An award for the Dimage7. What kind of crack are they on?

steel_yo

Forum Enthusiast
Messages
292
Reaction score
0
Location
Magnolia, TX, US
An award for the Dimage7. What kind of crack are they on?
It's like giving a Ford Pinto a Car a of the year award...

Its the most anticipated but disappointing Digi to date...
 
And that for the price off..... whahahahaa

It can't be the best and the worst at the same time.

There are a very few people who get this digicam, but everybody knows what a beautiful cam it is, and who read the last review knows how terrible it is in about 3 weeks.

??? What a (p)review can do ???

Power to the reviewers...
An award for the Dimage7. What kind of crack are they on?
It's like giving a Ford Pinto a Car a of the year award...

Its the most anticipated but disappointing Digi to date...
 
An award for the Dimage7. What kind of crack are they on?
It's like giving a Ford Pinto a Car a of the year award...

Its the most anticipated but disappointing Digi to date...
Unfortunately, it appears someone got their information screwed up. The award appears to be for the Minolta Dynax 7 --- not the DiMAGE 7.
 
Really?

Sure about that?
An award for the Dimage7. What kind of crack are they on?
It's like giving a Ford Pinto a Car a of the year award...

Its the most anticipated but disappointing Digi to date...
Unfortunately, it appears someone got their information screwed up.
The award appears to be for the Minolta Dynax 7 --- not the
DiMAGE 7.
 
I just followed the clicks on the lead-in article at the top of your site to get more information and the article says "Minolta Dynax 7" and includes a picture of a Minolta SLR camera. Beyond that, I do not know.

Jim B.
Sure about that?
An award for the Dimage7. What kind of crack are they on?
It's like giving a Ford Pinto a Car a of the year award...

Its the most anticipated but disappointing Digi to date...
Unfortunately, it appears someone got their information screwed up.
The award appears to be for the Minolta Dynax 7 --- not the
DiMAGE 7.
 
An award for the Dimage7. What kind of crack are they on?
It's like giving a Ford Pinto a Car a of the year award...

Its the most anticipated but disappointing Digi to date...
I do not know if the award is based purely on camera specification or on actual experience of camera use. I suspect that it is largely the former since production DiMAGE 7s have only just appeared for people to actually use. In which case, in my opinion, the award is entirely justified -- in terms of its specification the D7 is almost the perfect digital camera. In this respect it beats hollow any other digital camera in its price range:
  • Highest resolution.
  • Most capable lens (very high quality optics with remarkably little distortion and CA) with one of the widest zoom ranges; excellent wide-angle, very good telephoto and good macro capabilities.
  • Lots of focusing and exposure options, with an excellent aperture range and shutter speed range.
  • Lots of in-camera control - colour saturation, sharpening, contrast, etc.
  • Good ergonomics - lots of external controls without resorting to multi-level menus.
  • Control of zoom and manual focussing via lens rings -- more responsive and intuitive than stupid fiddly little buttons.
  • Best EVF in any digital camera (better colours, faster, higher resolution than any other, also tiltable).
  • Lots of other design pluses, such as proper lens thread, metal tripod mount, CompactFlash/MicroDrive, etc etc.
On paper the D7 is an absolute winner and whoever put together its specification deserves an award. Unfortunately Minolta seem to have screwed up on the actual implementation of the specification -- poor (or, to be more generous, whacky) aesthetics, not the best build quality, high power consumption and (presumably related) heat generation, and auto-focus problems.

I am not familiar with the Ford Pinto (I guess here in the UK it goes under a different name), but I would imagine that the difference between the Ford Pinto and the D7 is that the former is crap both in terms of its specification and its actual usage, whereas the D7 has an unbeatable specification (in its price range) but in actual usage ... well, it appears to have some significant shortcomings.

Terry.

(Buying intentions in the next ten days: Minolta DiMAGE 7 - 35% chance; Olympus E-10 - 35% chance; Canon EOS D30 - 15% chance; no purchase & stick with my current Oly C2100 for longer - 15% chance!!!!)
 
what are the chances of buying ford pinto if available?
An award for the Dimage7. What kind of crack are they on?
It's like giving a Ford Pinto a Car a of the year award...

