Canon 4000 & 5000-1 Picoliter diffrence noticable?

mshred

Member
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Location
Prescott, AZ, US
Can get the Pixma 5000 for $169.00 at Staples. The Pixma 4000 is holding at $149.00. Is the 1 picoliter difference going to be discernable at the largest print size on both printers? Is the 5000 a better made printer overall and is the $20 dollar price difference make this printer (5000) a steal? Any thoughts?
Thanks
Matt Turner
http://www.pbase.com/diapirs
 
Depneds on what you plan to print, based on what I've read the 4000 replaces the i860, and the 5000 replaces the i960, although it's only 4 color and not 6 like the i960. I have the 5000, and love the results, blows away the i860 i have, slightly better than my s9000, but not as good as the epson 2200 except for glossy. Given the price, I'd go with the 5000
Can get the Pixma 5000 for $169.00 at Staples. The Pixma 4000 is
holding at $149.00. Is the 1 picoliter difference going to be
discernable at the largest print size on both printers? Is the 5000
a better made printer overall and is the $20 dollar price
difference make this printer (5000) a steal? Any thoughts?
Thanks
Matt Turner
http://www.pbase.com/diapirs
 
For what it's worth, the PC Magazine review (Nov. 2004) says the ip5000 does better text and graphics than the ip4000, but actually worse on photos, citing posterization and a tint in monochrome prints.
Can get the Pixma 5000 for $169.00 at Staples. The Pixma 4000 is
holding at $149.00. Is the 1 picoliter difference going to be
discernable at the largest print size on both printers? Is the 5000
a better made printer overall and is the $20 dollar price
difference make this printer (5000) a steal? Any thoughts?
Thanks
Matt Turner
http://www.pbase.com/diapirs
 
Depneds on what you plan to print, based on what I've read the 4000
replaces the i860, and the 5000 replaces the i960, although it's
only 4 color and not 6 like the i960. I have the 5000, and love
the results, blows away the i860 i have, slightly better than my
s9000, but not as good as the epson 2200 except for glossy. Given
the price, I'd go with the 5000
Would it be better to get an i960 while they are still available?
 
Get i960, no contest between the two...
Depneds on what you plan to print, based on what I've read the 4000
replaces the i860, and the 5000 replaces the i960, although it's
only 4 color and not 6 like the i960. I have the 5000, and love
the results, blows away the i860 i have, slightly better than my
s9000, but not as good as the epson 2200 except for glossy. Given
the price, I'd go with the 5000
Would it be better to get an i960 while they are still available?
--
Just shoot! =)
 
Would it be better to get an i960 while they are still available?
Which Canon printer would you recommend given the $100 Visa card "rebate" I can get with the purchase of a Canon printer and the 20D I just picked up (other than the i960 for which there is no rebate)? I note from some of your other posts you have/had an ip4000. Would the ip8500 be a good solution, or is the "red" issue still a potential problem? Although the i960 can be had for less than $100, the $100 Canon/Visa deal is hard to pass up, especially if I look at Pixma printers that are positioned below the ip8500.

Aside from print quality, the archival issues with Canon ink may have me looking elsewhere in any event (possibly Epson, possibly a non-inkjet).

Thanks,

Lou
 
For what it's worth, the PC Magazine review (Nov. 2004) says the
ip5000 does better text and graphics than the ip4000, but actually
worse on photos, citing posterization and a tint in monochrome
prints.
I don't believe that review. Don't see why the photo quality on the ip4000 should be better, considering that the two seem to be technically identical apart from a slight advantage to the 5000 due to the smaller droplet size.
 
The 1picoliter is only used on the Canon Glossy Photo Paper setting and will not be used for other types of papers. I have the 5000 and think the print quality is excellent. I believe that it also has more nozzels on the print head than the 4000 also.
JimK
Can get the Pixma 5000 for $169.00 at Staples. The Pixma 4000 is
holding at $149.00. Is the 1 picoliter difference going to be
discernable at the largest print size on both printers? Is the 5000
a better made printer overall and is the $20 dollar price
difference make this printer (5000) a steal? Any thoughts?
Thanks
Matt Turner
http://www.pbase.com/diapirs
 
Hi Lou,

Well, my girlfriend has the IP4000, and I have the i960. I can tell you from experience that you can't go wrong with Canon. However, there are tradeoffs with any brand you get. Epson's using the pigment inks are practically indestructible for a WHILE. However, the gamut is not as large as say the Canon's. The Canon's are great printers, however, they use dyes which tend to fade unless you use the right papers and do some work on your part.

So it's a toss up. Whatever you do, make sure you know what you want and you do the research. I think a lot of people just buy a printer then run into all the issues afterwards. i960 for $100 is a great deal, and even if you don't like it, it's $100 compared to say spending $500 or more.

Hope that helps.
Would it be better to get an i960 while they are still available?
Which Canon printer would you recommend given the $100 Visa card
"rebate" I can get with the purchase of a Canon printer and the 20D
I just picked up (other than the i960 for which there is no
rebate)? I note from some of your other posts you have/had an
ip4000. Would the ip8500 be a good solution, or is the "red"
issue still a potential problem? Although the i960 can be had for
less than $100, the $100 Canon/Visa deal is hard to pass up,
especially if I look at Pixma printers that are positioned below
the ip8500.

Aside from print quality, the archival issues with Canon ink may
have me looking elsewhere in any event (possibly Epson, possibly a
non-inkjet).

Thanks,

Lou
--
Just shoot! =)
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top