The boys from Calgary are on a quest to find the best camera under $500 in 2021. Does such a beast still exist? This episode may reveal as much about the state of the camera market as it does about Chris and Jordan's personal gear preferences.
Used has two ways I would love to see it go: a) the entry point for those who would like to learn: solid body, solid lenses with trinity ranges (1000-1200 USD=)or b) reliving classics (bodies, lenses) for those with experience. I cant give you a price on classics though. For me it would be an F6 with a 28mm and 50mm prime. Is that..2k?
This would require buying used currently to meet the $500 limit, but Instead of the FZ300 with a tiny sensor (1/2.3''), I'd recommend the Lumix FZ1000 (first gen mk1, not the very pricey mk2). Currently at new prices, it is nearly $700 which is ridiculous, considering I bought mine in 2014 for less than $400 on Amazon as a 1 day deal (normally around $500) at Christmastime. It has a 1" sensor with a quality F2,8 across the range lens, 25-400 zoom, easy to access manual controls, EVF and articulated screen. IQ is every bit as good as my M43 Oly OMD 10 mk2 with kit lens, maybe better. I don't understand why older cameras like this go up in price so often, compared to when they were recently introduced. Madness. Who pays these prices?
Should have included the Sony A5100 & A6000. It still smokes a majority of every camera on this list. Not in terms of video, but definitely in photography. Even in 2021, way ahead of the competition. With the money saved, the buyer could have also splurged and upgraded from the kit lens.
Sony NEX F3 (used, shutter count - 850) - 100$, 18-55 - 100$, Konica / NEX adapter and 2 legacy prime 28mm and 50mm lenses - 100$. 200$ left for tripod, card, light or software... Not so bad, i think. Enjoying photography very much.
How 'bout Best Camera Under $350 compris? Olympus E-M5i with Olympus grip for ~~~ $175. Then lens? Pick it from wide range of M43 choices. My current fave -- Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 used for under $150.
Used market: Oly EM 10.3 with 14-42 EZ lens and 40-150 f4. Grand total $450! You get IBIS, 4k video, Live Composite. Insane value. With EZ lens it's about the size of a point and shoot. Put it in a jacket pocket and take it anywhere.
I honestly have to say that this video seems either uninformed and/or even sponsored. T7 sucks, you could get far better cameras (even new) for that price. 9 focus points, no AF in video, 3fps in burst. Also, that kit lens 18-55 has got to be the worst lens I have ever used in my life. For that money one could get a way better MFT lens such as 12-32 Lumix and a body with IBIS, 10fps, 4K with AF ofc, waaay more AF points such as GX80 or E-M10II (1080p though).
I agree. The T7 was garbage. The image quality wasn't even any better than the T3. A camera at a fraction of the cost. It's also far (far) behind the Sony A5100. A camera nearly half the cost. Not to mention the fact that the camera industry is moving further into mirrorless and away from DSLR's.
I was going to ask why there was no mention of m43, even Panasonic m43, but I realized that the low end there starts at about $550. I'd rather save up another fifty bucks and get the E-PL10 versus a Rebel T7, not the least of why is that it shoots 4K video.
I bought Oly M10-2 kit for $240. It's used but absolutely new. Also I bought a bunch of fast M42 lenses for $20..$50 and a $80 Chinese speedbooster. Would buy the same again if needed.
For that price I'd buy used every time. Buy from a reputable dealer that offers a guarantee and you'll get far better value for money which will really open up your choices in that price range.
Oly Em1.2 body can be had now for $560 used. You can pair that with almost any PRO lens. Or get 2-3 quality non-pro lenses. Oly 12-40 + Pana 100-300. Great kit for $1500.
Depending on what one is looking to accomplish, even a $500 may be better than a smartphone. For example, to get "real" bokeh you're better off using a lens that will give you true bokeh versus software-simulated bokeh. So for some tasks, the Pixel (or an iPhone) may not be the best choice.
And, if you're looking to get into photography, then a sub $500 camera is a great way to get started. Somewhat harder to learn about the basics of photography with a smartphone.
Depends on what you mean by "better". The pictures produced by the Pixel and the vast majority of smartphones are flat, oversaturated, oversharoened and the lens is usually awful.
Of course better is subjective, but at least from the learning side of things, it's far easier to get a handle on the concepts with digital camera than a smartphone, which is probably the more important argument for the camera.
