Shootout: Pro with amateur gear vs amateur with pro gear

Oh come on lets be real... it is your photoshop skills and social media marketing that determines your success as a photographer nowadays above anything else...

Good gear gives you a better initial starting point, and in same cases like telephoto or wide...the ability to capture images that would not be possible otherwise, after that its how high you can turn up the saturation to earn facebook likes.

3 months ago*permalink

Seldem read such a bad reply... "...after that its how high you can turn up the saturation to earn facebook likes" lol

3 months agopermalink

It's an exaggeration...but only a minor one as hyper manipulated, unrealistic photos are the most popular on social media....

Also, learn to spell it is SELDOM not SELDEM HAHAHAHAHA.

Too bad you can't afford an American college.

3 months agopermalink

Why would I want an American college? Here in Europe there are a long list of good places to study.

Please don't start your typical war cry of America First and only if its in the USA or produced in the USA is it any good @Sarah Terra... as we have unfortunately seen in other chat threads you are a racist and religeous bigot (numerous threads available to anyone who is interested)... so hows life with Rufus at the trailerpark?

3 months agopermalink

You are following me around the forums whining like a banned little Muslim not allowed to come to America... how'd you like that Supreme Court decision.

Maybe you should prey to Allah to be allowed to the airport again lol

3 months agopermalink

@Sarah Terra and again we have to endure your racist and myopic world views.

You seem to have forgotten this is a photography forum so either stay on track or go somewhere else where your anti social views and sewer level intelligence are welcomed.

3 months agopermalink

You are the one following me around, over a temper tantrum for being banned from the USA. Why respond to my comment if you can't handle the discussion?

I ask you again mr Muslim, are you that threatened by a woman who,likes to drive in her bikini that you start stalking her on a photography forum?

Creepy, case in point why you are banned from the US

3 months agopermalink

@Sarah Terra i am certainly not stalking you. I replied to an answer in this thread that i did not agree with. end of story.

As I have mentioned in another thread that you hijacked for your racist and bigoted views... I am english (thats in europe), I have no religion or religious views and if you would take only 30 seconds to view my website you would see that I have no problems photographing the female form.

Now you really do need to keep your hate speech and misguided views in check or book yourself into a mental hospital and they will medicate you accordingly...

3 months agopermalink

We'll let DPR decide, i reported you for harassment for contacting me on twitter as well, good riddance

3 months agopermalink

@Sarah Terra i never contacted you on twitter... another little lie to make you look good... that will not work either. you can lie to the forum as much and as often as you like but i and i am sure dpr have everything logged here so they will immediately be able to see who said what and when... and that will be a big problem for you due to all the racist, irrational and anti religious remarks you have made in this "photography" forum.

3 months agopermalink

Again, you are the one following me around on multiple sites. Id appreciate it if you left me alone, I don't know how many times i have to ask it or how a can be more clear.

When a woman says no, she means no iainlea

3 months agopermalink

@Sarah Terra dont try playing the sex card... your problem is you have been spreading hate and anti religeon speech here in a photograhy forum. You started it and you are now trying to finish it via turning it into a poor I am being followed thread. I hope you have reported it and that the admins take a long hard look at your racist and bigot tendencies. The admins will make the correct discision.

2 months agopermalink

all you have to do is stop messaging me i dont see what the problem is? Are you a stalker?

2 months ago*permalink

Not at all... as stated above you can try and BS your way out of this and the other thread _but_ at the end of the day you should seek medication for your views concerning anyone who is not american (some of my best friends are americans) and your religous views. End of story.

2 months agopermalink

Stalker Muslim please go away to your mosque

2 months agopermalink

@sarah terra you need to seek medication for your views concerning anyone who is not american and your religous views. Unbelievable that you are being allowed to sprout your racist views. You need a lesson in respecting other peoples views and lifestyles. Just so you have the facts sarah... i am english, live in germany and have no interest in any religion... i hope that helps you when formulating your next set of insults. End of story.

2 months agopermalink

please stop contacting me on twitter creeper, I'm not interested

2 months agopermalink

@Sarah Terra please stop spreading your BS. So which twitter user is contacting you? you now have a being followed complex to add to your everything non-US hate complex.

As I have stated _numerous_ times please seek help and let them prescribe the correct medication for you to protect us all from you and your sick sick views!

