i have the photosolve.com lens adapter for my dc4800.
i have not had the chance to compare it directly w/
kodak's version since it has not arrived yet
oh well, i guess i should count myself lucky, cuz otherwise,
i would not have the PS version right now.
the "rubber" used is "textured" so it acts like a sponge.
it creates tiny pockets of vacuum when slipped onto the
dc4800 (to put it elegantly). to take it off you twist slightly
(to break the vacuum seal) and pull. the fit is very snug
and i definitely don't see any alignment problems. the
one i have is well manufactured, so it has a true 90degrees
cut (i checked).
how strong is the seal? as long as you do not use your
camera as a sling shot, you can hold the camera by the
adapter. (do note the part about not flinging it around)
as for wear and tear, i do not really know. i believe mr.
williams (the owner) has a dc4800, so you might want to post
a msg on his bulletin board and ask how the paint on his
dc4800 is fairing.
personally, i keep my adapter on my camera at all times
it protects the protruding lens barrow and i plan on buying
a 43mm UV filter to totally seal out dust and other bad things.
(not a bad idea if i do say so myself.)
of course that is just my personal preference, and it does help
that my dc4800 case (the grey one from kodak) allows me
to close the cover w/ the lens adapter attached.
Looking at the pictures of the xtend a lens adapter and the real
Kodak adapter...
How does the kodak mount?
I see that the xtend a lens has a rubber grip on it...and of course
is aluminum ..
Is one mount better than the other? thanx..
I know there is a zillion posts on this, but haven't seen the
differences in mounting it...j-bo