Hacked Firmware -a new trend? 5 models & counting...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jim Cockfield
  • Start date Start date
J

Jim Cockfield

Guest
I think we're seeing a new trend guys....

Yesterday, I was surprised to learn that yet another camera was hacked.

This time, it was the Konica-Minolta DiMAGE Z2 (gives it the ability to shoot in RAW).

So far, I've seen hacked firmware for the Canon EOS-300D/Digital Rebel, Nikon Coolpix 2100, Nikon Coolpix 3100, Nikon Coolpix 3700, and now the Konica-Minolta DiMAGE Z2.

The Nikon and Konica-Minolta models get the ability to shoot in RAW mode (in a format unsupported by their manufacturers).

There may even be more that I haven't discovered. Most of the hacked firmware seems to be originating in Russia.

I suspect that the RAW mode is relatively easy to hack... Most models probably have a hidden RAW mode since the camera has to convert from RAW to JPEG anyway, and RAW may be needed for factory test purposes.

For example, I've got a little Konica KD-510z that has a RAW mode via a very well hidden menu choice (but no hacked firmware that I'm aware of).

I suspect that manufacturers are just hiding features that many cameras have for marketing purposes.

So, it looks like we're beginning to see a trend where firmware is being hacked to enable hidden features.

--
JimC
------
http://www.pbase.com/jcockfield/konica_kd510z
 
I'd like to see how the hacks works. Perhaps I could improve my favorite digicams such as the Pentax 43wr and Canons. Show me the code and I'll show you a better camera. :-)

Daniel
I think we're seeing a new trend guys....

Yesterday, I was surprised to learn that yet another camera was
hacked.

This time, it was the Konica-Minolta DiMAGE Z2 (gives it the
ability to shoot in RAW).

So far, I've seen hacked firmware for the Canon EOS-300D/Digital
Rebel, Nikon Coolpix 2100, Nikon Coolpix 3100, Nikon Coolpix 3700,
and now the Konica-Minolta DiMAGE Z2.

The Nikon and Konica-Minolta models get the ability to shoot in RAW
mode (in a format unsupported by their manufacturers).

There may even be more that I haven't discovered. Most of the
hacked firmware seems to be originating in Russia.

I suspect that the RAW mode is relatively easy to hack... Most
models probably have a hidden RAW mode since the camera has to
convert from RAW to JPEG anyway, and RAW may be needed for factory
test purposes.

For example, I've got a little Konica KD-510z that has a RAW mode
via a very well hidden menu choice (but no hacked firmware that I'm
aware of).

I suspect that manufacturers are just hiding features that many
cameras have for marketing purposes.

So, it looks like we're beginning to see a trend where firmware is
being hacked to enable hidden features.

--
JimC
 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canondigicamhacking/
Daniel
I think we're seeing a new trend guys....

Yesterday, I was surprised to learn that yet another camera was
hacked.

This time, it was the Konica-Minolta DiMAGE Z2 (gives it the
ability to shoot in RAW).

So far, I've seen hacked firmware for the Canon EOS-300D/Digital
Rebel, Nikon Coolpix 2100, Nikon Coolpix 3100, Nikon Coolpix 3700,
and now the Konica-Minolta DiMAGE Z2.

The Nikon and Konica-Minolta models get the ability to shoot in RAW
mode (in a format unsupported by their manufacturers).

There may even be more that I haven't discovered. Most of the
hacked firmware seems to be originating in Russia.

I suspect that the RAW mode is relatively easy to hack... Most
models probably have a hidden RAW mode since the camera has to
convert from RAW to JPEG anyway, and RAW may be needed for factory
test purposes.

For example, I've got a little Konica KD-510z that has a RAW mode
via a very well hidden menu choice (but no hacked firmware that I'm
aware of).

I suspect that manufacturers are just hiding features that many
cameras have for marketing purposes.

So, it looks like we're beginning to see a trend where firmware is
being hacked to enable hidden features.

--
JimC
 
do you know where i could find out more about the z2 hack?
I think we're seeing a new trend guys....

Yesterday, I was surprised to learn that yet another camera was
hacked.

This time, it was the Konica-Minolta DiMAGE Z2 (gives it the
ability to shoot in RAW).

So far, I've seen hacked firmware for the Canon EOS-300D/Digital
Rebel, Nikon Coolpix 2100, Nikon Coolpix 3100, Nikon Coolpix 3700,
and now the Konica-Minolta DiMAGE Z2.