Its the most anticipated but disappointing Digi to date...
I do not know if the award is based purely on camera specification
or on actual experience of camera use. I suspect that it is
largely the former since production DiMAGE 7s have only just
appeared for people to actually use. In which case, in my opinion,
the award is entirely justified -- in terms of its specification
the D7 is almost the perfect digital camera. In this respect it
beats hollow any other digital camera in its price range:
  • Highest resolution.
  • Most capable lens (very high quality optics with remarkably
little distortion and CA) with one of the widest zoom ranges;
excellent wide-angle, very good telephoto and good macro
capabilities.
  • Lots of focusing and exposure options, with an excellent aperture
range and shutter speed range.
  • Lots of in-camera control - colour saturation, sharpening,
contrast, etc.
  • Good ergonomics - lots of external controls without resorting to
multi-level menus.
  • Control of zoom and manual focussing via lens rings -- more
responsive and intuitive than stupid fiddly little buttons.
  • Best EVF in any digital camera (better colours, faster, higher
resolution than any other, also tiltable).
  • Lots of other design pluses, such as proper lens thread, metal
tripod mount, CompactFlash/MicroDrive, etc etc.

On paper the D7 is an absolute winner and whoever put together its
specification deserves an award. Unfortunately Minolta seem to
have screwed up on the actual implementation of the specification
-- poor (or, to be more generous, whacky) aesthetics, not the best
build quality, high power consumption and (presumably related) heat
generation, and auto-focus problems.

I am not familiar with the Ford Pinto (I guess here in the UK it
goes under a different name), but I would imagine that the
difference between the Ford Pinto and the D7 is that the former is
crap both in terms of its specification and its actual usage,
whereas the D7 has an unbeatable specification (in its price range)
but in actual usage ... well, it appears to have some significant
shortcomings.

Terry.

(Buying intentions in the next ten days: Minolta DiMAGE 7 - 35%
chance; Olympus E-10 - 35% chance; Canon EOS D30 - 15% chance; no
purchase & stick with my current Oly C2100 for longer - 15%
chance!!!!)
 
I am sure you could find one on ebay!
An award for the Dimage7. What kind of crack are they on?
It's like giving a Ford Pinto a Car a of the year award...

Its the most anticipated but disappointing Digi to date...
I do not know if the award is based purely on camera specification
or on actual experience of camera use. I suspect that it is
largely the former since production DiMAGE 7s have only just
appeared for people to actually use. In which case, in my opinion,
the award is entirely justified -- in terms of its specification
the D7 is almost the perfect digital camera. In this respect it
beats hollow any other digital camera in its price range:
  • Highest resolution.
  • Most capable lens (very high quality optics with remarkably
little distortion and CA) with one of the widest zoom ranges;
excellent wide-angle, very good telephoto and good macro
capabilities.
  • Lots of focusing and exposure options, with an excellent aperture
range and shutter speed range.
  • Lots of in-camera control - colour saturation, sharpening,
contrast, etc.
  • Good ergonomics - lots of external controls without resorting to
multi-level menus.
  • Control of zoom and manual focussing via lens rings -- more
responsive and intuitive than stupid fiddly little buttons.
  • Best EVF in any digital camera (better colours, faster, higher
resolution than any other, also tiltable).
  • Lots of other design pluses, such as proper lens thread, metal
tripod mount, CompactFlash/MicroDrive, etc etc.

On paper the D7 is an absolute winner and whoever put together its
specification deserves an award. Unfortunately Minolta seem to
have screwed up on the actual implementation of the specification
-- poor (or, to be more generous, whacky) aesthetics, not the best
build quality, high power consumption and (presumably related) heat
generation, and auto-focus problems.

I am not familiar with the Ford Pinto (I guess here in the UK it
goes under a different name), but I would imagine that the
difference between the Ford Pinto and the D7 is that the former is
crap both in terms of its specification and its actual usage,
whereas the D7 has an unbeatable specification (in its price range)
but in actual usage ... well, it appears to have some significant
shortcomings.

Terry.

(Buying intentions in the next ten days: Minolta DiMAGE 7 - 35%
chance; Olympus E-10 - 35% chance; Canon EOS D30 - 15% chance; no
purchase & stick with my current Oly C2100 for longer - 15%
chance!!!!)
 
A Minolta 7 in drag?? I have no doubt this camera will get 'Camera of the Year' award in the UK's AMATEUR PHOTOGRAPHER magazine. Its costs are offset by ads and Pull-Outs from Minolta, Canon and Nikon, but I doubt its readers would spot the obvious! I bought a two issues recently (!!!!) as there is something I want to buy. One had an insert about digital photography and it was simply a hand-out by Canon, while todays copy contains a 'Guide to Great (digital) Pictures' but really its junk mail from Hewlett Packard. Yep, it'll be No1 digicam for sure. I dont think AP has heard of Sony...
LarryG
 
An award for the Dimage7. What kind of crack are they on?
It's like giving a Ford Pinto a Car a of the year award...

