a little postprocessing on some of the older images taken when I first got my SD10.

There was clearly a real learning curve. Many of my first images left a lot to be desired. But there was a definite improvement. Almost all of my first IRs were deleted. I note however Seng just gave me a tip this weekend on shooting IR that seems very promising.

And lots of other folks in this forum have helped me in many ways. Even if they were not directed at me posts by Dom, Lin, Rick, (not to mention Seng) and a host of others have provided great tips that have consistently produced better images from my SD10.

While I never used one I understand the SD9 had an even harder learning curve than the SD10.

Sure the images from the WWL thing are not real great. From what I have seen the lens may be the worst part. But then I remembered a recent post about the new Nikon D2 I linked to in another thread. The reviewer said the D2 was one of the most unforgiving recording instruments he had ever used. The sensor showed evey flaw in the lens, every shake in the photographers hand. The lens may not be as bad as some reports. It may just be that the sensor captures more CA than other sensors.

Would I buy one at MSRP, probably not, but at a street price a couple of months from now if they are rereleased maybe, not sure.
 
Marcel

I have been tracking this and a couple of other threads on the Sigma forum, and you can see my "contributions" on them since I felt sufficiently upset to comment. There is an "in crowd" of devotees (I will be gracious and use that term) who have seriously degenerated over time to a pool of waspish, sniping, self opinionated followers of the "only true way" You seem to be joining them. Steve, Joe and a few others have been trying to point out to you that Sigma is not the only game in town nor is Foveon any further along than a "beta" verison. But all attempts to keep a balanced view have met with this kind of rebuff. Go back and check veroman's contributions to this forum, they are stellar and OBJECTIVE.

It is sad to see such luminaries as Laurence, spm and yourself attacking anyone who dares offer any criticism of the foveon dream. You were all so enthusiastic - now you are becoming blinkered whiners.

Let's face it the Polaroid experiment was an unmitigated disaster - a product recall is exactly that in commercial terms. How on earth do you imagine they are going to spin this history when and if they finally launch a product? And please no more about how wonderful those pictures are - the product was so bad the company had to withdraw it.
--
D70, 5700, 995
patrickh
 
... nor is Foveon any
further along than a "beta" verison. But all attempts to keep a
balanced view have met with this kind of rebuff.
Calling the X3 technology "beta" when they're in second generation and working well for many is not what I would consider a "balanced" view. I like to push back on such comments.
Go back and check
veroman's contributions to this forum, they are stellar and
OBJECTIVE.
I checked, and in some cases I've had to disagree, and said so. Is that so bad? When you agree with him, support him. It's called a discussion.
It is sad to see such luminaries as Laurence, spm and yourself
attacking anyone who dares offer any criticism of the foveon dream.
You were all so enthusiastic - now you are becoming blinkered
whiners.
That's not the way I see it. Defenders of the faith, maybe, but not whiners. But it's not so much attacking as defending from nonsense.
Let's face it the Polaroid experiment was an unmitigated disaster -
Whether it's unmitigated or not depends on what they do next.

j
 
Frankly after the recall debacle I do not see how Polaroid are going to convince any but the most die-hard foveon lover to even consider the camera let alone pay out good money for it.

The name "Polaroid" simply does not cut it any more - it's been overtaken by events.
--
D70, 5700, 995
patrickh
 
I'm not much into p contests - I too call it as I see it. The Sigma SD10 is a very fine instrument - far from perfect but very fine and produces stellar output. It is also three years old and the rest of the world (especially Nikon and Canon) have moved along. The "edge" the foveon had has been largely whittled away by recent developments. At the time of launch the SD10 could compete with the bayer 6MP latest and greatest out there. But now we have a bayer world where the 8MP is a lower end norm and the top ends are in the 12 + range. Maybe "beta" is harsh, but less competitive is not. How many threads have you seen here recently bemoaning the delay in the SD11 - is that because the SD10 has got worse? No, it's because everyone can see that the others are pulling ahead.

I really wish that what I have been seeing was "defending" - it has been characterised by a note of supercillious superiority that should never have crept in, and definitely sounds like whining to an outsider.

Disagreeing is one hing - but rank dismissal as happened in a recent LM response to veroman was not disagreeing. and even lovely lady spm appears to be jumping on board - I love those weeds.

If you wish to believe that WWL may have a magic wand to resurrect the 5 series in its present form and conquer the commercial world - well such is the power of faith which is the bridge between knowledge and belief. and especially if one takes the view that it is a great picture taker provided you accept RAW and process it on the computer at home with SPP. That's failure to recognize that purchasers of P+S want something they can drop off at Costco and get adequate prints - they are not looking for Rytterfalk size posters (I love his work). Bringing a new technology out for the mass market depends on a) price - and Polaroid is waaaaay off and b) simple pandering to current taste - the Canikon P+S produces such "lovelyyyy" colors. It could be done, but signs are not favorable, given the extensive delays and then the aborted launch. As someone else said "Didn't the management check the pictures before they allowed the machine out?"

All this breaks my heart - I was hoping down the road to be able to migrate my wonderful Nikkor lenses in front of the right sensor. Till then I shall continue to lurk and wait and see. BTW - where's Dasigmaguy?