@Petak what the hell are you going on about? Pixel destroys iPhone anytime. This is surely the first time I hear that Pixel makes oversaturated and oversharpened images, at least in comparison to iPhone. How can a picture look flat and oversaturated at the same time o.O? God you iSheep are incredible.
Pixel has a 26mm focal length. What are you going to do with anything requiring 50mm+? Show me your shots of perched birds, or deer in the forest, using your smartphone...
What are you going to do with anything requiring 50mm+ i am ok with IQ of 2x digital zoom. if i got a pixel 6 pro, than i got 104mm, with digital get to 208mm. real weak point is the ultrawide, i don't do much zoom anyway
flat and oversaturated can be at the same time, flat mean HDR like, oversaturate is for color. but pixel is the only phone that let one control highlight/shadow pre-capture. Color can somewhat change pre-capture with color temperature
Get the Oly TG6. I have the TG4 and I am still using it as it punches way above its weight. Very often, my TG4 could do a lot of things other cameras can't. From some landscape shots to shooting a menu page in a restaurant or a flower or a plate of food or some playful shots under a waterfall or just shoot some candid shots in the rain. It never fails. Actually, it is also best for street photography as no one bothers about you with that camera. Then, you can easily put it in your pocket with a small plastic bag just to keep it clean and from scratches.
The photos are sharp enough for an A3 print anytime.
Then, if you want a camera with a bigger sensor, go for the Canon M100 which is now very much cheaper and get one or two TTArtisan 17mm f/1.4 and the 35mm f/1.4 lenses. And if you can stretch it , get the TTArtisan 50mm f/1.2 lens too. Don't worry about manual focus. In fact it is better in low light as it does not hunt.
Ah yes TG among my scuba diver community photographer they call it "The camera of cheater" Cheap small and capable
For M 100 I don't recommend getting artisan lens, i got one and that's the worst purchase in my life, not better than smartphone during daylight
Pancake 22 f2 macro is better, can fit to jeans attached to body and amazing sharp and nice contrast, also can shoot macro , at f2.8 it as sharp as L lens
Agree about the TG-6. Just so much fun and the Microscope modes are unrivaled for a $300. f/2 point and shoot. I got mine for a bargain from the Oly outlet store. Great EDC (every day camera.)
DSLRs would make a lot of sense for a lot of people. For photography only, the Pentax K-70 is very comparable to a Fuji X-T4, and it costs you $1K less.
I thought cameras like the FZ300 with 12.1 Megapixel, 1/2.3-Inch Sensors were pretty much obsolete by now? I guess if you need a 25-600 mm zoom, it's serviceable. :/
As for the Rebel T7, most new cell phones match or beat it in IQ with it's 18-55 kit lens, and are a lot smaller/lighter and always with you. How is the video on it, 4K? ;)
Any entry level DSLR (APSC sized sensor) , some can be had on sale for as low as $399 new clearance if you look around with their 18-55 kit lens, way better picture quality than any smartphone, when viewed on larger screens, bigger prints, etc.
I only shoot Point and Shoot cameras/Bridge Cameras. The images from my fuji models are much better than what comes from my Iphone 11. Not even close. iPhones are for tiktok and instagram. Real cameras are for photography.
Buy 500 dollars Olympus TG 6 and spend another 1000 dollars for strobe and housing, you're good to go to get award winning images, or diving less than 10 m you can bring only the camera while skin diving without housing
Try going down there with fullframe, at least 8000 spend, and ridiculous as f to set up , can't even swap lens Don there
You can start shooting 600 mm with evenven 300 bucks, while milc you need 600 for lens only, and that's fixed RF 600mm f11, body another 999 for Eos RP, that's about 3 fold!
The FZ330 is not obsolete. It takes amazing photos that, with a bit of editing, can match more expensive cameras. Its also much smaller than any ILC with the same zoom; allowing you to take more photos than you would have. There's also the added benefit of not having to spend hundreds on a decent zoom lens.
Video for <$500: A key feature of the GoProHero 10 was unmentioned: its stabilization. You can walk and run and skate and bicycle with this camera while shooting. You cannot do that with any camera nearly as smoothly - IBIS or OIS does not compare. And Hypersmooth is better than a 3-axis gimbal, because it is more than 3-axis (no up and down motion, for example). And you have choices of FOV, given that you can work with 5.3K resolution, you can crop to 4K to get less wide.
