Reading mode: Light Dark

F828 manual online!

Go to last post
...that's enough to be useful. blows away the 300D, which is barely better than my 707 in that department. Still not sure if I'm upgrading yet, I'll let some of you early adopters pay for the priviledge of being beta testers. When I know the water is fine, I'm probably likely to to take the plunge.

Ciao,
MikeD
 
While I wouldn't say "blows away" on this feature, it does put it squarely between the 300D and the 10D as far as timing goes. We'll have to see how it really performs, but it's encouraging.
Mike_D said:
...that's enough to be useful. blows away the 300D, which is barely
better than my 707 in that department. Still not sure if I'm
upgrading yet, I'll let some of you early adopters pay for the
priviledge of being beta testers. When I know the water is fine,
I'm probably likely to to take the plunge.

Ciao,
MikeD
Click to expand...
--

Ulysses
 
cannot find file numbering by date like on the nikon cameras, only sequential numbers. too sad really.

dsc200311172230.jpeg is so much better then DSC0001.jpeg.

if anyone finds date/time numbering, please corrct me with page number, i just missed ut then.

kb
 
I agree with BOTH of you...

My original concern was obvious - a ISO of 100 from the Drebel would mean that Sony would need something much less than 100 to compete from a noise standpoint. So I am glad to see 64.

I also agree that I would have loved to have seen a 1600 in there too - but I bet 1600 with a 2/3rds sensor would have meant pictures like the FujS7000 is producing ... ie NOISEY.
Ulysses said:
magnu said:
Ulysses said:
Or I suppose if you want to go outside for night shots, but you
won't get exposures as nice in that situation.

Better to have it than to not.
Photo Newbe said:
magnu said:
http://www.docs.sony.com/release/DSCF828.pdf
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
--

Ulysses
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
--

Ulysses
Click to expand...
 
Anyone notice color reproduction settings on page 74? Two modes...standard and REAL...no kidding. Sounds like standard is in-camera processing and REAL maybe the RAW mode? Sound right to anyone else?

Ken
 
Photo Newbe said:
My original concern was obvious - a ISO of 100 from the Drebel
would mean that Sony would need something much less than 100 to
compete from a noise standpoint. So I am glad to see 64.
Click to expand...
I'm happy to see it too. But it's no "answer" for the low noise of the Rebel in and of itself. Not for medium to low light. Thank goodness for that fast lens, though.
Photo Newbe said:
I also agree that I would have loved to have seen a 1600 in there
too - but I bet 1600 with a 2/3rds sensor would have meant pictures
like the FujS7000 is producing ... ie NOISEY.
Click to expand...
Thank goodness for Noise Ninja!

Hope they come up with a plug-in for Photoshop!

--

Ulysses
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top