2 months agopermalink

I think it is pretty obvious here who the one with the problem is. You have followed me around on multiple sites now all because I support the trump travel ban, then when you saw my picture and found out I was attractive you tried to be all friendly.... all you have to do is just stop messaging me, stay in your country where you belong, and leave me alone. Keep pushing iain and I will start sending copies of your messages to your female clients. LEAVE ME ALONE

2 months agopermalink

@Sarah Terra As I have stated _numerous_ times please seek help and let them prescribe the correct medication for you to protect us all from you and your sick views!

2 months agopermalink

If only u could afford to take me on a date. Buying mcdonalds in American dollars would bankrupt you and your entire mosque

So happy with the travel ban, I live in the best place in the world free of holy wars and sharia law 8)))

2 months agopermalink

As I have stated _numerous_ times please seek help and let them prescribe the correct medication for you to protect us all from you and your sick views!

ps. i don't eat McD...

2 months agopermalink

You don't eat mcdonalds cuz your Islamic terrorist state has an economic embargo and McDonald's isn't allowed to be served there. The sign says McDonald's, the building looks like McDonald's, but when you go Inside it's curry and rice.

This travel ban is amazing, every day more and more deadbeats denied entry

2 months agopermalink

As I have stated _numerous_ times please seek help and let them prescribe the correct medication for you to protect us all from you and your sick views!

You still persist with your racist views even though I have stated I am English and not religous.

btw. was in NY and Miami 2 weeks ago... so what you what you going todo ;-) ?

2 months agopermalink

So remember when you originally posted and said you weren't going to the USA and that the travel ban was going to hurt tourism because you were going to visit somewhere else??

Hahahaha hahahaha another lying liberal hypocrite strikes again... almost like all this celebs who were moving to Canada.

Ahaha hahahaha, we are number 1, and the reason for that is the travel ban

2 months agopermalink

@Sarah Terra As I have stated _numerous_ times please seek help and let them prescribe the correct medication for you to protect us all from you and your distorted world view.

#1 in what? death by drugs, death by gunshot, death by obesity... ?

Now you get on over and visit uncle rufus at the trailerpark girl ;-)

2 months agopermalink

If the USA is so terrible and you think it is so crappy, and you SWORE to never visit again.... what were you doing in new york and miami?

HYPOCRITE!!!!

You honestly have to be the biggest, fakest, phony of liberal out there...you can't even stand by your opinions!!!!

More likely just a liar, from a muslim country, envious of our great nation

2 months agopermalink

@Sarah Terra please seek help and let them prescribe the correct medication for you to protect us all from you and your distorted world view.

2 months agopermalink

What kind of idiot complains about trump, then threatens to never visit again as some sort of wimpy protest ( as if anyone cares hahah!! ) then brags about visiting New York and Miami.... guess your principles are only online, in the real world you want to visit the best country on the planet under the rule of the best president...Donald Trump

1 month ago*permalink

@Sarah Terra please seek help and let them prescribe the correct medication for you to protect us all from you and your distorted world view.

ps. I don't need to complain about Donald Trump... why should I as he is a non-entity in my life as well as yours.. you were hoodwinked and still don't see it lol

1 month agopermalink

Im not the one who dissed the united states, threw a tantrum about never visiting again (claiming this would somehow hurt the economy) then bragged about "going to NY and Miami" 2 months later.

Seriously what an idiot, you summarize liberals everywhere

1 month agopermalink

@Sarah Terra please seek help and let them prescribe the correct medication for you to protect us all from you and your distorted world view.

4 weeks agopermalink

I feel so sad you have to pretend you don't like the USA, then secretly brag about visiting.

If you put half as much effort as you do whining about how unfair the world is, as you did working, you might be able to afford another plane ticket and visit the best country in the world.

2 weeks agopermalink

@Sarah Terra please seek help and let them prescribe the correct medication for you to protect us all from you and your distorted world view.

You are one sick women whose views are simply anti-social, racist and deviant.

Seek help or at least stay within your own 4 walls to save people having to listen to your foaming redneck gutter talk.

2 weeks ago*permalink

El Jeffe

Well the guy is an audio engineer. That means he is intellegent, tech minded and artistically sensitive so yeah not surprise he did a good job.

Next time give the camera to a person who takes only vertical photos and video with a phone.

