The Fujifilm XF 70-300 F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR is a long tele-zoom lens for X-mount cameras. How does it stack up for optical quality? Chris and Jordan put it to the test to find out.
There was one question in the video that doesn't get out of my mind: comparing the 55-200 and the 70-300 - why should you take the 55-200 when the price is roughly the same. Well - in fact I already have the 55-200 and you all know: this is a truly superb lens concerning sharpness and image quality. But it is "only" 200 mm... And I am really interested in wildlife photography. Attached at my T3 the 55-200 brings high quality pics with a lot of image size croppable - what remains is often a nice picture. But anyway... I was determined to sell my 55-200 to get the 70-300. But: the extra 100mm will probably not enough for wildlife and in the sample pics here even I with my not the best eyes see that a TC eats up a lot. So I think I will keep the 55-200 and wait for the other third party lenses that are to come out this year - as far as I remember there are some longer lenses amongst them.
Another gem. Glib commentary, smart imagery, and the irrepressible Chris and Jordan.
I particularly enjoyed the camera-as-ping-pong-paddle clip, but wish it could be compared to Bruce Lee's nunchucks-as-ping-pong-paddle episode on YouTube.
I dunno, it seems kind of soft to me and I’m not sure it’s really an upgrade over the 55-200, except for the range. I think considering you can get the 55-200 for $400 used, this is a hard sell at $800.
Really a concise and useful review, Chris. Oddly enough, the only thing I would mention is that 50-230 users might want to add this as their other zoom telephoto. Of the three long zooms, the 50-230 has the best bokeh (actually very good for a zoom), is small and light, but clearly isn't fast enough for many occasions, is not WR, and can't take a TC. Conversely, the 70-300 appears to be good at what the 50-230 lacks (especially reach, relative aperture speed, and TC capability) but will stay home when weight and bokeh concerns are an issue. Beyond that, lacking a real aperture ring with set markings is the biggest failing for the 70-300 (rationally, convenient body control is a far better design than a fake endlessly spinning aperture ring on the lens). Possibly the 55-200 gets a bit lost now as the neither fish-nor-fowl option with the least reach.
Actually I once compared the 55-200 to the 50-230 for portraits and was amazed at how much better the 55-200 rendered the picture, Same body same light, same subject, the 55-200 blew the 50-230 out of the water. Sidenote, my sister in law managed to break a mount on the 50-230, it's only plastic. Nice and lightweigth for traveling though. I'd be interested how the 70-300 compares here, from the photos it's hard to judge. Seems to be a much better travelling lense than the 100-400.
The 70-300 is a tempting replacement for my Fuji 55-200. When shooting birds and flowers there are enough times I'd appreciate the extra reach. On the other hand, giving up the 55-70 range at the short end is not painless. I shoot a fair number of shots in that range, and the 55-200 delivers great image quality down there. Reach-wise it pairs perfectly with the 16-55.
A good review and a very good and much needed lens for the Fuji line! The only thing missing from the review is a bit ore details on the IQ/AF loss by the use of teleconverters. I think this one may be the 2nd lens I will buy brand new instead of used :-)
For some reason I thought this was going to be offered at $999. That price while high, would have protected the sales of the 55-200mm. As an owner of that lens, I feel like I need to sell it ASAP to get any value back out of it.
Such is the way of modern cameras and electronics. A three year old X-H1 with grip is worth just over a third of what it was new. You just have to look at is the value you get from it being the photos you take, not the ROI of resale. I mean, not counting specialist collector gear such as Leica limited editions. (That's not meant as a sleight, just an observation as they tend to hold or go up in value).
Lots of owners seem to think like you in Germany. I saw lots of offers for the 55-200. A German dealer offered my 370 Euros for the 55-200 if I buy a new 70-300 . The price for the 55-200 dropped here to about 600 euros. I guess it will fall again when there are more lenses from Tamron and Sigma.
