The Canon Powershot Zoom is a product in a class of its own: part camera and part digital monocular. Can it successfully merge the two? Chris and Jordan show you how it works.
As an enthusiastic but amateur outdoor photographer, I carry a compact zoom camera (Lumix TS200) just for the zoom capability, the one thing smartphones are physically incapable of doing. And it comes in handy. So I'm definitely the target market for something like this, too bad the sample photos are discouraging.
I get your dismay at what you think are folks who think they are elite. I don't think that is as widespread as you think. I am running a challenge on the DX Forum and folks are posting entries shot with the D80, D100, and such. I shoot with a D610. So, I hope you don't think I am talking from a high horse here. I just think this camera is so far below even very old DSLRs or compacts as to not be of any interest for most folks here. Looks awful to me.
When my wife, my relatives and my friends are looking for a PS camera and ask my recommendation, this article is valuable. At least I can see a list of cameras from Canon brand and its production timeline so I can look up what camera is produced in the last 1-2 years and their specification.
I'd say from the IQ, my Oly 5050, Sony V1 looked much better, both with 5 MP only, back into the heyday. And this was Tech from 2002-2003. Pictures here from the samples looked washed out, fuzzy, unsharp, muted colors, etc...it looks mediocre.
I’ll buy it from woot when it inevitably goes there on discount. If sports arenas and concerts come back I can imagine this being great to use from the stands.
Make sure to clean that eye piece if you plan on sharing it. I guess that goes with anything else but this seems like you have to jam it in your eyes to get a good view.
Might also be good for plane spotters, both just to watch and to take an image. Much smaller than good binoculars or a conventional monocular, and of course much cheaper than stabilised versions of those.
$300? For this??? I am *really* not seeing the target audience for this. As was pointed out at the end, this is Not for photographers at all. But if you are walking around, looking at birds, and you think to yourself, "Hey, a crappy photo would be nice, to remind me of the pleasant day.", then sure, it would work. Till the battery dies, that is.
I would take this with my, along with my actual photography equipment, if Canon *paid* me three hundred bucks. If I had the chance to buy one for, say, $10, I'd still turn it down.
Interesting review, but this is NOT for photographers.
BUT this could work for birders, with some additions. Delete the card and add WiFi, so you can connect/send photos to your smartphone and save them there. AND add a swappable battery.
How would it work? Svarovski has introduced the "DG Monocular" that takes photos and sends them to your smartphone, where the Cornell Ornithology app "Merlin" can recognize the bird. 8x monocular and not a great camera. But it works.
The kicker? The Svarovski "DG Monocular" costs a bit over $2,000! So take the Canon, make some changes, charge $500 and you would have a winner for birders. It would be a great tool for beginning (and perhaps intermediate) birders helping them id birds and learn.
The Svarovski monocular also includes an app so that photos are automatically sent to your smart device. App is also works directly with Merlin. There are some YouTube videos demonstrating how it all works easily togther.
I was totally on board with this being a cool little smartphone companion, until I saw the photos. I'm pretty sure the Cybershot I had from 2003 has better image quality...
2003, i had the fine Sony DSC-V1, a metal body, 3x Carl Zeiss Zoom Compact Camera, 5 MP, it was great into it's heyday, only missing RAW back then, and very mediocre Battery Life, due to small battery capacity. IQ-wise, CAs have been visible, here & there...besides that, it was really nice. Later, i upgraded to the DSC-V3, 7 MP, same Features, but black, RAW Mode, same Laser AF Hologram and Night Shot Modes. And then came the R1, 2005.
Let's not forget about such cameras as the F-717! I'm sad to have lost mine to sensor failure, and the glue between the front to elements getting weird.
Definitely not something for me, although when the crowdfunding for this began, I had a passing interest: I have always had a slightly unusual Canon camera as a sidekick to my pro bodies - but sadly it seems that when I buy such thing, the product range dies (Epocha | PowerShot Pro90 | PowerShot Pro1 | PowerShot TX1 | PowerShot G3X)!
What leapt out at me was the fact that this device has the same launch price as the PowerShot TX1 (albeit that was way back in 2007). It shares the same 400mm equiv. max zoom but the PowerShot Zoom is volumetrically 10% larger!
The TX1 was genuinely a thing of beauty - brushed metal, a pop-out lens that hides behind a automatic metal cap; a continuous 39-399mm zoom; swivel screen (sadly no OVF). An updated TX1would be fantastic... yes, it would be for a niche market, but I'd get one!
thanks for introducing us to this type of camera; until today i had no idea that these monocular devices are a whole market unto themselves where more than a few brands compete.