The FZ300 is a good choice. Small sensor, but an excellent lens with a good processor and even a modicum of weather protection. I have had mine since they were released and like it a lot. OTOH, if you are looking for an ILC, a good place to watch is the refurb section of the CanonUSA store. They often have very compelling deals on entry level camera gear. Current M50 deals are well inside the $500 threshold set in the article and in my experience, everything there is essentially new with a full Canon warranty. You just don't get the pretty printed box.
I recently bought a T7 for travel and as a second camera to my RP. I am pretty happy with it. Size is perfect. I am not going to mount one of my tilt shift lenses on it or a heavy telephoto but it does a good job and I still like OVFs, even the small one on the T7. I consider it appropriate technology for the task at hand. It has drawbacks but I am satisfied with it. Cost me $270 used in excellent condition, probably would cost $230 in average condition. I consider that a decent value proposition.
What about the Panasonic GX80 with 12-32 mm , great little camera with many useful features. The 12-32 is a very good lens and the whole thing is small. Use mine alongside my G9. For an interchangeable lens camera worth a look.
The Panasonic GX80 (GX85 in the US) is a good choice, it's a full-featured but still compact and lightweight camera. It's also listed at Glazer's at $599.99 for the double-zoom kit with the 12-32 and the 45-150 lens, which is just an excellent offer. Selling the latter, you would even be able to stay below $500.
(Personally, though, I've sold the GX80 I once owned, because its viewfinder just didn't go with my varifocals.)
I bought my kit for less than that price 3 years ago. I forgot to bring a camera for a work trip, that ended up having enough free time to zip to Yosemite, and found it on sale at a chain store in CA. I thought the 12-32 was horrible optically though and sold it later, keeping the 45-150 which I find decent. The kit is good value when it is on sale.
I more or less bought the 12-32 just for fun, to see what it might be good for, and it actually made me finally sell my old Four Thirds Olympus 11-22mm f/2.8-3.5 (which I had kept because I just couldn't decide which MFT wide zoom to buy) after the 12-32 turned out to be substantially better within the overlapping range.
I would agree, though, that it gets a bit weaker at the "long" end.
(In the meantime, by the way, the Pana/Leica 10-25mm f/1.7 has finally become the solution in my quest for a MFT wide zoom...)
To get the most out of a GX85 you need a very good lens. Its smaller sensor is a bit of a challenge compared to the larger APS-C sensor of the Canon T7.
The Canon does not have IBIS and you can use both Olympus and Panasonic lens + others. in real world use (not pixel peeping), results can be very good. I use Canon full frame and other formats the Gx80/85 is an excellent choice under 500.
Another good option is to look for 'last year's model' on closeout. Back in 2011, I bough an Olympus E-PL1, my first mirrorless ILC digital camera. That little guy went everywhere with me-STP, sledding, a trip to France with both mountain and road biking.. and the pictures still hold up to modern day scrutiny if the light was even sorta decent. The camera and its kit zoom cost me $279 at a chain store.
I have bought and tested here for 21 years. Fuji 604z was the first camera I bought here. The cameras/lenses are nicer than their condition rating says. An A/B condition is essentially flawless.
Steve for newer items I can buy new over the internet cheaper than the ridiculous used prices in Japan. The items you identified are probably bargains.
Steve for NEWER items (not the items you suggested but near new cameras) that I can buy new over the internet cheaper than the ridiculous used prices in Japan.
The items you identified are probably bargains. Probably means I didn't look but I trust your opinion.
But if they are new cameras at the same price as those very good used prices I just dont know which models you are thinking of. I forgot to mention they all have 6mo warranty which I have used once and was legit.
I also overstated the prices with USD to make it easier. Those are Yen prices after tax. So another 12% I guess less than USD.
I dont want you to prove something, I am just curious which new camera at 500$ is better than an 80D or D7200 or D610?
This is clearly, without watching, not a video about phones. If you had watched it though, literally just the first minute of it - you'd hear Chris talk about why a smartphone user might be interested in a camera.
References to smartphones are also made later in the (8 minute long) video, in regards to the price point (500USD).