I know it isn't quite as sharp as a modern day camera, that that little K-01 is doing quite nicely overall. Jordan, great work! I know it's no Panasonic S1H, but maybe don't feel so bad about having to shoot the hip-to-hate-on-it Pentax which, from a company not known for its video chops, seems to be rising to the task as well as or better than a lot of similar era cameras from companies better known for video.
I'm curious how it happened that the K-01 was selected for the video shoot. The camera has some nice qualities for stills, but even my K-3 is miles ahead of it. Jordan did indeed coax the most out of it - luckily no serious tracking necessary. I'm keeping my K-01, but most likely it could end up getting an infrared conversion for more (still occasional) use. Pretty much I'm a Fuji guy now.
It was a dare, IIRC. The challenge was if the channel got up to 300K subscribers by Valentine's Day then Jordan had to shoot a camera picked by the crowd to be clowned, in this case the K-01. But the plucky Pentax is pullin' up tough.
And I'm sorry, but the Pentax's actual physical control dials and sturdy build is just exactly how much ergonomically worse than the dial-less, plasticky, button festooned, non-WR Sony everyone compares it to..?
thank you for great review. I'm trading this lens for my 55-200, I like extra reach in almost same size. 50-200 is great lens, sharpness is excellent if you get a good copy, I hope 70-300 will be same with every copy :)
They were probably confused by the recently reviewed Panasonic 70-300 specs which offers 0.5x max. magnification. Either that, or they multiplied by 1.5x to calculate the equivalent FF result.
I might be missing something here, but will a lens that projects a 0,5x magnified image on an APS-C sensor not project the same 0,5x magnified image on a FF sensor, too? That image will just fill less of the FF than of the APS-C frame (so, if anything, less, not more, "apparent" magnification in relation to sensor size), but shouldn't this be besides the point, as the APS-C lens will only be useful on an APS-C crop anyway?
@Anthony Mueller, indeed, the magnification factor is about physical dimensions, unrelated to the sensor size. However, the frame coverage is not the same, and the same magnification factor results in a larger image coverage on apsc (larger apparent magnification)
However, I believe the number is just a mistake due to the Panasonic 70-300 lens review they have been doing a few days back. Too many new 70-300 lenses for a single week ;-)
If the 16-80 travel zoom (24-120 equiv) isn't "decent" enough for you, then you need to look outside the "travel" category and look for higher quality like 16-55 F2.8.
I like the range on the 16-80, but the optical results are disappointing. The 16-55 is better, of course, but at a weight and price premium. Olympus 12-100 and Nikon 24-200 are my winners in that category, both great compromises of weight, features, price, and optical quality.
Ibd since you seem to have gathered some experience across brands, what are the qualities that most stand out to you about the Oly and Nikon travel lenses? We hear a lot about "can't cheat physics" in these forums but every now and then there are lenses that earn praise in spite of it. Where do you perceive the sweet spot is for travel - in favor of sharpness at a cost of CA or bokeh, or maybe F stop?
What i almost never read about in fuji telephoto reviews is low/lower light performance. And specifically does the ibis mitigate this telephoto issue to what extent? At what f/stop can i can a low light pic with Fuji ibis? /2.8? /4? /4.8? thks, j
Well. At what shutter speed are you comfortable hand holding a lens?
If you are comfortable hand holding a shot at 1/50, then IBIS will add about 5 stops to that. This means you will be able to hand hold 2/3rd of a second if my math is right :-)
If you meter a scene to 1/50 at F/2.8 then you can shoot at 2/3 at F/16 for a similar exposure. Again the exact math may be off but the point is add 5 stops of exposure time and close down the aperture by 5 stops to get the same overall exposure of your scene.
I appreciate your helpful reply. What i was getting at however was that i would like to hear from more Fuji users about how there real world low light shots come out using various zooms. I rarely hear much commentary about using fuji zooms in low light, as i assume most of their zooms (except for the very heavy 2.8's) are not made for low light. It would be nice to see Fuji make a light 2.8 or maybe even 3.5 zoom. j
The XF 55-200 is F3.5-4.8 and has lens IS that collaborate with IBIS but don't expect any miracles. I can comfortably hand hold at 1/30 or 1/15 at the long end. The F stop doesn't really matter for IBIS, what matters is focal length and shutter speed (and resolution if you're looking for pixel sharpness).
