From 70-200/4 to 80-200/2.8 upgrade or downgrade?

Rachmaninov

Member
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Location
US
Please give your opinions. I currently have 70-200/f4 and like it. But sometimes I wish it's faster. So would you think about 80-200/2.8 in like new condition? Or should I think of 70-200/2.8 non IS (I just heard that 80-200/2.8 is one of the best lenses Canon ever made).

Please owners of 80-200 give me your thoughts and probably samples

Thanks!
 
I've got the 80-200, and if I saw one in like new condition I'd buy a second with no hesitation. It's by far the best lens I've used. I can't recommend it highly enough.

I'll poke about my gallery and see what I can offer for samples...

Good luck,

Barnsie
Please give your opinions. I currently have 70-200/f4 and like it.
But sometimes I wish it's faster. So would you think about
80-200/2.8 in like new condition? Or should I think of 70-200/2.8
non IS (I just heard that 80-200/2.8 is one of the best lenses
Canon ever made).

Please owners of 80-200 give me your thoughts and probably samples

Thanks!
 
the F2.8 is faster, better bokeh and shaper.
Please give your opinions. I currently have 70-200/f4 and like it.
But sometimes I wish it's faster. So would you think about
80-200/2.8 in like new condition? Or should I think of 70-200/2.8
non IS (I just heard that 80-200/2.8 is one of the best lenses
Canon ever made).

Please owners of 80-200 give me your thoughts and probably samples

Thanks!
--



Please do not start new thread for private message to me but send them to me via email instead! thanks.
 
-
Please give your opinions. I currently have 70-200/f4 and like it.
But sometimes I wish it's faster. So would you think about
80-200/2.8 in like new condition? Or should I think of 70-200/2.8
non IS (I just heard that 80-200/2.8 is one of the best lenses
Canon ever made).

Please owners of 80-200 give me your thoughts and probably samples

Thanks!
--



Please do not start new thread for private message to me but send
them to me via email instead! thanks.
 
The only drawbacks that I see to the 80-200L:

-can't use canon 1.4x or 2x converters (didn't matter to me)

-not usm (AF turned out to be very fast anyway, not an issue)

-uncertainty about how long Canon will be able to service it (Since I bought mine I heard of several individuals having the swith repaired and front elements replaced by Canon-NJ, so I'm not too worried.)

I've used the newer 70-200L (close but $) and the f/4 (no contest) but I greatly prefer the 80-200L.

Here's a few shots. All sized and sharpened, but you get the idea...







Good Luck.

Barnsie
 
The only drawbacks that I see to the 80-200L:

-can't use canon 1.4x or 2x converters (didn't matter to me)

-not usm (AF turned out to be very fast anyway, not an issue)

-uncertainty about how long Canon will be able to service it (Since
I bought mine I heard of several individuals having the swith
repaired and front elements replaced by Canon-NJ, so I'm not too
worried.)

I've used the newer 70-200L (close but $) and the f/4 (no contest)
but I greatly prefer the 80-200L.

Here's a few shots. All sized and sharpened, but you get the idea...







Good Luck.

Barnsie
 
Huge upgrade. The 70-200/f4 is a dog in comparison.
Please give your opinions. I currently have 70-200/f4 and like it.
But sometimes I wish it's faster. So would you think about
80-200/2.8 in like new condition? Or should I think of 70-200/2.8
non IS (I just heard that 80-200/2.8 is one of the best lenses
Canon ever made).

Please owners of 80-200 give me your thoughts and probably samples

Thanks!
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top