All that said, I like my SE (2020) with its single, stabilized focal length. With Neuralcam it's good in the dark too. Its photos aren't too great for viewing full size on a large desktop screen but they look good on iPhones.
But ...this video is clearly not about smartphones.
You could get an OM-D E-M10 Mark II body only for $450 and then one of the many affordable m4/3 lenses separately. That's what I would do if I had $500 to spend and wanted a new body.
Or to be honest, I'd probably get a used OM-D EM1 for like $250 and a 25mm f1.8 Olympus lens on the used market.
The Panasonic 1" compact is pretty nice for this budget.
What did the a6100 go for when it was available? Like $600? That's probably what I would recommend to someone on a small budget, but it doesn't fit within this $500 target obviously.
M4/3 has some great budget options too, worse AF than the Sony, but you have many nice value lenses.
Things have certainly moved on since I bought my first two rebels back in 2012 and 2013. Back then I got a 600d plus 18-55mm IS II for £465 in 2012 and a 700d body only for £495 in 2013. Both cameras had £50 cashback too. I'm surprised there aren't any mirrorless options for less than £500 these days. You would have thought the lack of an OVF would have kept the price down.
Then again I recently got a used A7 MK 1 for £440 and a used 7D for £138. Both are still brilliant cameras. The original NEX-3 and NEX-5 cameras regularly come up for around £30 used these days and are brilliant if you are shooting with vintage lenses.
If you get used cameras from places that actually test them they are a brilliant deal. I wouldn't trust buying them from someone on eBay in case the cameras had broken buttons, dead pixels or a bent mount.
Truth is, it's a tough time for buying electronics because it's a tough time for building 'em. When parts are in short supply, higher-profit-margin devices get 'em, and prices on lower-end items bump up. There used to be multiple mirrorless cameras under $500... and I expect there will be again, but probably not for another year or more.
Anyway, none of the cameras are bad these days, so even a $160 Canon PowerShot ELPH 180 (which normally would have been under $120) delivers reasonable image quality and offers raw capture and has decent controls including Lua scripting if you use it with CHDK https://chdk.fandom.com/wiki/CHDK .
Using the latest software like the Topaz trio of Noise reduction, Sharpen and Gigapixel AI, among others of this ilk, I wonder how much better images from a <$200 camera these days would improve in post. Perhaps some fodder for a future DPR TV episode.
SteveAnderson: If all you want is pretty images, then a cell phone is a great tool to make them for you... and lots of people want that. If you're serious about the art of photography, then you want cameras that give more control and higher-quality raw image data. My primary camera these days is a Sony A7RII with lots of old manual lenses, so obviously I like control and a big sensor. However, you shouldn't underestimate what you can do with a lowly PowerShot and CHDK, because CHDK's Lua scripting gives a dimension of control few cameras have.
ProfHank, Yes for sure CHDK or MagicLantern are excellent. 5Dm2+Magic Lantern is excellent of course.
And yes of course a phone is exactly good enough for most people.
My post is for those of us who enjoy cameras and lenses and capturing as much of what we see as possible without AI. Some noise reduction is nice, but the less, the better.
Yes please to a used gear episode! Especially at this price point, I almost think it would be silly to buy new. There's a lot of lightly-used gear out there, and as long as you can live with being a generation or so behind the curve, your money will go much farther in the used market. Since the stuff in this video is at least two generations old, I feel like that's a good way to go. In fact, I'd say that unless you've got over two grand to spend on a body you will probably do better buying used.
In light of how good cameras have been for the past 5+ generations, I can't think of any convincing reason to purchase a new camera over used in this budget price range. I'm looking forward to the next installment that addresses the used market choices.
By sales volume, Canon knows what they're doing. Although when it comes to kit lenses, the Nikons seem a bit better. Not that anyone buying a $500 camera will see, or even notice much of a difference.
Would have been more interesting to include used or refurbished gear. That would be more challenging because the options would be a hundredfold but it would be more revealing of C&J's tastes and therefore personalities.