Drew, thanks. Can you get low light shots using built in lens and in body stabilization with that lens? With the in body ibis being pretty new to fiji, i have not heard about, nor have I seen many good low light examples of this. Low light able zooms seem to be a hole in the Fuji lens lineup. j
jl123, if you want good wider apertures, you have 8-16f2.8, 16-55 f2.8, 50-140f2.8. But you seem to want go cheap instead.
If you want go cheap you get all IS zooms. But you don't trust IS. You haven't found reviews on IS? Seriously?
Are you worried about stability, or image quality? Or you want shallow DoF of a landscape? ;-))
Anybody seriously worried about quality on their shots, especially in low light, should go prime in any brands. But something is telling me you are just trying to justify why you bought your camera, instead of a Fuji.
Hi, In the X system, lens IS and IBIS work in conjunction - i.e. if you shut one off, the other shuts off as well. As far as samples go, there's a weekly thread on the Fuji X forum, so you'll definitely find what you're looking for there.
As you said Fuji has standard f/2.8 zooms, which work great in low light, as far AF goes. As far as light transmission goes, (T-stop), Fuji's small 18-55 f/2.8-4 is actually brighter at the wide-end when compared to the 16-55, so there you go. It goes without saying that we'd all want light f/2.8 trinity zooms, but you can't beat physics, which means you're have to have substantial compromises on some front.
I'm a Fuji user and although I don't have this lens, I do have the much maligned 16-80. I guess I got a good copy, because zoomed out or in, you can see every leaf on every tree.. and as for the IBIS, I'm getting consistent half second handheld shots out of this and my X-H1.
Based on this review and images, the 70-300 is going to complete my two lens travel kit, for just under 4 lbs. 16-300 stabilized mm+Fuji film sims=I can live with that on my next trip!
It depends on the focal length and how low the light is, but you can get a feel for it by using any of your lenses. To simulate the long end of this zoom set it to f5.6 and subtract four stops from the ISO and/or SS and you will see how stabilization helps this zoom.
@DarnGoodPhotos then it sounds like I'll get a minimum of four stops real world IBIS from this lens, as the longer FLs become tougher to stabilize. I'm getting five stops out of the 16-80.
@jl123 Can you please point out to me the Tamron and Canon f/2.8 mirrorless lenses that cover the 8mm-140mm range, while retaining optimum sharpness, good AF performance and being lighter? If you're referring to their FF lenses, then I'm sorry to say it like this, but as much as they are a technical feat for FF users, they're also hardly relevant to the X system.
Thanks for the review and for including the teleconverters. I am thinking the 70-300mm with the 1.4tx gives you comparable reach and more versatility versus the 100-400mm. (Less pounds and dollars too)
It's a very attractive alternative if you can live with the effective aperture of that combo. For landscape photographers it would be a no brainer I think.
For bright light conditions it would also work for birds in flight. I was on vacation on a boat and my camera switched to electronic shutter because it was so bright, I could have stopped way down.
@BillMassNBPT, for birding, which is mostly early in the morning with not much light available, I already struggle with the 100-400 apertures. It forces me to push the ISO up to be able to shoot 1/1000 - 1/2000. Especially when I attach the 1.4 TC. So with this one it may be even worse. Depending on the location, even a 400mm can end up being short for the purpose.
The obvious advantage to this one is weight. Carrying the 100-400 when going uphill is good muscle training ;-) Sometimes I just cannot afford to carry the 100-400 on demanding routes, and then I regret not having a longer lens at hand.
I am also curious to know if this one could have an edge with focusing speed, due to the lower weight.
