1DmK ii vs 20d

Right, Steve. Nice speech. Now I have to get back to shooting.

Steve Rosa said:

frety said:

Search. The two cameras have zippo to do with each other.

Click to expand...

Not to be argumentative, but they both can:

Take professional photos
Turn out masterpieces
Make your wife’s day with a photo of your kids
Make lots of money in the right hands

They are both Just a tool - no more, no less. Right tool for the
right job and in most cases if you have skill and experience, you
can be just as successful with either. (One may just make it easier
to get there
-Steven

Click to expand...

Based on what Chief has said and that I am not rolling in the dough, the 20D sounds like it would do the job. Also like the idea of spending the dough on telephoto glass. If forgot about the 1.3 v.1.6 FOV, that actually sounds better to have more telephoto for sports. Plus I think since the 20D can take the EF-S lenses (which will allow more wide angle,like the 10-22 instead of the 16-35) that the field of view will be less of an issue.

Thanks for all the responses,

AJ

Greg M said:

Have you tried the 20D for sports?

Click to expand...

Yes, I did today. A very capable tool.

Regards
Stefan

--

»We've experienced the fact that the perceptions of an expert surpass the precision of measuring instruments.« Nakabayashi-san of Canon, Inc.