Supply-chain shortage price hikes make this an awkward video. The market is all over the place. Pre pandemic, you could wait a couple months and find great deals for good MILC kits under $500 easily. APS-C X-T100, X-T200, EOS M50; MFT GX85 (2 lenses), OM-D E-M10ii or iii. Couple years ago these were recent releases with moderately current tech. Today we're between sensor generations. The cameras named are getting older but not cheaper. Definitely buy used like everybody else here is saying. On a shoestring budget, I would get a previous-gen 20-24MP mirrorless body with a kit AF lens and add a smattering of manual focus lenses, which can be very fun and won't make you miss eye-AF because you're not using your camera's aging AF feature anyway. The modern kit will do well for wider shots, and the manual lenses will give you gorgeous portraits. A cheapo mirrorslapper without AF adjust won't help you get sharp images no matter if it's AF or manual focus.
The under $500 test is very difficult, I think you have to go used if you're doing that. Look at how much the playing field opens up if the goal was to stay under $750. Suddenly a bunch of good crop sensor cameras from Fuji, Panasonic, Olympus, and Sony are in play. Under $500 is just barely too low unless you're going with 1" sensors or smaller, pocket and bridge cameras. The ILC market doesn't really seem to open up until just over $500.
Nikon d3500 Im amazed at how good the image quality from this plastic fantastic is, even the twin kit lenses punch way above their price point. Blows the t7 and t100 Canon rebels away in raw image quality
It's like i said. But people bashed the past 2 years for it, and back into the day, you could get this double VR AF-P kit, with a nikon bag and also 32GB memory card for just around 450-470 EUR into germany - all complete, and what's more, it was also Paint Shop Pro included, to jump start. For a beginner of photography, it was a steal.
Therefore, i posted the Links from Ming Thein before, already reviewed into 2019 by him. And it's true - if one can't make a nice picture with this DSLR, one can't with any other camera. Because the Sensor and albeit plasticky Lenses are excellent for it's class.
Agree. I use the Nikon D5600 w/18-55 VR and 70-300 VR. That combo is way beyond beginner. Nowadays, to me, a beginner camera is a cellphone camera. Some people buy a $4000 camera, but still take pictures like a beginner or not at all. Such a waste of gear.
I remember years ago I was shooting with an Olympus E-510, and a friend who admired my images wanted me to take her out and show her stuff about wildlife photography. I think I was using an Olympus 70-300 (a rebadged Sigma).
She had a D300 (a high-end body at the time) with an 18-200. She noted that she'd spent all her budget on that body and didn't have enough for lenses other than that one.
Ultimately the thing that held her back in wildlife photography had nothing to do with gear -- it was patience and fieldcraft. She didn't understand "we're gonna stand by this cactus for five minutes and watch this wren to see if it comes closer".
@nz Scott Normally id agree but those old rebels are awful, I believe the Canon T100 is called the 3000d here and it uses Canons ancient 18mp sensor. iso 400 is already showing blotchy color noise, I'd say its at least 3 stops worse iso performance compared to the Nikon D3500. The crazy thing is they are priced almost identically here.
@Hayden N - Canon does not have anything to compare to the Nikon D3500. The D3500 is a relatively new camera. The Canon Rebels were compared to the Nikon D5*00 series. The Rebel T7i was compared to the Nikon D5500. The Nikons have slightly better IQ and a better kit lens. The Canons have better handling and color.
@Nz Scott No evidence, Only my personal experience. A friend of mine brought a 3000d a couple years back and I was taken back by how much color noise there was in the shadows at iso 400. I never see blotchy color noise like that in my D3500, even iso 3200 is relatively clean. To be fair the 3 stops I quoted is probably a exaggeration for most situations and you wouldn't see that much difference unless you started pulling shadows or adjusting exposure in post processing. But i still stand by my claim that there is big difference in image quality between the 2 cameras.
@David610 - Enjoy you D5300! I like my D5500 so much that I am going to buy a second one. It is small enough that I can carry two bodies and the 4 BX lenses that I have in a relatively small bag. That camera has been on a lot of travels with me without any problems.
@MyReality I don't like to change lenses in the field. I started DSLR shooting with a D3100. I love the small size and my D780, and D610 have amazing quality but require more commitment for long trips.
I am surprised, TCS - The Camera Store wasn't being choosen for this, but i think, it's simply because that store mentioned into the video is more close to the DPR Studio into Seattle. ;) TCSTV back into the older days, before Chris & Jordan here was besides DigitalRev TV always a nice watch, and for the latter one, back into these days, Kai was being funny...somehow, unlike nowadays.