3 months agopermalink

Tronhar

This reminds me of a demonstration we conducted back in the early 90's in the context of microcomputers and software training. In those days sale staff made money from the hardware and would give away the training to sell it. As a trainer I found this devaluation of skills extremely frustrating. To make our point we set up two data projectors, one attached to the latest PC fully spec'd with maximum RAM and the other to an older more modest unit. Both machine used the same applications and operating system. On the hi-spec machine we put a salesman who was all about the gear, on the other one of our trainers. They then produced a series of fairly standard documents and spreadsheets and we compared the time and quality of their work in real time. The trainer absolutely slaughtered the salesman.

Our point was, and mine still is, that it is all about the outcome, and the human elements is still the dominant factor in the quality of the result.

3 months ago*permalink

Tronhar

I might add that when PC's first came out everyone took training because there was no precedent, so they learned to use the software in a structured, effective manner. These days people are believed to know how to use this stuff so there is minimal training, yet their experience is usually not applicable to a business environment, and I find many users less capable than they were back then after training. As I watched someone painfully killing a document over a long period using a sophisticated word processor, it was like giving someone a hi-tech drill and watching them pound in nails with it...

3 months ago*permalink

KodaChrome25

Interesting experiment. But I think you would need to repeat this experiment many more times to draw valid conclusions.

3 months agopermalink

Marcus Stormwind

As someone playing around with photography and learning as I go, I just want to ask, what skills are they talking about exactly? His utilisation of available light? How to talk to the model and positioning her? Capturing those in between moments between poses? Knowing which aperture/shutter speed etc. to use? Is there anything else I'm missing?
Just asking because I'd like to know if there are other technical aspects of photography that I'm not aware of and can work on.

3 months agopermalink

You'll notice that most around here, particualarly the journalists, are tech nerds, not photographers anymore...and will be unable to answer that question for you.

3 months agopermalink

Andy Blanchard

Pretty much hit the nail on the head - they're mostly talking about the light and pose - things that come with a combination of practice, expertise, and natural talent. E.g. think about the shots in natural light from the window; even with the model in a set pose, there's a lot of options in how the angle of that pose in relation to the light defines areas of shadow, and then the angle of the photographer for the actual image. Also knowing what poses will work best for a given model, having, more confidence in directing the model, grabbing candids betwen shots, and so on.

There are also a lot of technical techniques you can use to achieve specific effects that an amateur might not be fully aware of beyond manipulating shutter & DoF. Just on lighting you've got backlighting, rim lighting, hair lighting, Rembrandt lighting..., modifiers like umbrellas, snoots, reflectors..., using/simulating classic lighting effects like film noir..., all of which can completely an image's tone.

3 months agopermalink

speculatrix

I remember being on the sidelines of a football (soccer) match and there was another parent with a Nikon D3xxx, and I nailed a shot of my son saving a goal. We were comparing photos after, and she commented maybe she should get a camera like mine.

sigh.

She simply had the camera on full auto, wasn't even using exposure compensation, let alone program shift.

Few of her pictures were accurately focussed, most had poor exposure (the weather was a mix of bright sunshine interspersed with dark clouds, so exposure was tricky) and she wasn't anticipating the actual timing of the kick, so missing the shot entirely.

All those things could have been overcome with her humble D3xxx, if she had only read and practised a beginners guide to photography!

3 months ago*permalink

tom graham

a photographer who worries about equipment is an amateur
a photographer who worries about money is a professional
a photographer who worries about light is a photographer

Tom

3 months agopermalink

Stanchung

i worry about all three. lol

3 months agopermalink

speculatrix

a photographer who only worries about looking cool with expensive gear is not a photographer, just a camera snob.

3 months agopermalink

Transformer

Why do so many enthusiats have scorn for photographers who happen to have the financial means to buy expensive gear? I started taking pictures and developing my own prints in a darkroom about 40 years ago on a stringshoe budget. I used to worry about my equipment because it limited me. I am more affluent now and own some excellent digital gear. I worry less because I can shoot better pics in poor light, crop without sacrificing too much definition, and Photoshop anything about the composition I do not like in post. My photography has impoved, dramatically. I like this confidence. For me, photography is much more enjoyable with the latest and greatest gear. Nor do I consider myself a snob. I'm a bit of a collector and appreciate fine equipment for what it is. Photography is not all about the light, the message, the story, the composition... Photography means different things to different people for different reasons. The journey can be equally as important as the destination.

3 months agopermalink

beatboxa

And a photographer who claims gear doesn't matter but owns anything more than a cell phone or point-and-shoot for photography is a hypocrite.

