deecy//
Leading Member
--The iMac has been out for a while now. Do any owners have any complaints about the design, or regrets about choosing this configuration?
Best,
Tom
deecy//
Best,
Tom
deecy//
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
--Couple of questions-Not really. It works pretty well, and is a clean, simple solution
for a serious work machine with a pretty big display in an area in
which space is at a premium.
I do sometimes wish I had a dual-processor PowerMac for some of my
photo operations, but that's another story.
At the Apple store near you go play with a dually and render a 10mb image. Then go to the iMac and do the same. You can get a whole blink in before it is done on the iMac compared to the 3/4 on the dual processor. Unless you are doing heavy graphic design daily and your are willing to spend the extra money (you wouldn't want anything less than a 30" monitor in that case) this is not an issue to be worried about. It's fast, period.--Couple of questions-
What about your photo operations exactly?
Yes, more than enough.Is the iMac sufficient
for storing, editing, etc.?
Runs Photoshop CS perfectly.Does it run PS okay?
There are only so many ports and if you do it correctly you'll never see the wires. It looks cool. You might also consider getting an AirPort base station and installing a card. You can eliminate the wires for your network, printer, and modem doing that. Floppies? What's that? Time to put everything on CD or DVD-R or even on the Apple server because you'll want to get .Mac too.And, since nobody brings up the obvious, I will - when the iMac is
hooked up with support devices (hard drives, floppy disk drives,
printers, scanners, etc, etc.), are there a lot of wires plugged
into it at the rear of the machine? In which case, is it still as
cool as it looks in the stores?
Your welcome.Thanks,
Oh, don't get me wrong, it's plenty powerful enough. Not exactly blink-and-you'll-miss-it for heavy processing of large RAW files, but it runs PS fine, and works beautifully at 1680x1050. I've got a gig of RAM and wish I'd gone for two, but not at the prices Apple charges. Perhaps I'll get an upgrade from Micron at some point.--Couple of questions-Not really. It works pretty well, and is a clean, simple solution
for a serious work machine with a pretty big display in an area in
which space is at a premium.
I do sometimes wish I had a dual-processor PowerMac for some of my
photo operations, but that's another story.
What about your photo operations exactly? Is the iMac sufficient
for storing, editing, etc.? Does it run PS okay?
And, since nobody brings up the obvious, I will - when the iMac is
hooked up with support devices (hard drives, floppy disk drives,
printers, scanners, etc, etc.), are there a lot of wires plugged
into it at the rear of the machine? In which case, is it still as
cool as it looks in the stores?
--The iMac has been out for a while now. Do any owners have any
complaints about the design, or regrets about choosing this
configuration?
Best,
Tom
deecy//
if you are doing alot of photo work (especially when using third party stuff like neatimage) you will definitely be twiddling your thumbs longer with the imac. yes the imac is a good machine, and can do PSCS etc very well. yet if photo (or video) work is a major function, think carefully.it's all about priorities, which only you can answer; cost, speed, compact form, tolerance for waiting, etc.Unless you are doing heavy graphic design daily and
your are willing to spend the extra money (you wouldn't want
anything less than a 30" monitor in that case) this is not an issue
to be worried about. It's fast, period.
----The iMac has been out for a while now. Do any owners have any
complaints about the design, or regrets about choosing this
configuration?
Best,
Tom
deecy//
Scratching his head. That's what I said.if you are doing alot of photo work (especially when using third
party stuff like neatimage) you will definitely be twiddling your
thumbs longer with the imac. yes the imac is a good machine, and
can do PSCS etc very well. yet if photo (or video) work is a major
function, think carefully.it's all about priorities, which only you
can answer; cost, speed, compact form, tolerance for waiting, etc.
it sounded to me as if you thought the speed difference is minor. anyone doing lots of photos (most of us here?) will appreciate the significant speed increase on the dual. sorry if i misunderstood your point.You can get a whole blink in before it is done on the iMac compared to the 3/4 on the dual
processor
--The iMac has been out for a while now. Do any owners have any
complaints about the design, or regrets about choosing this
configuration?
Best,
Tom
deecy//
Just about everyone ups the RAM which is understandable. 256K for a
computer that's going to be used as an iMac will is a joke.
But anyway I'm on the verge of ordering an iMac 20" to replace my
aging Powermac. I don't plan on buying any RAM from Apple. What I
planned to do is order with the included 256K and buy a 512K stick
from a third party vendor. This way I'll have 3/4 of a Gig for
around the same as Apple wants for just the 512 upgrade.
But is that a good idea? I've heard pro/con on using non matched
sets. I'm just wondering if anyone has done it and could give me
some "real world" experience.
Also I plan on getting Bluetooth as well (even though I don't even
have anything BT). I can't count it out in the future. It seems as
though you can get the works (keyboard, mouse, and installed
internal BT device) for around a 100 bucks. Good deal. I won't even
use the mouse (too much in love with my Logitech MX1000) but the
keyboard is nice. I'm just curious if I go for this option does it
still include the USB keyboard/mouse? I'll be selling the Powermac
on ebay so I won't have any wired keyboard and it makes me somewhat
nervous not having one in case I need to troubleshoot something.
Thanks for any insight.
Just about everyone ups the RAM which is understandable. 256K for a
computer that's going to be used as an iMac will is a joke.
But anyway I'm on the verge of ordering an iMac 20" to replace my
aging Powermac. I don't plan on buying any RAM from Apple. What I
planned to do is order with the included 256K and buy a 512K stick
from a third party vendor. This way I'll have 3/4 of a Gig for
around the same as Apple wants for just the 512 upgrade.
But is that a good idea? I've heard pro/con on using non matched
sets. I'm just wondering if anyone has done it and could give me
some "real world" experience.
Also I plan on getting Bluetooth as well (even though I don't even
have anything BT). I can't count it out in the future. It seems as
though you can get the works (keyboard, mouse, and installed
internal BT device) for around a 100 bucks. Good deal. I won't even
use the mouse (too much in love with my Logitech MX1000) but the
keyboard is nice. I'm just curious if I go for this option does it
still include the USB keyboard/mouse? I'll be selling the Powermac
on ebay so I won't have any wired keyboard and it makes me somewhat
nervous not having one in case I need to troubleshoot something.
Thanks for any insight.