This was a good review, but even better was the presentation. It moved at a good clip, and the narrative was articulate with a lot of word economy. (Example: talking about extra camera shake at 800mm: Crisp language of just a handful of words with no long rambling detour.) It got to the point, the pacing was good, and it was very engaging. Thanks for the review, but thanks also for the superb execution.
Would’ve been so cool if the optics were just a little bit better and the sensor slightly larger and the image processing was on the level of even cheap modern smartphones. From the samples it doesn’t really even look that good for animal ID, especially for small things with subtle distinguishing features like passerine birds.
I’d wager that a 2020 iPhone SE (single lens, single 12MP camera) held up to the eyepiece of a good optical monocular would exceed the image quality of this thing. The EVF is really all it has going for it.
I wonder if someone could put together a better version of this product with a raspberry pi camera, tele c-mount lens, EVF, and some kind of custom housing. Could probably get all the parts together for around the same price point.
How about just updating the Canon G3 X, Announced Jun 18, 2015 instead of this Junk. The Canon "REAL" superzoom with a 1"-type, 20MP BSI-CMOS sensor. That sensor, along with Canon's "OLD" DIGIC 6 processor, with an ISO range of 125-12800, an F2.8-5.6, and a 24-600mm equivalent lens. How about updating that Canon Powershot Zoom instead of this mess? It's been almost 5 years.
Chris; Your review is spot-on. One more annoyance is that the "device's" relationship with that microSD card is spotty. Ours complains regularly about a card not being loaded despite having a brand new SanDisk card in its mouth.
Your suggestion that this is essentially a good stabilized monoscope with a a kinda-camera facility is exactly right...and exactly why we bought ours. That is, we bought it as a very compact electronic pocketable telescope and that's essentially what Canon delivered...with some quirks.
I have to give Canon credit for actually making Chris struggle with finding something nice to say. You know how hard it is to get a Canadian to move off the "extreme niceness" setting? This is as close as I've seen in a while, even the Fuji 50 F:1.0 didn't leave him as flustered (although close). It's all in the "unsaid" - this video is a masterpiece of Canadian understatement if I have ever seen one!
Thank you for the review appreciate it. I'm legally blind and have used a monocular most of my life to see things. I also use photography to see things out of band. When I can't see something I'll take a picture and view it on my 55" monitor. This device has appeal to me enabling me to view and capture in the moment. Enabling out of band viewing. My camera and my phone fill that space right now. This could be very cool. I'd like to try it. The buy in isn't bad historically any visual aid is generally in the $1000 space. Great Review
Hmm, at first I thought it could be used to simulate different focal lengths with a stepless zoom (or with defined steps).
When hiking I often wish for something that fits my pocket which lets me see the scene with the focal lengths that I have in my backpack without unmounting the backpack, taking the camera out, maybe change the lens etc. before I can see the scene with the focal length I have in mind. It would be really nice to have such a small tool available in the pocket. I know that apps exist but often it's hard to read the smartphone display in bright sunlight and also it doesn't work well beyond 50mm FF equivalent because the image quality gets significantly worse while "zooming" in.
old universal turret-style hotshoe viewfinders can do this for you. you just flip the little wheel around to your chosen FOV and there you go. the one I've got has optics for 28mm, 35mm, 50mm, 85mm, and 135mm. the eye relief kinda sucks, so I was never able to effectively use it for composition on my old viewfinderless m43 cameras, but it'd probably work well enough for you for visualization.
In my opinion as someone who regularly identifies birds in the field and seen ~500 species of birds (a small number actually in the world of birding), I would be wary of using this device for ID purposes. I wish I could test it myself, but from the IQ seen here, it seems like it would make similar species identifications too ambiguous. There just doesn't seem to be enough detail for even casual birding.
i can distinguish only about 10 species of birds, would only be interested in this device if it had fully automatic AI animal identification - showing in EVF name of species, gender, age (chick / juvenile/ adult) of animal/s in view.
additional automatic AI-powered "mushroom identification" ( chanterelle, edible, yummy!) would be a very welcome feature too!
or "snake finder and ID" for geographies with a lot of poisonous and harmless snakes, etc.
mk. IV of the device should then be able to auto-find (similar to eye-detect), auto-ID and auto-describe any living thing - plant, animal, human ... eg neighbour, vivian, 28, blonde, single, sunbathing, tight pink Bikini, distance 200 yards, unaware.
Regarding the diopter, and this complaint is for most cameras including my Fujis, it is crazy to me that a control which you adjust once or rarely, can't be locked or pushed in so it's flush.
I think that's one of the things Sony nailed pretty well on their cameras. Most of them have it partially hidden behind the eyecup. It can be slightly difficult to turn, but as you said, it's something you really never adjust. If it's too difficult to turn, you can pop the eyecup off for easier access.