3 months agopermalink

Negative287

Yeah, don't get hung up on all this gear talk, you'll do just fine with a Fuji X body. 😁

3 months agopermalink

retr01976

There is very little difference in image quality between Canon's pro and consumer gear save for high ISO. Many pros carry Rebels as backups simply because the rendering is very close and overall operation is similar. I shot with both Canon FF and Rebels and barely noticed any difference outside of DOF. If you got the FF itch but don't want to spend the money get a rebel.

3 months agopermalink

Impulses

Seems to be much more about working with a model than knowing what to do either piece of kit. I could tell you all about the pros cons of either setup and what shots might be ideally suited for either but if you sit me in front of a model I'd probably waste her time and mine, just not in my wheelhouse!

3 months agopermalink

JensR

Weird choice of kit. "Amateur" kit has much better range of focal lengths, only drawback is less control over DOF. Now, give the "pro" kit a 24- or 28-70/2.8 and see how that works.

Or, you know, realise that an APS-C dSLR is still a pretty sweet piece of kit and give the professional photographer a compact zoom from 2010.

I'm sure the pro would get great photos even with substantially worse gear, but IMO that gear selection is not very helpful. But then, this article was for getting clicks, not to truly inform, so I guess mission accomplished.

3 months agopermalink

K E Hoffman

Gear matters for action shooting, it's all about focus. It also matters for DOV control cheap lenses limit you.
But a good photographer can adapt and for years sports photos were taken without ANY autofocus nor screens to check.
Not sure this video proved any of this, but I appreciate the attempt.

3 months agopermalink

Magnar W

We can do a lot with low end camera equipment, but it might be more fun to do the same with better gear! :-)

3 months agopermalink

tm8

Just wanted to note that while the 40mm pancake is cheap, it's actually a very good lens. It was actually the only lens I used on my 5D Mk II for a couple years. Great for walking around.

3 months agopermalink

EssexAsh

How do you know he had more skill than he let on. Maybe it was the gear making him better

3 months agopermalink

Toselli

I understand the spirit, but the execution is a bit unfair. First of all choosing to do portraits in good light, where resolution, low light capabilities, dynamic range and AF speed are not really important. Second choosing a 35mm for portrait? The 60 mm (40mm x 1.5) is a more natural perspective for portrait. What would have been the result making sport picture (maybe even indoors), the professional using a tamron 70-300 4.5-6.3 and the amateur something like a 400/2.8 with a set of multipliers?

3 months agopermalink

speculatrix

I agree. Also, send them out to take photos in poor light, e.g. a city at night, a night club or concert.

3 months agopermalink

Zalllon

I understand their point, but they completely went about this the wrong way. All they should've done is state, "here is the camera I bought for under $400 and here are the photos I was able to produce". That's all that was needed not the comparison to an average photographer with expensive gear. Silly approach.

What I would've done is got a Canon 5D classic off Kijiji, got a couple of the cheap lenses: 50 mm F1.8 and an old manual 24 to 70 mm F2.8 lens. Processed the raw files in the cheapest software available. It's still amazing the quality of photos that old camera takes, and I've seen them on Kijiji for under $350 Canadian dollars. 50mm F1.8 EF lens used for under $50 and manual 24-70 lens for under $100, with cheap $10 adapter to EF mount.

3 months agopermalink

Mister Joseph

With a beautiful model, my 5-year old kid can take great portraits using my Samsung phone VS a pro with all the gear and a non-interesting model lol

3 months agopermalink

TheWintermute

This plus perfect light.

3 months agopermalink

DFPanno

Their point should be taken but this is not the best illustration of it.

3 months agopermalink

Badbatz

It used to be that one needed talent, a 100 000 dollars worth of knowledge, and ten thousand dollars worth of equipment to do "pro" level work.
Nowadays only the equipment entry fee seems to be lower...

3 months agopermalink

Jim Salvas

I think they disadvantaged the amateur with that 35mm prime lens. It's not even close to what I'd choose in that setting. It forced him to either get too much background or a nasty close-up perspective.

3 months agopermalink

XeroJay

I would be more interested in seeing a similar comparison in a more dynamic setting, such as a wedding.

3 months agopermalink

jor23

Important to have a good model

3 months agopermalink

ovatab

pro with a flyswatter vs amateur with AK-47

... a draw

3 months agopermalink

thejohnnerparty

lol

3 months agopermalink

beatboxa

What was this supposed to convey? That a more expensive camera doesn't help one specifically in framing a better studio shot?

