Daniel Craig --- too good to be true??

[Daniel Craig]

My mistake. They are here:

http://www.iapdatacom.net/members/catman/Dans_Site.htm

Please, please, Gordon-- tell me you made this web page. Tell me
this is not real...
--
http://www.pbase.com/dnewell228/

That must be a compliment of some sort.

 

[simon Beal]

Heaven forbid!

I could not help but notice you are out there a-posting on other
threads this evening. Don't you think that a thread that is soley
about YOU is worth your input?
--
http://www.pbase.com/dnewell228/

 

[MateoV]

OMG I hope someone put this up as a joke.

http://www.pbase.com/image/1706805

--MateoV, Cannon G2 http://www.pbase.com/mateov

 

[Jens Jakob]

Hello all

This thred is beginning to turn cruel - lets be gentlemen/women and stop this thread now.

In the future, we all need to behave, think about what we write, and think about if we might hurt someone with our wording, instead of keep on treading in people toes.

Lets live in harmony and photography, please?

JJ

 

[Paige87621]

Jens, I have to say that you should be commended for your position. I can assume from your comments that you are not one of the fine people on this forum whom Daniel has attacked personally? Can I point out that I was not as lucky.

Paige

Hello all

This thred is beginning to turn cruel - lets be gentlemen/women and
stop this thread now.

In the future, we all need to behave, think about what we write,
and think about if we might hurt someone with our wording, instead
of keep on treading in people toes.

Lets live in harmony and photography, please?

 

[JillSch]

Perhaps a solution would be to ask for "CONSTRUCTIVE" comments instead of "ANY" comments so that certain people do not feel that it is their public duty to make an idiot of themselves.
--cheers,Jill

 

[Jens Jakob]

Hello Paige

Thank you for your reply.

I was also "commented" by Daniel. But even so, I will still stand on my comments about this thread beginning to become cruel.

I do like to work for world peace between all mankind, you know ;-))

JJ

Paige

Hello all

This thred is beginning to turn cruel - lets be gentlemen/women and
stop this thread now.

In the future, we all need to behave, think about what we write,
and think about if we might hurt someone with our wording, instead
of keep on treading in people toes.

Lets live in harmony and photography, please?

 

[David N.]

Hello all

This thred is beginning to turn cruel - lets be gentlemen/women and
stop this thread now.

In the future, we all need to behave, think about what we write,
and think about if we might hurt someone with our wording, instead
of keep on treading in people toes.

Lets live in harmony and photography, please?

OK, OK... since I started this thing, I will call an end to it. I think I have proven my initial theory wrong, that the initial picture was a fake. That was my only point in starting this thread. I stand corrected.
-- http://www.pbase.com/dnewell228/

 

[mike savad]

some of the pictures that I posted were done with a $74 digi cam I
bought over a year ago. It's highes pix rating is 352 X288--overy
100,000 pixels!!! The name of it is the Quickpix1 (Qp1) and you
can see at at the foloowing site:
http://www.nisis.com
Just click on the logo for digital cameras--then when you get to
the next screec--click on the Qp1. It is actually capable of
taking decent pictures outside and does wonders to clouds. But it
has never done well inside and hasn't any flash.

I don't know what you mean by your french expression--but I take it
to mean something about the quality of a couple of my
pictures--most especially where I am on the couch with my dog
GoldiBear. It wouldn't have been too bad if the thumbnail thingy
hadn't blown it up like it did. I might be able to fix that--much
later.

so let me get this right, you direct us to this page. http://www.iapdatacom.net/members/catman/Dans_Site.htm to show off the camera of all camera's the s30, and you used a different camera for the page?

why?

---Mike Savad
-- http://www.pbase.com/savad/

 

[Ruffian]

so let me get this right, you direct us to this page.
http://www.iapdatacom.net/members/catman/Dans_Site.htm to show off
the camera of all camera's the s30, and you used a different camera
for the page?

That is infinitely G A Y

kthxbye--Underbid the competitors and then, after the customer is committed, say, 'Oops, you really need to buy more stuff to make this work. Did I forget to mention that?' -- Scott Adams =[ The Dilbert Future ]=Goto http://www.printerboyweb.net/G2 for my own little gallery. =)

 

[Daniel Craig]

OK, OK... since I started this thing, I will call an end to it. I
think I have proven my initial theory wrong, that the initial
picture was a fake. That was my only point in starting this
thread. I stand corrected.

--
http://www.pbase.com/dnewell228/

The initial picture was not a fake--but if you are calling this off, that lets me off the hook on posting another picture of me. But I wasn't going to get the USA paper either. If I want to buy gossip, I'll buy People magazine or the National Enquirer. It's the same reason I never listen to evening news any more. Now that I think about it, I can't believe I was actually going to follow through with a picture today--now that's being mental. And another thing, I don't take any of the shots made at me as being personal--why should I? This has been a humorous thread to follow. I don't attack people here--they attack me cause I say that their pictures of their camera isn't any good. I'm the VICTIM! But I think it's funny. Send me a dollar anyway, David N.

