Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Great question. I am coming from the 707 too and still do the focus
refocus thing too. I read somewhere here that is not good. I will
have to fing that article for you. I have had not had time to
really study it yet.
carrie
--Based on your graphic, it would be more like this???
![]()
than
![]()
???
Amy
Well, I think that's a leap, but not a bad one.So basically, the 9-points refer to the rule of thirds???
Here is a chart developed by a DP Review forum participant, Olaf
DK, showing the sensor sizes compared with the focus squares:
![]()
You will see that there are more "vertical" sensors than I had said
there were in my first post - my incipient senility, no doubt.
They aren't quite on the rule of thirds intersections, but very close. I tend automatically toward rule of thirds compositions, so I find that one of the focusing points at the "corners" more often than not fall on the part of the subject I want to focus on. That was definitely not true with the 10D pattern. Additionally, I find the joybutton much easier and more intuitive to manipulate while shooting that the 10D wheelie-dealie.Steven,
Thanks for your answers!
So basically, the 9-points refer to the rule of thirds???
I compose, select the point closest to where I want to focus, move the frame if necessary to get that targeted precisely, then do the slight recompose that might be necessary.Coming from the Sony 707 I am VERY used-to the focus-recompose
technique. I would use it all the time.
In reading around here, and on the web, "focus-recompose" doesn't
appear to be the best method with the 20D (or other dSLRs),
especially at wider apertures. I've been reading about the 9-point
focusing, and how to select the best point.
That is essentially why I do. Notice that I normally use a single selected point for lanscape. When taking family pictures, I am mostly in P&S mode. In fact now that I gave my 10D to my wife, I think I am out of the family picture buisness anyway.Ben_Egbert wrote:
[snip]
I just dont get why you would want to shoot with all AF points
enabled - Other than AI- Servo which probably works better that way.
--For normal shooting, I would find it rather pointless and annoying.
--
http://www.pbase.com/timothyo
![]()
They aren't quite on the rule of thirds intersections, but very
close. I tend automatically toward rule of thirds compositions, so
I find that one of the focusing points at the "corners" more often
than not fall on the part of the subject I want to focus on. That
was definitely not true with the 10D pattern. Additionally, I find
the joybutton much easier and more intuitive to manipulate while
shooting that the 10D wheelie-dealie.
So while I always used the center point with the 10D, I don't
always do so with the 20D. I might add that when I used a Canon
F-1, I frequently used an all-groundglass screen without a center
focusing aid for portraits, focusing on the eyes wherever they fell
in the composition. Using a tripod has never made "focus and
compose" very easy.
--
RDKirk
'TANSTAAFL: The only unbreakable rule in photography.'
I compose, select the point closest to where I want to focus, move
the frame if necessary to get that targeted precisely, then do the
slight recompose that might be necessary.
Yep, Mike, that's been my problem with selecting focus points - I know that in theory, it'll give me sharper pictures. And it really does, when I have an obedient subject. But when I'm chasing kids around, I get more good shots using the center point, focusing and recomposing than taking the time to choose the focus point.focus, and then press the shutter the shot is usually
gone(depending on what you're shooting of course... I don't think a
landscape is going to run away from you but a candid might).
I too am a firm believer in selecting AF points manually mainly because earlier EOS cameras including the 10D placed a huge bias on exposure and flash metering on the selected AF point.there's an artical by Chuck Westfall of Canon that recommends using
the focus points not Focus Lock and Recompose. Especially at wide
open apertures under a distance of 15'.
the reasoning is that they focus plain is then moved and as a
result increases the chance of Front or Back Focus.
folks here will debate the issue to death, but I'm on the side of
Chuck and believe him as an engineer for the Cameras. I've had
absolutely no focus issues with the 20D and I have switched
techniques to using the focus points as a result of his artical.
The artical is based on the 45pt AF system of the 1D bodies, but
the same is going to apply to the rest of the EOS systems too.
Just a few minutes of practice to get the technique, then just start using it. One trick about the joybutton--don't try to manipulate it with the ball of your thumb. Use the tip of your finger to grab one or two numbs.Hi Again RD,
Yes, your method is about what I considered. How do you find using
the 9-point when it comes to selecting the right point itself -- I
mean, has it become a fairly quick process for you now that you're
used to doing it. I don't want to be fumbling with buttons and such
all the time if it's a cumbersome process. I realize for any action
shots, the 9-point system really isn't an options, but other than
that...