The Nikon and Konica-Minolta models get the ability to shoot in RAW
mode (in a format unsupported by their manufacturers).

There may even be more that I haven't discovered. Most of the
hacked firmware seems to be originating in Russia.

I suspect that the RAW mode is relatively easy to hack... Most
models probably have a hidden RAW mode since the camera has to
convert from RAW to JPEG anyway, and RAW may be needed for factory
test purposes.

For example, I've got a little Konica KD-510z that has a RAW mode
via a very well hidden menu choice (but no hacked firmware that I'm
aware of).

I suspect that manufacturers are just hiding features that many
cameras have for marketing purposes.

So, it looks like we're beginning to see a trend where firmware is
being hacked to enable hidden features.

--
JimC
------
http://www.pbase.com/jcockfield/konica_kd510z
--
KM Dimage Z2
http://www.pbase.com/diamond2a
 
that Phil frowns upon links to hacked firmware....

So, to keep my good standing (in hope that this thread isn't
"pushing it" already), I'm not going to post a link.
I'll ask Phil,

But we've had an awful lot of hacked firmware threads (I've started a few myself) with no comment from the big guy...

Now, if you start asking for serial numbers or cracks for popular programs, that's an instant ban.

--
A cyberstalker told me not to post anymore...
So I'm posting even more!

Ciao!

Joe

http://www.swissarmyfork.com
 
Why?
Open source is a good thing. It allows people to improve the
products. Can you imagine a chevy that was closed? You couldn't
add headers, turbo charger, 440 engine, etc...

Daniel
Daniel:

I've seen other posters comment that Phil frowns upon links to hacked firmware (and that threads containing links to the Russian hack for the Digital Rebel were deleted). That's what I was basing my assumption on.

Now, I just searched the forums and found this (I now just read it for first time). So, apparently it's true that Phil does not want links to hacked firmware:

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1031&message=8431793

As for the donations requested or not requested issue.... Until he says otherwise, even if the authors of the hacked firmware are not asking for donations, I'm going to respect Phil's wishes. It's his web site.

--
JimC
------
http://www.pbase.com/jcockfield/konica_kd510z
 
I think the situation is significantly different. Asking for and receiving programming info is different then providing copyrighted software and asking money for it.

Thanks,
Daniel
Why?
Open source is a good thing. It allows people to improve the
products. Can you imagine a chevy that was closed? You couldn't
add headers, turbo charger, 440 engine, etc...

Daniel
Daniel:

I've seen other posters comment that Phil frowns upon links to
hacked firmware (and that threads containing links to the Russian
hack for the Digital Rebel were deleted). That's what I was
basing my assumption on.

Now, I just searched the forums and found this (I now just read it
for first time). So, apparently it's true that Phil does not want
links to hacked firmware:

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1031&message=8431793

As for the donations requested or not requested issue.... Until he
says otherwise, even if the authors of the hacked firmware are not
asking for donations, I'm going to respect Phil's wishes. It's
his web site.

--
JimC
------
http://www.pbase.com/jcockfield/konica_kd510z
 
I think the situation is significantly different. Asking for and
receiving programming info is different then providing copyrighted
software and asking money for it.
Links to hacked firmware is not really "programming info"...

Perhaps we're talking about two different things here.

Phil's stance on links to hacked firmware was in his post about it:

"Guys, I'm not going to be drawn into a long debate about the rights and wrongs of the 'hacking' that is going on but two things are clear to me (a) it's clear piracy, the firmware on the camera is copyrighted software which is being taken modified and provided for download, (b) the author(s?) of this firmware have asked for 'donations' of money, that makes it doubly bad in my book."

"So please no more direct links to this"

He didn't say "a" was OK without "b". So, until he does, I'm not going to supply links on his forums to firmware that has been hacked.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1031&message=8431793

--
JimC
------
http://www.pbase.com/jcockfield/konica_kd510z
 
I think the situation is significantly different. Asking for and
receiving programming info is different then providing copyrighted
software and asking money for it.
Links to hacked firmware is not really "programming info"...

Perhaps we're talking about two different things here.
Yes, we are. Sorry for the confusion. My earlier request for a web site that has an intro into hacking cameras goes unanswered.

Thanks,
Daniel
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top