 

[Daniel Craig]

so let me get this right, you direct us to this page.
http://www.iapdatacom.net/members/catman/Dans_Site.htm to show off
the camera of all camera's the s30, and you used a different camera
for the page?

That is infinitely G A Y

kthxbye
--
Underbid the competitors and then, after the customer is committed,
say, 'Oops, you really need to buy more stuff to make this work.
Did I forget to mention that?' -- Scott Adams =[ The Dilbert Future
]=
Goto http://www.printerboyweb.net/G2 for my own little gallery. =)

The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune. But a good point that I should take the non S30 pictures down. I will--when I feel like it.

 

[David N.]

I'm the VICTIM! But I
think it's funny. Send me a dollar anyway, David N.

You've earned it.

http://www.pbase.com/image/1713095

-- http://www.pbase.com/dnewell228/

 

[mike savad]

so let me get this right, you direct us to this page.
http://www.iapdatacom.net/members/catman/Dans_Site.htm to show off
the camera of all camera's the s30, and you used a different camera
for the page?

That is infinitely G A Y

kthxbye
--
Underbid the competitors and then, after the customer is committed,
say, 'Oops, you really need to buy more stuff to make this work.
Did I forget to mention that?' -- Scott Adams =[ The Dilbert Future
]=
Goto http://www.printerboyweb.net/G2 for my own little gallery. =)

The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune. But a good point that
I should take the non S30 pictures down. I will--when I feel like
it.

so what was the point of that page?

you call it an s30 page - and yet none of them are taken with that camera?

are any of those pictures done with the s30?

you directed us to a page that supposedly highlights, the camera of all camera's the s30 - and none of those pictures are done with that camera?

---Mike Savad

-- http://www.pbase.com/savad/

 

[Will53889]

After I read one of the responses by this person in another thread, I figure it is a waste of time to read anything posted by this person. It's not that he critiques, it's the way he chooses to do it. It seems like this persons intent is just to stir up some trouble. Won't jump to any conclusions but it wouldn't be a big leap to say this is not a happy person. Think about it, would you be doing this if you were happy? You have one guess.

 

[Daniel Craig]

After I read one of the responses by this person in another thread,
I figure it is a waste of time to read anything posted by this
person. It's not that he critiques, it's the way he chooses to do
it. It seems like this persons intent is just to stir up some
trouble. Won't jump to any conclusions but it wouldn't be a big
leap to say this is not a happy person. Think about it, would you
be doing this if you were happy? You have one guess.

You're the one who sounds unhappy. Think about it.

 

[Daniel Craig]

so what was the point of that page?

you call it an s30 page - and yet none of them are taken with that
camera?

are any of those pictures done with the s30?

you directed us to a page that supposedly highlights, the camera of
all camera's the s30 - and none of those pictures are done with
that camera?

---Mike Savad

ok a re-did the album--go to this link and click on photos

http://www.iapdatacom.net/members/catman/Dans_Site.htm

By the way, it is still not what I had intended. I created the album in a way that re-sizes all pictures to fit the screen--it enlarges them--too much so on most of the pictures--many of which I intended to take up only a quarter of the page. I'll get it right soon. Maybe even before you click on the link above.

 

[Daniel Craig]

By the way, I'm in the process right now of fixing it--it is 2:25 est it will be repaired by 3:30 for sure.

And I did put one pic in that was done by my "cheap" camera. Though I doubt that you'll be able to figure out which one.

 

[Will53889]

Dee docteur eez in. Pleez seat down and explain you problem. How long been feelin dis hostility? Deez forum only vay for you to vent zee fustration? Meebee takz sup hobbie lika...lika....photo-graffy? Dont a seem to be helpin mooch? Keepa at teet. Und...count to 10 nix time. Und keep busy wid da school werk. Vut grade you in now? Next time we werk on you a maturity. Feelin betta? Dis forum did sum good, no? No charges zees time.

After I read one of the responses by this person in another thread,
I figure it is a waste of time to read anything posted by this
person. It's not that he critiques, it's the way he chooses to do
it. It seems like this persons intent is just to stir up some
trouble. Won't jump to any conclusions but it wouldn't be a big
leap to say this is not a happy person. Think about it, would you
be doing this if you were happy? You have one guess.

You're the one who sounds unhappy. Think about it.

 

[Will53889]

I have a hypothesis: Dan may not be all he appears to be.

As long as we are hypothisising: here is mine:

Danny Boy is a bully. Nothing but an internet version of the
classic school yard bully.

Nah, he's a trolling. It doesn't take much to figure this is not a happy person. Duh. He's only here to stir up some s* t. Oh, he'll make some legit posts just to cover up his reason for being here, otherwise he'll really be transparent.