--
D70, 5700, 995
patrickh
 
Check out the news story at:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0504/05041802wwl_x530recall.asp

Fits nicely with what we have actually seen, some rather poor pictures and some that were rather nice and showed promise that this may well be a useful camera when the "teething ring" is finally pried out of its lens-mount.

As I have been saying from the first with this new product by a company new to this level of camera, patience is a virtue. Again, for those who have not seen any of the more promising images take a look at:
http://www.pbase.com/polaroid_digital/first_images

Lets wait and see what happens!

Pete
 
I'm not much into p contests - I too call it as I see it. The Sigma
SD10 is a very fine instrument - far from perfect but very fine and
produces stellar output. It is also three years old and the rest of
the world ....
You hurt your "argument" when you can't even get basic facts straight. DPReview shows that that SD10 was announced in October of 2003. So its been a year and a half since its announcement. You must have been thinking of the first Foveon based SLR, the SD9 that was announced a little over three years ago. Maybe this is why you misused the term "beta".

Its a bit humorous to see someone complaining about lack of objectivity when their view is so obviously skewed.

--
Jay Turberville
http://www.jayandwanda.com
 
Point out to me where I have ever disagreed (or agreed) with Veroman's opinions ? As you may be well aware if you look at my post history I generally keep myself far away from technical discussions (because I really don't have much of a clue about other cameras). The Sigma SD9 is the only digital camera I have ever owned so I cannot contribute to all the comparison discussions other then to post some images now and then. Perhaps once in a while I may be accused of the odd poking and digging for fun (just lighthearted banter as far as I am concerned directed to people on this forum who take themself to serious). I was just amused by Veroman's assertion that Laurence would apologize to him if he knew about his "accomplishments and number of significant product introductions attached to" his name. This prompted my comment about everybody being equal etc .... What does it have to do with Sigma DSLR ? Absolutely nothing.

Cheers,

Marcel
 
Do you think anyone, in 2005, would (or should!) buy a camera
because it is the best preforming 1.5mp CMOS P&S -- that also
offers RAW output?
Whoa, where did that topic come from? Whom are you addressing with that?

As long as you got my attention, though, let me point out once again how silly it is to call the x530 a 1.5 MP camera. It has three times as much of everything relevant as a 1.5 MP camera has, except for bytes required in an uncompressed TIFF representation for native size image, where it has as few as a 1.5 MP camera, and that's a GOOD thing.

If you were addressing me, no, I never suggested that anyone would or should buy any particular camera, but that getting price and performance information first would be a logical step in a buying decision. Yes, even in 2005.

j
 
I'm not much into p contests - I too call it as I see it. The Sigma
SD10 is a very fine instrument - far from perfect but very fine and
produces stellar output. It is also three years old and the rest of
the world (especially Nikon and Canon) have moved along. The "edge"
the foveon had has been largely whittled away by recent
developments. At the time of launch the SD10 could compete with the
bayer 6MP latest and greatest out there. But now we have a bayer
world where the 8MP is a lower end norm and the top ends are in the
12 + range. Maybe "beta" is harsh, but less competitive is not. How
many threads have you seen here recently bemoaning the delay in the
SD11 - is that because the SD10 has got worse? No, it's because
everyone can see that the others are pulling ahead.

I really wish that what I have been seeing was "defending" - it has
been characterised by a note of supercillious superiority that
should never have crept in, and definitely sounds like whining to
an outsider.

Disagreeing is one hing - but rank dismissal as happened in a
recent LM response to veroman was not disagreeing. and even lovely
lady spm appears to be jumping on board - I love those weeds.
Tell me which board that I appeared to jumping on??? my answer was meant for the original poster, who is obviously starting this thread for no other reason than just want to stir up trouble here and put down users in this forum...if that is what you refer to than, I suggest that you start to think that may be this is why that most of us in this forum that often helpful and tolerate the barrages of this kind of threads from non-sigma users to create flame baits...where does it end???? and please stop using Veroman as a front of starting your rant...we can see through quite clearly!

I consider such a compliment that you people are finding the unworthy Polaroid x530 is such a threat that you have to keep going out of your way to bashing this camera...and I will not apologize for being blunt about it! and don't call me lovely, because I am not taking kindly to either false flattery and sarcasm.
If you wish to believe that WWL may have a magic wand to resurrect
the 5 series in its present form and conquer the commercial world -
well such is the power of faith which is the bridge between
knowledge and belief. and especially if one takes the view that it
is a great picture taker provided you accept RAW and process it on
the computer at home with SPP. That's failure to recognize that
purchasers of P+S want something they can drop off at Costco and
get adequate prints - they are not looking for Rytterfalk size
posters (I love his work). Bringing a new technology out for the
mass market depends on a) price - and Polaroid is waaaaay off and
b) simple pandering to current taste - the Canikon P+S produces
such "lovelyyyy" colors. It could be done, but signs are not
favorable, given the extensive delays and then the aborted launch.
As someone else said "Didn't the management check the pictures
before they allowed the machine out?"