@Txoni, I have the 100-400mm and just bought the 1.4TC. I agree with your assessment. I love the 100-400mm but if you are going to be moving around a lot, the 70-300mm with the 1.4TC gives you the reach of the 100-400mm and a lighter load at the expense of a little less reach. I didn't think of the autofocus speed. The 70-300mm is slightly brighter than the 100-400 and the distance to the sensor from the end of the lens will be shorter.
@BillMassNBPT, be careful when comparing, because the 100-400 is actually brighter, at least on the long end. The 100-400 is actually f5.2 at 300mm, while the 70-300 is f5.6. The 100-400 is f 5.6 at 400mm. On the wide end The 70-300 is f4.0, but it may drop to 4.5 by the time it reaches 100mm. I haven't seen yet any review mentioning the aperture progress with focal length.
@Txoni. Good advice. I haven't seen a review yet that shows the aperture/focal length stats of the 70-300mm. Fortunately they should be pretty close to each other at a given focal length.
Alongside the announcement of the new GFX 100S and X-E4 cameras, Fujifilm released a trio of lenses. Click through to learn more about the new GF 80mm F1.7 and XF 70-300 F4-5.6, and the updated XF 27mm F2.8.
Fujifilm's latest XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 has been on the brand's roadmap for some time now, and we were pleased to finally get our hands on a shootable copy. It adds quite a bit of versatility to the potential tool kit of X-mount shooters, offering a 107-457mm (35mm equiv.) field-of-view.
Fujifilm has released the XF 28mm F2.8 R WR, which adds weather-sealing and an aperture ring to the original non-WR version The XF 70-300 F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR is lightweight, also weather-sealed and is claimed to offer up to 5.5 stops of shake reduction.
With dual processors, dual card slots and more, Nikon's Z7 Mark II is a more capable camera than its predecessor in every way. But we have a few remaining qualms: find out just what we make of the Z7 II.
First launched in early 2004 under the name Optics Pro, DxO rebranded its raw processor as PhotoLab back in 2017. The latest version is DxO PhotoLab 4, and if you're curious about what it does, and how it performs, click through to read our full review.
The Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 is the company's most portable full-frame stills/video hybrid camera. Read our in-depth review to see how it stacks up against the competition.
Nikon's new NX Studio software suite combines the company's previous ViewNX-i and CaptureNX-D applications into a single one-stop solution for editing Raw files from your Nikon digital camera. Find out more about its updates and enhancements in our review.
We're working hard to finish our full review of the new Sony a1, and we've just added our studio image quality analysis. Click through to see how the a1's newly-developed sensor performs.
Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media.
If you're looking for a high-quality camera, you don't need to spend a ton of cash, nor do you need to buy the latest and greatest new product on the market. In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that might be a bit older but still offer a lot of bang for the buck.
Whether you make a living out of taking professional portraits, or are the weekend warrior who knows their way around flashes and reflectors, you'll want a camera with high resolution, exceptional autofocus and a good selection of portrait prime lenses. Click through to see our picks.
What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best.
What’s the best camera costing over $2500? The best high-end camera costing more than $2000 should have plenty of resolution, exceptional build quality, good 4K video capture and top-notch autofocus for advanced and professional users. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing over $2500 and recommended the best.
With dual processors, dual card slots and more, Nikon's Z7 Mark II is a more capable camera than its predecessor in every way. But we have a few remaining qualms: find out just what we make of the Z7 II.
The new Primoplan 58mm F1.9 lens pays homage to its classic predecessor, but features an improved construction with better materials for an array of lens mounts.
First launched in early 2004 under the name Optics Pro, DxO rebranded its raw processor as PhotoLab back in 2017. The latest version is DxO PhotoLab 4, and if you're curious about what it does, and how it performs, click through to read our full review.
Modern cameras have some amazing features, but they're not always turned on by default. This week, Chris and Jordan share their recommended setup for two popular models: the Canon EOS R5 and R6.
In Myles Matsuno's 'We're the People' video series, Matsuno highlights different people. One of his subjects, Terry Fouche, is a photographer and pastor. Fouche loves building relationships with people, and it's inspiring to listen to him speak about his photography.
