Reading mode: Light Dark

Noise Ninja is DA BOMB!

Go to last post
I've used both, and Noise Ninja is superior because NeatImage is SLOW. Noise Ninja does the same job in a fraction of the time.
 
The problem with this test is that products change, and it is difficult to keep up. Yes, NoiseNinja 1.0 gave better results than NeatImage 2.5 - that's what the tests indicate.

However, the current version of NeatImage, 4.4, is also dramatically better than the version tested. I bet the current version of NoiseNinja, 2.1, is also quite a bit better than the version tested.

These applications tend to leapfrog each other. Typically, the one with the latest release date is the best. Also, it is worthwhile to learn the idiosyncracies of the tool you have, whichever it is. Often, you can obtain superior results with a slightly inferior tool that you know, than with a fantastic tool that you've never used before. To an extent, these idiosyncracies, in part an expression of the developers ideas and perspective, transcend multiple releases.

At least, I keep telling myself that, so I won't feel quite so much of a need to rush out and get the latest and greatest tool on the net to replace the one I currently have. ;-)
 
How about Noiseware by Imagenomic?
http://www.imagenomic.com/see.asp

I've seen good things posted about it elseware. Comes in standalone and plug-in versions, including a free "community" version.
The advanced versions have an interesting sounding feature:

"Intelligent. Noiseware continuously perfects its processing quality. Every time you filter an image, Noiseware learns more about your own camera or image acquisition device."

I'm downloading to try.
thw said:
IMHO, just slightly better than Neat Image. :b
Click to expand...
--
Steven Maniscalco
http://www.pbase.com/dazedgonebye
 
I installed the free version yesterday for the first time. I was impressed with the results. I'll play with it for a week or so so that I can grow more familiar with it. While I'm at it, I might as well examine NeatImage as well. Eventually I will buy one or the other....

In my short time with Noise Ninja, I'm very impressed.

Best, Keefe.
sleze said:
best $80 I have ever spent

--
http://www.thereheis.com
Click to expand...
--
Keefe
 
Its fantastic and very very fast.
2boys said:
I've seen good things posted about it elseware. Comes in
standalone and plug-in versions, including a free "community"
version.
The advanced versions have an interesting sounding feature:

"Intelligent. Noiseware continuously perfects its processing
quality. Every time you filter an image, Noiseware learns more
about your own camera or image acquisition device."

I'm downloading to try.
thw said:
IMHO, just slightly better than Neat Image. :b
Click to expand...
--
Steven Maniscalco
http://www.pbase.com/dazedgonebye
Click to expand...
--
Rudi
My Latest Pharts: http://www.pbase.com/rudiman/pharts
My Favorites: http://www.pbase.com/rudiman/my_favorites
Alaskan Cruise 2004: http://www.pbase.com/rudiman/alaska
Everything in my galleries, God Made. Its just my job to show them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top