Its the most anticipated but disappointing Digi to date...
Most disappointing? Please get real.

Ok, it has a few cons, but it is still a one of the kind camera. And the cons are not that big. Read Phils newsletter where he says he "quite like the camera". And Steves review on a production model camera...

Then its up to you if you could live with the cons.

And regarding the award. If they didnt give it to the D7, where would they have put it? Theres no other to give it to.... There has been NO exciting news in this pricesegment in quite some time, only upgraded old models....

Jonas
 
People expect the D7 too much so they are disappointing. They can't afford D1X, D30 but hope the D7 could be their poor man's D1X but actually not the case. The same happen for people to compare E-10 to D30 and D1X. If the D7 price is set right, it may be a very good DC for non-pro serious user.

Francis.
An award for the Dimage7. What kind of crack are they on?
It's like giving a Ford Pinto a Car a of the year award...

Its the most anticipated but disappointing Digi to date...
Most disappointing? Please get real.
Ok, it has a few cons, but it is still a one of the kind camera.
And the cons are not that big. Read Phils newsletter where he says
he "quite like the camera". And Steves review on a production model
camera...

Then its up to you if you could live with the cons.

And regarding the award. If they didnt give it to the D7, where
would they have put it? Theres no other to give it to.... There has
been NO exciting news in this pricesegment in quite some time, only
upgraded old models....

Jonas
 
People expect the D7 too much so they are disappointing. They can't
afford D1X, D30 but hope the D7 could be their poor man's D1X but
actually not the case. The same happen for people to compare E-10
to D30 and D1X. If the D7 price is set right, it may be a very good
DC for non-pro serious user.

Francis.
Francis, do you seriously think people call Skodas because they cannot afford a Rolls? I dont thin anyone seriously compared a small chip D7 with a large chip D1X. The likes of D1X etc are silly prices because we are in at the beginning of the digicam revolution... one day digicams will be norrmal fare and prices will be far more in line with what people are PREPARED to pay. The D7 proposition had lots of potential. Sadly Minolta fell at a few hurdles, but with their experience one wonders why. Why for instance do they fit a stiff zoom with a cheap plasticky feel, why a small grip, why is it hungry for batteries, why cheap build quality, why does it get hotter than usual and why the 'color space' necessity? Should the camera have come in at £1200 and short-cuts were taken to get price down to £1000...? who knows. I for one will give it a go when the D7's arrive locally. But the picture-quality better be £300~worth better than the current crop of £700 digicams.
Cheers, LarryG
An award for the Dimage7. What kind of crack are they on?
It's like giving a Ford Pinto a Car a of the year award...

Its the most anticipated but disappointing Digi to date...
Most disappointing? Please get real.
Ok, it has a few cons, but it is still a one of the kind camera.
And the cons are not that big. Read Phils newsletter where he says
he "quite like the camera". And Steves review on a production model
camera...

Then its up to you if you could live with the cons.

And regarding the award. If they didnt give it to the D7, where
would they have put it? Theres no other to give it to.... There has
been NO exciting news in this pricesegment in quite some time, only
upgraded old models....

Jonas
 
Sadly Minolta fell at a few
hurdles, but with their experience one wonders why. Why for
instance do they fit a stiff zoom with a cheap plasticky feel, why
a small grip, why is it hungry for batteries, why cheap build
quality, why does it get hotter than usual and why the 'color
space' necessity?
Cheap plastic feel... Thats the feeling I get with all Minoltas cameras. They are still great cameras!

The colour space I see as a good thing. Anything better than sRGB is good!

Heat and battery might be a problem for some, thats true....

However, the cons are not as big as most people try to make of it.
I hope :-)

Jonas
 
I have an E-10 and I am extremly satisfied with it. Although, I would not bother to compare it to a D1x. Its much better than the D7 for sure...
Francis.
An award for the Dimage7. What kind of crack are they on?
It's like giving a Ford Pinto a Car a of the year award...

Its the most anticipated but disappointing Digi to date...
Most disappointing? Please get real.
Ok, it has a few cons, but it is still a one of the kind camera.
And the cons are not that big. Read Phils newsletter where he says
he "quite like the camera". And Steves review on a production model
camera...

Then its up to you if you could live with the cons.

And regarding the award. If they didnt give it to the D7, where
would they have put it? Theres no other to give it to.... There has
been NO exciting news in this pricesegment in quite some time, only
upgraded old models....

Jonas
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top