Hi, Chris and Jordan, Thanks once more for your video - it perfectly demonstrated the market shift towards more expensive gear. I think one step up in price (i.e. < 1,000 US$) might be much more interesting as excellent older cams often come down below this threshold. And, actually, you won't sacrifice much in image quality - although you might have to find the eye of your pet manually ... ;-) So below 1,000 US$ would be a very interesting price region for me - and through all sensor sizes starting from m4/3s.
Used Z6 could be found for like $1000. It's a best you could get at this category, along with used EOSR, which cost slightly higher. You can adapt ultracheap budget Canon/Nikon lenses via adapter with fully functional AF and that would be much better buy than any new budget camera.
Chris, you should have also looked at the FZ300 and then not worried about choosing more lenses. O.K. It has a small sensor but otherwise is very capable full featured camera which can produce excellent results.
Next cheapest is a6000 for $650 M50 for $650 XT 200 at 700
M100 at $350 unfortunately doesn't have evf
Nikon 3xxx unfortunately don't have wifi
So i think fair enough to give t7 as it check boxes It's not trap at all as you can use the ef mount lenses in any milc in the market, no wasted money if you change your mind
If I'm going to be a mathematician, I would definite go to find out what is (was) a slide rule. A film camera could be a good start, but buying films is out of consideration for a budget starter. A DSLR that has lasted for decades is an excellent choice for someone who could learn everything to do with techniques of photography.
@Alam12 - Just my opinion, of course, but the OVF in the T7 is unpleasant. And I'd be reluctant to explain to a new user how there will be no new lenses ever produced for the system they are buying into, but they can eventually "upgrade" by switching to a different system and then using an adapter - and adapters are not foolproof.
If I'm advising someone who is new to ILC - which seems the primary premise of this video - I'd really want to set them on the smoothest course forseeable.
Well, good to give them advice, but you also need to give each one who ask your advice at least 150 dollars.
Ovf may suck for some. But 500 dollars range milc don't have evf. Need to climb 750 for model that got one and that's 50% increase in price. Which money can buy you 3 things, a nice nifty fifty, a cheap tripod and a Chinese flash
I've used Canon adapters with EF lenses and my canon MILCs since canon started making MILCs and never had a single issue. Right now for a beginner EF lenses are a great option. They work with every single canon camera and there are adapters (some quite decent) for every single platform.
You can get a D610 & a 50mm prime, or a D700 with the 35-70mm F2.8D, or whatever range for the type of photos you want to do. If you're only doing stills then that's probably the best route.
They may not offer latest generation technology, but the Canon T7 and Nikon D3500 boast a price point that's tough to argue with. We think that the D3500 has a slight edge in this head-to-head comparison.
The Canon T7/2000D is about as affordable as DSLRs come – the 24MP camera goes for €470 with a kit lens in Europe and $500 in the US (from Canon directly only at the moment). See what this budget-friendly kit can do.
Canon's beginner-friendly DSLR just got an update, and now includes a higher resolution 24MP sensor, but the rest remains broadly familiar. It arrives in April with a 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 II kit lens for $550.
Fall weather has arrived here in Seattle, so what better time to head for the Valley Isle of Maui? The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 superzoom, which features an 25-600mm equiv. F2.8 lens and weather-sealed body, somehow found itself in a suitcase. You can see how it handled the tropical weather in our real-world sample gallery.
It's been quite the week, both in the world of camera technology and beyond... way beyond. We've been making steady progress on our full review of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV, Panasonic announced the first-even 20MP Micro Four Thirds camera, and us earthlings got our first good look at Pluto. Join us as we look back at a week of leaps and bounds. Read more
Topaz Labs' flagship app uses AI algorithms to make some complex image corrections really, really easy. But is there enough here to justify its rather steep price?
Panasonic has announced the Lumix DC-S5 II and DC-S5 IIX, a pair of 24MP full-frame mirrorless cameras with phase-detection autofocus. We've taken a close look at the S5 II and discuss what the more video-focused S5 IIX will bring.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.
A pro chimes in with his long-term impressions of DJI's Mavic 3. While there were ups and downs, filmmaker José Fransisco Salgado found that in his use of the drone, firmware updates have made it better with every passing month.
Landscape photography has a very different set of requirements from other types of photography. We pick the best options at three different price ranges.
