Reading mode: Light Dark

Fuji Hyper-S v2 software ...

  • Thread starter Thread starter EJN
  • Start date Start date
Go to last post
E

EJN

Guest
I just wonder if anybody has actually used this software out of the S20Pro box and if they think more of it than I do ?

Frankly I think the whole thing is a complete waste of time and space. It is extremely poor to say the least and so far as my own thoughts are concerned, be they agrreable or otherwise with thougts of others, Fuji may as well have saved space in the box !

Personally I find the prof S7RAW does a better job ...AND is stated specifically usable with quite a number of other Fuji cameras , not just the S20 and S2Pro that Hyper.. states in that product.

Good Heavens...what a let-down...and MORE I'd think, if you actually PAID the £130 that Fuji tell you it costs to buy ....bunkum !

Just a personal thought being expressed, but come on Fuji ...this is not up to your standard.

--
ericN

 
EJN said:
Frankly I think the whole thing is a complete waste of time and
space. It is extremely poor to say the least and so far as my own
thoughts are concerned, be they agrreable or otherwise with thougts
of others, Fuji may as well have saved space in the box !
Click to expand...
Member said:
Good Heavens...what a let-down...and MORE I'd think, if you
actually PAID the £130 that Fuji tell you it costs to buy
....bunkum !
Click to expand...
My thoughts exactly !

Regards

Ramon
 
I agree that the Fuji software has a horrible UI and is intolerably slow, but unfortunately, I've found in the end it produces much better results than the alternative available to me, which is Adobe's Camera Raw. When I open the S20Pro images in Camera Raw, the noise is horrible. But, when opened in Hyper-S v2, they're crystal clear. I'm just guessing that Adobe has not correctly implemented the conversion of the separate S and R pixels. Or, perhaps I need to upgrade to 2.4.

Anyway, I"m wondering if you've compared the image quality between Hyper-S v2 and S7RAW and noticed any significant differences.

Also, I'm wondering if anyone out there has noticed the same problem I have with Camera Raw and S20Pro conversion.

Thanks,
Ben
EJN said:
I just wonder if anybody has actually used this software out of the
S20Pro box and if they think more of it than I do ?
Frankly I think the whole thing is a complete waste of time and
space. It is extremely poor to say the least and so far as my own
thoughts are concerned, be they agrreable or otherwise with thougts
of others, Fuji may as well have saved space in the box !
Personally I find the prof S7RAW does a better job ...AND is stated
specifically usable with quite a number of other Fuji cameras , not
just the S20 and S2Pro that Hyper.. states in that product.
Good Heavens...what a let-down...and MORE I'd think, if you
actually PAID the £130 that Fuji tell you it costs to buy
....bunkum !
Just a personal thought being expressed, but come on Fuji ...this
is not up to your standard.

--
ericN

Click to expand...
 
OK, never mind. I see this issue has been addressed elsewhere and I'm not the only one with noise problems in Camera Raw. Still hoping the upgrade to 2.4 might help. If not, it looks like S7RAW is the way to go.
BenA said:
Anyway, I"m wondering if you've compared the image quality between
Hyper-S v2 and S7RAW and noticed any significant differences.

Also, I'm wondering if anyone out there has noticed the same
problem I have with Camera Raw and S20Pro conversion.

Thanks,
Ben
EJN said:
I just wonder if anybody has actually used this software out of the
S20Pro box and if they think more of it than I do ?
Frankly I think the whole thing is a complete waste of time and
space. It is extremely poor to say the least and so far as my own
thoughts are concerned, be they agrreable or otherwise with thougts
of others, Fuji may as well have saved space in the box !
Personally I find the prof S7RAW does a better job ...AND is stated
specifically usable with quite a number of other Fuji cameras , not
just the S20 and S2Pro that Hyper.. states in that product.
Good Heavens...what a let-down...and MORE I'd think, if you
actually PAID the £130 that Fuji tell you it costs to buy
....bunkum !
Just a personal thought being expressed, but come on Fuji ...this
is not up to your standard.

--
ericN

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top