Of course Nikon will say it's an improvement, the VR lens replaced the 80-200 afs. It wouldn't be smart for them to say it wasn't as good optically. I owned one of those lenses and I was very disappointed with the quality versus the 80-200mm. With 21 elements and the vr lens group, much could go wrong.
80-200:
http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/lens/af/zoom/telephoto/ai_af_ed_80-200mmf28d.htm
70-200:
http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/lens/af/zoom/telephoto/af-s_vr_ed_70-200mmf28g_if.htm
As for ergonomics and beauty pageant looks, that's in the eye of
the beholder.
Todd
Return the VR and get a used 80-200mm afs f2.8. Could easily be
found for under $800 in pristine condition. Plus this lens is
arguably sharper, looks nicer and is more ergo friendly. The VR is