This had nothing to do with the features that most 'better' systems offer: things like autofocus speed, buffer performance, sharpness, tonality, dynamic range, noise performance, depth of field control, ergonomics & controls, build quality, etc.

It's sort of like comparing a basic car to a sports or luxury car--with the comparison being: "Can you get from 'point a' to 'point b' with either car, assuming flat pavement and no curves?"

The correct conclusion is not along the lines of 'Therefore, the equipment is irrelevant.'

3 months agopermalink

joel22484

Not quite how I saw the message. If someone sucks at photography, they shouldn't blame the gear (or putting it nicer, if someone wants to improve in their photography skills, they shouldn't automatically go to the most expensive gear available).
Taking your car example, it's like someone struggling to be a good driver, so instead of practicing with the cheap car they already have, they go out and buy an expensive car because it's they feel it is the gear's fault, not theirs.
This video reminds me of the video series pro photog with a cheap camera...or something like that.

3 months agopermalink

ric h

The purpose was to convey that you get more out of learning and having the experience shooting than relying on technology. A better car analogy would be, give an amateur a Porsche and a pro a Honda and who finishes the race first?

So, if you had another $1000 to spend, do you get a nicer camera or do you take photography lessons? The latter gives you more bang for the buck.

3 months agopermalink

beatboxa

I used the car analogy on purpose--the key was in the test.

I don't know if you followed the the car analogy I used: it wasn't a race because nothing about the test challenged the technical capabilities of the cars, just like nothing here challenged the technical capabilities of the cameras.

This is not like giving an amateur and Porsche & a pro a Honda and seeing who finishes the race first--it's more like seeing who can park the car in a straighter line. The Porsche's superior specs become less relevant in parking; but a race would have had more technical challenges and required more skill.

If the scenario was for both photographers to shoot fast moving subjects in challenging lighting with closer looks at comparisons, this test would make more sense, just as a race does.

Here's an example of a more challenging scenario they could have used:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uv0n52-ncmg

But that's not what happened here. They didn't really convey the point you want to see.

3 months ago*permalink

tektrader

I look at this differently, having excellent equipment means that any screwups cant be put down to the equipment holding me back. Its just me that sucks...

3 months agopermalink

fotopizza

As a professional, I like to state an observation regarding that (constant) discussion. First, just because someone accepts money for what he or she is doing, does not mean, he or she is not doing it with love or passion: Many people say: Amateurs are the better choice, they do the job out of love- accepting money were always something negative. That`s simply wrong. Another thought: I often observe, that amateurs are doing outstanding work- if they can choose the time, the subject, the outside & personal conditions under which they shoot. What makes clients choose pros though is, that a professional produces a maybe not outstanding, but a predictable outcome under any (!) set of conditions, regardless of: weather, time, gear, tight deadline, outside conditions, regardless of his own mood or state or safety, regardless of the often lacking motivation or support of the people he must work together with. Even in a worst case scenario, a good pro reliably delivers something "usable".

3 months agopermalink

You can be amateur and professional same time... I am.
Those ain't opposites.

3 months agopermalink

TheLoupe

I couldn't agree more. Consistency is a defining feature of professionalism. Professionals' quality of output in any field will vary (relative to each other and even relative to non-professionals); however the key difference between an amateur and a professional is indeed professionals' ability to reproduce or produce (for the first time*) similar results...reliably and repeatedly... in same and different situations in which they are qualified. *New professionals may not possess a slight advantage over non-professionals with many years experience, as new professionals (once qualified) probably have learned better practice, new tech, better processes, but may or may not have practical experience 'applying' their new knowledge at level of quality that rivals an experienced amateur's.

3 months agopermalink

Dr Blackjack

A great point, but why here? What's the context? It seems you are just beating down amateurs and possibly even scaring them away from the art...

3 months agopermalink

TheLoupe

DrBlackjack: I was encouraged by fotopizza's comment as it gives me a goal to strive for in my photography. I appreciated fotopizza's comment because it deepened discussion from the original article / youtube post. I imagine everyone might agree with the general conclusion of the article ("...a good photographer can usually make strong images, regardless of the camera used..."), but distinguishing between a professional and amateur may allow amateurs, like myself, to aspire to improve the consistency of what they produce... in my case I would like to achieve this type of consitency...with whatever gear I have, under any conditions. Thank you fotopizza, your post gave me something to reflect on and to strive for in my photography.

