Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is a very valid point. We're currently working hard onbecause it gave them way too many options (like
color correction--why would I want my customers to color correct my
shots?).
simplifying it to two options:
For professional photographs, choose true color.
For consumer photographse, choose autoadjust.
Can't promise exactly the form it will take after it goes through
user testing, but it will be far simpler.
Another very valid point. The 100 MB upload limits have frustratedFotki is unique in having FTP uploading, which makes automating
uploads very easy; smugmug has a very small limit on the batch
upload size, which makes uploading 100 MB of photos WAY difficult.
a lot of our customers in the past.
The Mac uploader is unlimited and publishing an API has created
lots to choice. Two of the most popular are:
http://wiki.shahine.com/default.aspx/MyWiki.SendToSmugMug
http://www.smugmugexplorer.com
They have consumer-friendly interfaces (on SendtoSmugmug, you just
right-click a folder and away you go, no need for an ftp client).
And they allow things like gallery creation & configuration.
I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Chris MacAskill
smugmug
--
--Which one would you go for if you have to and why?
--program. it's very good.give it a try. nik, a fellow dpreview forum member, wrote the
----program. it's very good.give it a try. nik, a fellow dpreview forum member, wrote the
1dmkII, 20d, 16-35, 24-70, 70-200 2.8 L IS, 100-400, 24 1.4, 85
1.8, 135 f2, 1.4x II, 580EX, 420EX, STE-2, Canon G6, Tokina 24-200
and a bunch of other stuff.
The thing is the only formats browsers can display is jpeg or gif, and the only formats the web-connected printers can use (without converting) is jpeg.Any plan to support RAW format?
--Which one would you go for if you have to and why?
Thanks for the vote of confidence, and I hate to correct you, but it's more like every week for new features.Never found it down or offline. Plus they actively add new
features to the site every couple of months.
--Which one would you go for if you have to and why?
Luis Curran
http://www.pbase.com/lcurran
The virtue of the camera is not the power it has to transform the
photographer into an artist, but the impulse in him to keep looking.
Brooks Atkinson, 'Once Around the Sun'
The thing is the only formats browsers can display is jpeg or gif,Any plan to support RAW format?
and the only formats the web-connected printers can use (without
converting) is jpeg.
So.... we do our best to convert other formats such as tiff and bmp
to jpeg when we receive them. We aren't always successful and
have to generate error messages now and then because there is so
much variation in the way you can create them.
The honest answer is we don't currently support RAW and have no
near-term plans to do so. It would be quite an undertaking to
manage the conversion of so many different file types. We think
programs that run on your desktop can do the conversion much better
because you can interact with them, etc.
Sorry I don't have a better answer for you.
Thanks,
Chris
--Someone following the thread, sees "New" and wastes their time
discovering it was nothing.
Against Forum rules: "Bumping - Deliberately 'bumping' your message
back to the top of the forum with no new content."
Your history shows you don't habitually do this, so my guess is you
want to have it show up in your "My Theads". There has to be a
better way, even if it is to take the time to post a useful remark.
Maybe I'll learn something.
No hard feelings
C
--Which one would you go for if you have to and why?
Luis Curran
http://www.pbase.com/lcurran
The virtue of the camera is not the power it has to transform the
photographer into an artist, but the impulse in him to keep looking.
Brooks Atkinson, 'Once Around the Sun'
--Someone following the thread, sees "New" and wastes their time
discovering it was nothing.
Against Forum rules: "Bumping - Deliberately 'bumping' your message
back to the top of the forum with no new content."
Your history shows you don't habitually do this, so my guess is you
want to have it show up in your "My Theads". There has to be a
better way, even if it is to take the time to post a useful remark.
Maybe I'll learn something.
No hard feelings
C
--Which one would you go for if you have to and why?
Luis Curran
http://www.pbase.com/lcurran
The virtue of the camera is not the power it has to transform the
photographer into an artist, but the impulse in him to keep looking.
Brooks Atkinson, 'Once Around the Sun'
(See profile for equipment I own -- questions welcome.)
One of the reasons I like going to my own site so often (even when I have no other reason to) is just to see what new feature has been added THIS week!Thanks for the vote of confidence, and I hate to correct you, but
it's more like every week for new features.![]()
------Which one would you go for if you have to and why?
Mike Flaherty
http://imageevent.com/mflaherty/mikesgallery
Clicker
'Democracy is the recurrent suspicion that more than half of the
people are right more than half of the time.'
-- E.B. White
http://www.pbase.com/radamo/faves
Who knows how to reach Phil?
I'd use a "Watch" feature quite a bt.
Thanks for the clear exposition of the problem.
I'd also like a way of saving an entire thread to disk, preferably
as a text file that could be editied, including embedded pics. One
can do it now, but it is message-by message tediousness. (I know
the pics aren't really embedded). I suppose if folks post pics,
they know they may be downloaded for personal reference.
Any other use would be unethical.
Think we are going off-topic here - need to start over in Open Talk.
C
--Which one would you go for if you have to and why?
Well, some people, like myself, care more for the quality of the hosting interface and the ability for linking directly. I think PBase is excellent in these respects. As far as service is concerned, I had one day of access problems, and PBase gave me a month of free hosting. I think it is better than fair...To me it is about Customer SERVICE...and PBase does not have
that at all! Some people who are using PBase are diehards and will
not leave PBase ever even if the service tanks. There are far too
many complaints about PBase that really keeps me from signing up. I
will never get how people allow themselves to put up with VERY POOR
service or lack of communication from a company. PBase has a
terrible record as far as communication and for that reason alone I
advise everyone to Run!
Does that sound like a reasonable, educated opinion? ANY of them, really? People really made a mountain out of a molehill from the period when PBase has switched servers.Any other web site is far better.