All this breaks my heart - I was hoping down the road to be able to
migrate my wonderful Nikkor lenses in front of the right sensor.
Till then I shall continue to lurk and wait and see. BTW - where's
Dasigmaguy?
I hate to say this but isn't a bit neuratic? you have chosen a nice camera, why not go out and enjoy it.
--
D70, 5700, 995
patrickh
 
OK, I will grant that I am a bit testy - more testy - at times. For that, I apologize.

But you must also cut me enough slack and understand that repeating something that is really very much pointing toward FUD, if not already there, is also not good form. You opened that post by dredging up the oldest argument around:

"Why would anyone pay over $350 for a point and shoot that was only 1.5MP?"

the underlying reasoning of which has been hashed around here since February-March 2002. You got pushed back on that by JL and amended your basic premises in your next posting on that thread:

"I'm saying that 3.4MP of Foveon imagery is easily the equal of 6MP and even (in some cases) 8MP Bayer imagery. There's no need to call the SD10 a 10.2MP camera (which it isn't) or the Polaroid X530 a 4.5MP camera (which it isn't).

"But what I was REALLY saying was that the Polaroid is priced too high.

"It's not a near-$400 camera, in my view. There's just too much out there now at that price point that can better it in any number of ways."

Those are points one could discuss (again, in part; the price issue is at the core for you, and that is essential). So why bring up the initial posting? Why not restate your concern and your essential question and move the discussion forward? Just bringing up the same point invites another push back from JL and it is a tactic, which drove me nuts around here for ages, where some people just cannot seem to move beyond their narrow agenda. Cranking up an old squeeze box is of limited entertainment value, in my book.

And that is what hit my switch. I like discussions, and I like them when they move forward. When discussions start to do so, and someone keeps pulling it back to their little bully pulpit, certainly in some cases just to get attention (present company excepted), I get a little ragged in the old nerves department. For getting ragged, I apologize. For trying to keep your more important point - pricing - moving forward, I don't.

As Marcel said, we are all more or less equal in the ether. Normally, I would (and have) posted such a comment off forum, but your address is not available and a search of Google pulls up a few too many Steve Gareys for a useful mailing.

If this is true:

"But if you knew MY background, my history of accomplishments and the number of significant product introductions that are attached to my name, you'd apologize."

then, after apologizing for my misstep, I am even more astounded that you would not appreciate the current situation for the Polaroid x530. Yes, the road to release has been and still is rough. Yes, there have been more information misspeaks than one would want. Yes, in all likelihood some folks have fumbled the ball more than once. Yes, there are some pretty hideous images floating around.

But, it is also still not on the market. What you are talking about is still a pre-production tool. It is also an initial product, which is also often fraught with problems. And a lot of people are trying to show what it cannot do.

The last point is something that goes counter to everything I have done in my life. I believe in showing what things will do; what cannot be done is self-stated. I have always believed in pushing the limits. And in my own modest little life, that is how I have achieved anything.

I am not here as some Foveon flunky. But I do appreciate their guts to have a go at this market, and that respect provides the backdrop for a lot of my thinking. I perhaps cut them a little more slack than most, because I respect them for what **** Merrill once said in this forum:

"happily America is still populated by large numbers of people who
foolishly believe that if they invent a better mousetrap, they have

a chance at going up against the big guys and winning. especially if the big guys are focused on incremental improvements to traditional technologies."

From here:

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1000&message=6544921

Call me an idealist, if you want, but after all the cr@p around here about what a schitty place the US is for whatever reason, this comment reminds me of what is best about the place. I guess I get kind of pi$$ed off when someone tears up that bit too.

With all due respect.

--
Laurence

There is a tide in the affairs of men,
Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;
Omitted, all the voyage of their life
Is bound in shallows and in miseries.

http://www.pbase.com/lmatson/root
http://www.pbase.com/sigmasd9/root
http://www.pbase.com/cameras/sigma/sd10
http://www.pbase.com/cameras/sigma/sd9
http://www.beachbriss.com (eternal test site)
 
I think almost all "Prosumer" compacts have RAW ability, but these are almost exclusively CCD.

I was interested in purchasing a Nikon CP8400 and shooting RAW until I saw the 8 second shot to shot times. Shockingly slow and rarely practical. I'm not sure if other compact cameras (such as the X530) handle the large files more quickly. My impression is that compact and RAW don't mix well due to the lack of processing horsepower.

Just my thoughts anyway...

Regards,
Damien
Hi Ron, Thanks very much, I looked up that camera's specs, 7.1MP,
CCD, ~$488, any others, any CMOS-imagers? Essentially by
point-and-shoot, I'm thinking of non-DSLR -- any others, especially
CMOS?
Thanks in advance, Sandy
[email protected]
http://www.pbase.com/sandyfleischman
 
--
====================================
' Men substitute words for reality and then fight over words'
 
--
====================================
' Men substitute words for reality and then fight over words'
 
...why the "foveon-fetish"???

How old are you?

Now you find yourself defending a camera that you neither own -- and is being "recalled" -- by people who know far more about it than you can ever hope to...

...what's your motivation?

Where does your anger come from???

--
====================================
' Men substitute words for reality and then fight over words'
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top