AI is here to stay, so we must prepare ourselves for its many consequences. We can use AI to make our lives easier, but it's also possible to use AI technology for more nefarious purposes, such as making stealing photos a simple one-click endeavor.
This DIY project uses an Adafruit board and $40 worth of other components to create a light meter and metadata capture device for any film photography camera.
Scientists at the Green Bank Observatory in West Virginia have used a transmitter with 'less power than a microwave' to produce the highest resolution images of the moon ever captured from Earth.
The tiny cameras, which weigh just 1.4g, fit inside the padding of a driver's helmet, offering viewers at home an eye-level perspective as F1 cars race through the corners of the world's most exciting race tracks. In 2023, all drivers will be required to wear the cameras.
The new ultrafast prime for Nikon Z-mount cameras is a re-worked version of Cosina's existing Voigtländer 50mm F1 Aspherical lens for Leica M-mount cameras.
There are plenty of hybrid cameras on the market, but often a user needs to choose between photo- or video-centric models in terms of features. Jason Hendardy explains why he would want to see shutter angle and 32-bit float audio as added features in cameras that highlight both photo and video functionalities.
SkyFi's new Earth Observation service is now fully operational, allowing users to order custom high-resolution satellite imagery of any location on Earth using a network of more than 80 satellites.
In some parts of the world, winter brings picturesque icy and snowy scenes. However, your drone's performance will be compromised in cold weather. Here are some tips for performing safe flights during the chilliest time of the year.
The winners of the Ocean Art Photo Competition 2022 have been announced, showcasing incredible sea-neries (see what we did there?) from around the globe.
Venus Optics has announced a quartet of new anamorphic cine lenses for Super35 cameras, the Proteus 2x series. The 2x anamorphic lenses promise ease of use, accessibility and high-end performance for enthusiast and professional video applications.
We've shot the new Fujinon XF 56mm F1.2R WR lens against the original 56mm F1.2R, to check whether we should switch the lens we use for our studio test scene or maintain consistency.
Nature photographer Erez Marom continues his series about landscape composition by discussing the multifaceted role played by the sky in a landscape image.
The NONS SL660 is an Instax Square instant camera with an interchangeable lens design. It's made of CNC-milled aluminum alloy, has an SLR-style viewfinder, and retails for a $600. We've gone hands-on to see what it's like to shoot with.
Recently, DJI made Waypoints available for their Mavic 3 series of drones, bringing a formerly high-end feature to the masses. We'll look at what this flight mode is and why you should use it.
Astrophotographer Bray Falls was asked to help verify the discovery of the Andromeda Oxygen arc. He describes his process for verification, the equipment he used and where astronomers should point their telescopes next.
OM Digital Solutions has released firmware updates for the following cameras to add compatibility support for its new M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO lens: OM-D E-M1 Mark II, E-M1 Mark III, E-M5 Mark III, E-M1X, and OM-5.
Micro Four Thirds has 'size benefits, and a shooting experience that can’t be matched by a smartphone,' says the director of Panasonic's camera business, as we talked about the system's future, the role of video, the adoption of phase detection and the role his dog played in the development of the S5 II.
Today's modern cameras are armed with sophisticated autofocusing systems. They can focus anywhere in the frame, track multiple subjects, and switch on the fly. But what good are these advanced tools if you can't see where the camera is even focusing? It's time for the autofocus box to upgrade from its single-color status.
Topaz Labs' flagship app uses AI algorithms to make some complex image corrections really, really easy. But is there enough here to justify its rather steep price?
The Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 II is a powerful mid-range full-frame stills and video mirrorless camera that introduces on-sensor phase detection, 6K 'open gate' video, LUTs for still mode and more. We put the camera through its paces during a hands-on trial run in the real world.
The new FE Sony 20-70mm F4 G has an extremely versatile zoom range, but how do the pictures look? Check out these full resolution 60 megapixel captures!
Sony has confirmed it’s developing a high-end 300mm F2.8 telephoto lens for its E-mount camera systems. The lens will be a part of the company’s high-end G Master lens lineup.
Apple's new high-end M2 Pro and M2 Max chipsets are here and being debuted in the company's 14” and 16” MacBook Pro models. Meanwhile, its Mac Mini is now available with the company's M2 and M2 Pro chipsets.
Comments