The update doesn't have a release timeframe, but Atomos and Sony are working together to add 12-bit ProRes RAW recording to the Ninja V monitor/recorder when used with the FX3 Cinema Line camera.
In the late 1980's, East German camera conglomerate Pentacon was all set to launch a high-end autofocus SLR called the Praktica BY60. But it never happened. Despite this, some of its technology and design live on...
OPPO launched its latest smartphone today, the Find X3 Pro. The new flagship phone features a pair of 50MP cameras that can capture one billion colors.
After announcing DaVinci Resolve 17 in November and fully releasing the final public build last month, Blackmagic Design has updated Resolve and Fusion to version 17.1. The new update adds native support for Apple's M1 Macs.
The kit doesn’t appear to be limited-edition in any sense, but it does pair the black D-Lux 7 camera with a hand grip, extra battery and paracord hand strap designed in collaboration with COOPH.
The Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 is the company's most portable full-frame stills/video hybrid camera. Read our in-depth review to see how it stacks up against the competition.
The Fujifilm GFX 100S packs an image-stabilized 100MP medium format sensor into a body about the size a typical full-frame camera. It delivers great image quality in a walk around camera, and also includes a new film simulation: Nostalgic neg.
After months of beta testing, Adobe has released the first public version of Photoshop for Apple M1 computers. Further, a new Super Resolution feature is included in the latest version of Adobe Camera Raw. Super Resolution quadruples the total pixel count of your images using machine learning.
Tracking shots are difficult to pull off but filmmaker Jay Byrd Christensen accomplished one with a Cinewhoop drone. Watch the exhilarating 'Right Up Our Alley' video featuring FPV footage of Bryant Lake Bowl & Theater in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
One of the most common questions Chris and Jordan get from viewers is, "What camera would you buy under $1000?" This week, they shop with their own money and give us the answers. The results may surprise you.
Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo has bumped back his estimation by a year, saying Apple will put its first true optical zoom camera module inside its 2023 iPhone lineup.
Following confirmation last week that it was working on a professional mirrorless Z-series camera, Nikon has officially announced the development of the Z9. Click through for more information.
Insta360 today launched GO 2, its new tiny action camera. Including many of the same features as its other action cameras, Insta360's GO 2 weighs only 27 grams.
The drop in price comes at the cost of losing DRAM, but Samsung promises 'identical' performance to other DRAM-equipped SSDs thanks to the use of Host Memory Buffer.
We're still working through our full range of tests on the new Sony a1, but with the lab portion complete, we've discovered that despite its extra resolution, the a1's sensor displays a marked improvement over the first-generation full-frame stacked CMOS seen in the a9 and a9 II.
The new ECM-W2BT is a wireless microphone transmitter and receiver that makes it possible to record audio directly in-camera without the need for external cables.
The first major update to Capture One 21 is available now. The update adds new features, improved functions, additional camera and lens support and squashes bugs.
Vecnos’ IQUISPIN app has received an update that makes it easier to browse through and share their 360-degree photos and videos, regardless of what camera they were shot with.
Tamron's 70-300 F4.5-6.3 is among the smallest and lightest full-frame telephoto zooms for Sony mirrorless E-mount. And priced at around $500, this lens provides good sharpness and focal length versatility for the buck. Jump into our sample gallery to see its optical quality yourself.
The IMX661 is a new 127.68MP ‘large format’ sensor from Sony that features a global shutter. Unfortunately, it seems it’s destined for industrial use-cases.
Japan Camera Hunter recently visited the Nikon Museum at Nikon's headquarters in Tokyo. The museum, opened in 2017, showcases Nikon's 100-plus years of history and includes many interesting exhibits for photographers.
OnePlus has announced a three-year partnership with Hasselblad that will see the pair ‘co-develop the next generation of smartphone camera systems’ inside OnePlus’ mobile devices.
Nikon says its professional mirrorless camera will use a Stacked CMOS sensor. We look at why this one statement holds so much promise for the camera's performance.
Comments