3 months ago*permalink

Classic mistake....

A professional means you get 51% of your income from the profession... Nothing to do with skills!

A amateur means you love it what you do, but you don't get paid. Usually you have high skill set when you are longer time amateur.

Both can gain skills, it is question how much time is put learning and what has been changes to learn by locations, time etc.

Semi-pro is one who get paid sometimes or it is the second profession (less than 50%).

3 months agopermalink

Toni Salmonelli

You nailed it.

3 months agopermalink

PieterB

Indeed you did. We have all seen both stellar, mediocre and bad pictures from both pros and amateurs. Some pros are excellent at doing business but shoot mediocres pictures. Some amateurs are excellent but won't make it their profession. And some pros are good at business and deliver stellar quality.
Being an amateur means only you are not making money from your pictures.

3 months ago*permalink

Yup.... in all honesty, a good amateur can have way more skills than a pro. In almost any area. Usually a professional will do better, know more tricks from their trade and have a better workflow, simply because they are engaged with their task more time.

3 months agopermalink

I think there can be an interpretations of semantics too. Amateur can mean in the right context someone who just dabbles and professional someone who explores in depth. I think both views can be used depending on context.

Like for example- amateur results or professional results usually refer to not so good work in the first, good work in the second.

Not saying the interpretation you used is wrong but it's not the only one.

3 months agopermalink

The interpretation that amateur is "bad" and professional is "skilled" is just plain wrong. The words do not even mean those!

Professional means person of profession and works up to profession requirements.
Amateur is borrowed from Latin amātor (“lover”), from amō (“to love”) and means that you have other interest than a money to the subject.

There are other words as well like "unprofessional" and it doesn't mean "non-skilled" (like by the logic above should dictate if professional means skilled) but that one doesn't act and work like a profession requires.

A professional can't have a personal opinions about the job doing, that is professionalism. Meaning you can't choose to whom you work or who gets you hired. But so easily a personal opinions and judgement comes to play and causes unprofessional behavior.

3 months agopermalink

No, it's not "plain wrong" - look the definition in the dictionary. Webster has both meanings actually for amateur (both I mentioned).

"one lacking in experience and competence in an art or science The people running that company are a bunch of amateurs. " - webster.

Same for professional though a bit perhaps more implied "characterized by or conforming to the technical or ethical standards of a profession"

This is used often to denote a certain level of standards contrasted with amateur- as I said- *in the right context*. I am certainly not disputing the other interpretation.

As for the etymology of the words- sure, but words change over time from their root, so it's hardly a fixed quantity. Otherwise we would be speaking Latin for that and we don't.

As for a professional not having personal opinions about their job- I have no idea where you go that. Whether you express those opinions...

3 months agopermalink

Whether you express those opinions or not is a different matter. And the prices you pay for doing so. But there are sure several professionals that have expressed their opinion about something job related. Same with "you can't chose who you work with" - again, it depends. I know of several jobs that the person to do the job declined to do the job for the client because the client could not agree, did not want to agree or made unreasonable claims for the establishment of the service contract. So that's not true either.

The very last sentence may certainly be true for some situations, but doesn't represent the universe of possibilities..

3 months agopermalink

If you are a professional, then you will do all the work for everyone regardless their race, age, religion or any other similar things.
If you do define your profession to be something else like you are a Christian priest, then it is normal that you don't wed Muslims or Hindus...
But if you are a butcher, then if you deny to butcher one client cows because you lost to him in card game... You ain't a professional.

If you will define in your work description what services you do apply, it is then your rights to do so as well. So if you want to work only on monday and friday, then you can do so! It is your business.

3 months agopermalink

Tommi K1... that has nothing to do with being a professional. Choosing who to work for in regards of their race or religion, granted, could be possibly a case of racism or discrimination. and while I think every person is entitled to their own choices, I prefer people that can see past those two very basic filters.

Regarding age... in the case of photography, there are many cases of professionals specializing in certain type of photography kids / babies, for example... some hair stylists do so too. I wouldn´t regard them as "less professionals" for narrowing their field of work to a certain age group.

3 months agopermalink

And for the "any other similar things" is too broad of a stroke to accept it bluntly. One can have a strong view on a certain subject, and choose not to work for a person who totally oppose these views, or goes against a certain set of values you have. I regard this as an underlying ethics which may be valuable in some cases... for example choosing not to do work for a publicly known bigot, or racist, could be among the lines of said choice (to give but one example). I would never regard a person as unprofessional for choosing to go with their convictions against an unethical client.