The fact that the outer points are blind to parallel linear contrasts is often useful in separating the subject from a background with competing contrasts.You really can't beat the accuracy of center point focus. If you
use 9 pt focus you just never know what the camera will focus on.
I'd rather manual focus than use 9 point.
I think they were just spreading them out as far as they could within the price point. The only camera that did it deliberately was the Contax digital.Thanks RD,
I supposed when I get out there and shoot, I will answer some of
these questions myself, but I do wonder what Canon's intention is
with the 9 point system -- was it towards the rule of thirds? Or
more like Steven suggested (which I've dubbed "rule of wacky
thirds")
The points actually are closer to the ideal spots for the Golden Section intersections. (The "Rule" of Thirds itself is just a simplification of Golden Section lines). Whether this was intentional on Canon's part I have no idea.Thanks RD,
I supposed when I get out there and shoot, I will answer some of
these questions myself, but I do wonder what Canon's intention is
with the 9 point system -- was it towards the rule of thirds? Or
more like Steven suggested (which I've dubbed "rule of wacky
thirds")
--They aren't quite on the rule of thirds intersections, but very
close. I tend automatically toward rule of thirds compositions, so
I find that one of the focusing points at the "corners" more often
than not fall on the part of the subject I want to focus on. That
was definitely not true with the 10D pattern. Additionally, I find
the joybutton much easier and more intuitive to manipulate while
shooting that the 10D wheelie-dealie.
So while I always used the center point with the 10D, I don't
always do so with the 20D. I might add that when I used a Canon
F-1, I frequently used an all-groundglass screen without a center
focusing aid for portraits, focusing on the eyes wherever they fell
in the composition. Using a tripod has never made "focus and
compose" very easy.
--
RDKirk
'TANSTAAFL: The only unbreakable rule in photography.'
For objects greater than 15 feet away, using the centre point and recomposing seems to work just fine for focus (the fifteen foot figure comes from the Canon literature - although aimed at the 1 series cameras rather than the 20 or 10D) - separating the exposure and focus functions as described in other posts may help under some circumstances where final composition is critical to get the exposure right.Coming from the Sony 707 I am VERY used-to the focus-recompose
technique. I would use it all the time.
In reading around here, and on the web, "focus-recompose" doesn't
appear to be the best method with the 20D (or other dSLRs),
especially at wider apertures. I've been reading about the 9-point
focusing, and how to select the best point.
So I have some questions
First -- do a lot of you still use center-point focus and then do
focus-recompose, and how are your results?
Second -- for those of you using the 9-point focus... do you find
you can do so quickly? Was it just a matter of getting used to
doing it?
For objects greater than 15 feet away, using the centre point andComing from the Sony 707 I am VERY used-to the focus-recompose
technique. I would use it all the time.
In reading around here, and on the web, "focus-recompose" doesn't
appear to be the best method with the 20D (or other dSLRs),
especially at wider apertures. I've been reading about the 9-point
focusing, and how to select the best point.
So I have some questions
First -- do a lot of you still use center-point focus and then do
focus-recompose, and how are your results?
Second -- for those of you using the 9-point focus... do you find
you can do so quickly? Was it just a matter of getting used to
doing it?
recomposing seems to work just fine for focus (the fifteen foot
figure comes from the Canon literature - although aimed at the 1
series cameras rather than the 20 or 10D) - separating the exposure
and focus functions as described in other posts may help under some
circumstances where final composition is critical to get the
exposure right.
Closer distances and wide apertures can be more problematic - head
shots taken at f1.8 can lead to a nose tip rather than an eye being
in focus, and if possible I use the focus point that gives the
least possible shift in recomposition.Using the joystick on the 20D
is pretty quick (I have the custom function enabled that gives me
instant control over the focus points by using the joystick) For
realy close up work manual focus and a tripod is best - although
I'd love a focussing aid on the focus screen.
The only time I use multipoint focus with all the points turned on
is AI servo mode. Here locking on to the object with the centre
point and then letting all the points track seems to work
brilliantly, in conjuntion with burst mode shooting. I took over
100 shots of my daugher body surfing, using a 90-300mm lens at
300mm and every single one of them was acceptably sharp straight
out of the camera, despite the speed she was moving at and the
possibility of locking on to other people or waves in the water.