Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is the first option in this thread that I actually like. None of the others seem to offer the impact protection that the OEM cover would provide. Are you using this yourself? It states in the bh descreption that it clips in place like the OEM cover. Is this part plastic? Does it fit as good as the OEM cover?
in buying something to cover the screen, only to have to lift it up
to veiw it, does not make any sense, if you dont use it at all,
then yes, cover it up, but i have not yet met one person who uses a
digital cam that does not use the screen, so to me it's a complete
no brainer, i mean, it protects the screen, but so does the oem
version, the black full cover version is $30 (£15) or there abouts,
where as the oem is $12 (£6), they both do the same thing dont
they!???
--
Simon
Check out the face behind the text at
http://www.pbase.com/image/27670744
On fotopic http://gallery55230.fotopic.net/
Nah. Use the LCD cover until you lose it. Also, I wrapTrash that LCD cover and replace it with piece of plastic lamanate
sheeting; the replacement price for a whole new LCD screen is $20.
For a high volume piece of plastic, the margin would decrease but the profits would still be tremendous. And, you don't really know if it wouldThe cover is clear because of the injection molding process. Using
that process the only way to get a black cover with clear screen is
to make it in two parts (one black one clear), or do a secondary
operation like masking/painting or if you want to be fancy, in-mold
decoration. Any of those processes would significantly increase the
part price and would either effect the retail price or nikon's
margins.
For a high volume piece of plastic, the margin would decrease butThe cover is clear because of the injection molding process. Using
that process the only way to get a black cover with clear screen is
to make it in two parts (one black one clear), or do a secondary
operation like masking/painting or if you want to be fancy, in-mold
decoration. Any of those processes would significantly increase the
part price and would either effect the retail price or nikon's
margins.
the profits would still be tremendous. And, you don't really know
if it would
cost more. It is quite possible that the material cost if lower
and yield is higher for the black portion .
Finally, not all of us use the LCD that much. I'm at the point that
I've got my camera set up in a way that suits my needs. I'm also
confident in knowing how too set up everything for a myriad of
situations to get the shot. I rarely use the LCD anymore.
in buying something to cover the screen, only to have to lift it up
to veiw it, does not make any sense, if you dont use it at all,
then yes, cover it up, but i have not yet met one person who uses a
digital cam that does not use the screen, so to me it's a complete
no brainer, i mean, it protects the screen, but so does the oem
version, the black full cover version is $30 (£15) or there abouts,
where as the oem is $12 (£6), they both do the same thing dont
they!???
--
Simon
Check out the face behind the text at
http://www.pbase.com/image/27670744
On fotopic http://gallery55230.fotopic.net/
I'm not looking to NOKIAfy the D70 with snoopy-patterned covers, I
just thought that a black cover, with clear window to view LCD
screen would have looked less obtrusive.
Just an opinion....
Aussie Dave
Oh boy, here we go....
Seriously, it is meant for protection as well as being able to see
through it after taking a picture.