The choice to do a certain job or to refrain from it can be a statement by itself on occasion. And part of being a good professional could very well be knowing when to step down.

3 months ago*permalink

@matpan. I think you have misunderstood everything I wrote.

If you are a professional, you can always specilize to something very specific thing (oh dah!). But that doesn't mean you will reject then the customers based something else.

Like okay, someone speciality and business is to photograph a babies in sleeping positions etc by drugging them. It is their business. But then if they start to say "Oh, I don't shoot dark skinned babies" or "I will decide is your baby beautiful enough to be worth the time..." then they are not professionals.

Professionalism doesn't allow personal opinions. This is the whole core thing in the professionalism.

Like if you are laywer, it is job to do your best no matter of what, to represent the case. If your personal opinions comes to your way of you being professional, then you can withdraw basing it to personal conflict. And that is understandable. But professional means you try to put your personal opinions a side. It requires you notice those.

3 months ago*permalink

@Tommy
I guess you misunderstood me too, I did not say it would be professional to discriminate someone by their skin color or degree of beauty (I guess if you are strictly a fashion model photographer your clientele auto / filters itself in this regard tho). I was talking about denying service due to a conflict of ethics as in (your client is a racist, for example) Let´s poise an EXTREME and highly unlikely case. I have a photo studio, Kim Jung Il comes in, "would you take my picture?" (while it is arguably a great opportunity to photograph a public figure like him and is likely a bad example) I wouldn´t see as unprofessional a denial of service on the bases that you prefer not to work for a known genocide / murder / dictator.

3 months agopermalink

http://www.mydoorsign.com/blog/right-to-refuse-service-to-anyone/

@Tommi K1:
cont...

A state appointed lawyer may have the obligation to serve the most terrible of criminals, but such is the inherent nature of his position, since the criminal system must warrant a defence to every individual. But a private law firm can decline a client based on such basis. Still, the lawyer example is not quite comparable, since it plays too close to a civil right to a legal defence. Whereas a photographer, a baker, a hairdresser just provide "luxury" services, which in no way hinder any legal right. I such cases the principle that "the House reserves the right of admission (or refusal of service" applies.

The right of refusal of service, when it does not constitute discrimination against any protected class, is a right that any business owner and professional has.

you can read more about guidelines on this right here, there sure are more extensive sources on this:

3 months ago*permalink

And I stress once again my point. The liberty to make a political or ethical statement by declining (or sometimes accepting) to provide a service to a certain individual, is a right that any professional has, and I consider it a constituent part of his professional persona. Nothing wrong with denying to make a photoshoot of someone based on your complete disagreement with their ideas, as long as it is not outright discrimination. Is a right that I consider close to the freedom of speech, work speaks for itself sometimes.

3 months agopermalink

digilux

even my daughter could have made some nice pics with her iPhone in a setting like this.....the real challenge would have been: here's a space, a model, a background some gear and a (flash)light package, go ahead and put everything together and shoot!

3 months agopermalink

GodSpeaks

Indeed. That scenario would have separated a pro from an inexperienced amateur.

3 months agopermalink

Leonp

I addition you have talent.
Some time ago (it'll explain) I was a member of a University photography club. Some of the members knew everything ( ;-) ) about photography, but their pictures, urgh...
Then came a young chap; never held a camera; bought a Praktika (this is the explanation); shot his first B&W roll and showed it on our weekly tuesday eveving. They were just beautiful.

3 months agopermalink

Toni Salmonelli

I do not fully understand why photographers are offended when they got asked to give advice about gear. If one is interested in something and knows someone who has knowledge, he turns towards him for advice. Is that not normal?

What I understand though is that photographers are upset, if it shines through, that the one asking has an attention span of a child because he thinks there is no skill involved and one only needs the right gear to take good pictures.

3 months agopermalink

Colin Stuart

not exactly fair. it does prove a point sure, but this is in an all-white environment really, not too dark, nothing really in the background to be out-of-focus, and just stationary subjects. Allows for low ISO, plenty of time to nail focus, not really showing off any bokeh, etc.

The kit lens + rebel trying to keep up with fast moving things, dark environments, busier backgrounds etc... would be a pretty poor experience. The 40/2.8 isn't too bad at least.

3 months agopermalink