I think the Nikon Zs let you push it in to lock it, which seems like the smartest solution. But this zoom camera has the adjuster right where you grip it.
I don't quite follow the logic of this review. It was entirely framed from the perspective of photo enthusiasts rather than it's target market, then at the end Chris waives off the review he just spent 7 minutes giving using that same reasoning. A rare miss IMO.
This could be perfect for recce locations and shoot planning - if it had more usable zoom. Ideally from 16mm to 400mm. Then i'd buy one as it's sometimes a bind carrying heavy dslr and lenses around just on a recce.
I think if they made a few tweaks, this could be a really compelling little monocular - weather sealing, closer focus, smaller zoom steps, better battery.
Unlike other commenters here, I really don't think the image quality matters that much in a device like this. Sure it would be nice if it was a bit better, but I see it more as a way to just get a reasonable snap to help with identification, or to show others in your group who might struggle to aim binoculars (especially if they made playback easier). And the stabilization would help them use it too.
Or just use it as a memory jogger when you get home. If you're looking to create something for displaying, then this very clearly isn't aimed at you.
"I really don't think the image quality matters that much in a device like this. "
Not unless Gcam can be installed so you can squeeze a reasonable amount of image quality with optical zoom much better than what the smartphones are equipped with.
WARNING: Don't read it if you are easily offended!
My persional honest opinion: It is a gadget! A crappy piece of junk that feeds consumerism and doesn't serve any other purpose than selling you a device that nobody needs. However solely sold to you for the purpose of making money out of you.
This electronic device will soon end up on a pile of rubbish picking up dust.
If you really want to see birds, wildlife or anything over a long distance. Buy yourself a good optical binocular. Nothing beats true vision over an EVF. It will make more sense and a good pair of binoculars will give you more joy without having it end up on the junkyard.
Sure you can't take pictures with it. But what's more important?
A trofee in the form of a low resolution image you will never ever look at again... Or... The joy of seeing something remarkable real life and keeping it as a memory forever?
Sometimes a memory is better than an image. But that's just my opinion.
while you are right just think about how cheap EVFs and sensors are going to get in the future. 5yrs ago an EVF wouldve been too expensive to put in a device like that. In 5yrs time EVFs and sensors are probably so good and cheap that you dont need to spend big bugs on optical monoculars??
I've heard alot of people say things like "this looks better than real life" when looking through a good EVF (3.69MP .78x).
However if I want to watch wildlife on an LCD screen I better put on 'Love Nature' or National Geographic on my 8K 65" TV screen and have a show that gets me through all the seasons of the animals life in 60 minutes ;)
I was expecting something a lot nastier from a comment that began with a "non-PC" warning. There's no racism or anything like that here though, just an acknowledgement that Canon has made a piece of crap that nobody wants. Birders will get this as a stocking stuffer, try it a couple of times, and then throw it in the back of a drawer. If this carried some no-name brand coming straight from a factory in China through Amazon Marketplace, nobody would even be talking about it. That's the level of gadget this is.
i'd like to try this new Canon product just for the fun of it. But seriously i can see how a device like this could be cheaper and give more reach than an optical monocular. I'm not sure if EVF and senosors are already good/cheap enough, but its a first step.
Canon's latest PowerShot, simply called the 'Zoom,' is billed as a digital monocular for outdoorsy folks. It's also a camera, but that's frankly secondary to its main mission of getting you up-close and personal views of distant scenery.
The a7R V is the fifth iteration of Sony's high-end, high-res full-frame mirrorless camera. The new 60MP Mark IV, gains advanced AF, focus stacking and a new rear screen arrangement. We think it excels at stills.
Topaz Labs' flagship app uses AI algorithms to make some complex image corrections really, really easy. But is there enough here to justify its rather steep price?
Panasonic has announced the Lumix DC-S5 II and DC-S5 IIX, a pair of 24MP full-frame mirrorless cameras with phase-detection autofocus. We've taken a close look at the S5 II and discuss what the more video-focused S5 IIX will bring.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.
We've gone hands-on with Nikon's new 17-28mm F2.8 lens for its line of Z-mount cameras. Check out the sample gallery to see what kind of image quality it has to offer on a Nikon Z7 II.
The winning and finalist images from the annual Travel Photographer of the Year awards have been announced, showcasing incredible scenes from around the world. Check out the gallery to see which photographs took the top spots.
The a7R V is the fifth iteration of Sony's high-end, high-res full-frame mirrorless camera. The new 60MP Mark IV, gains advanced AF, focus stacking and a new rear screen arrangement. We think it excels at stills.
Using affordable Sony NP-F batteries and the Power Junkie V2 accessory, you can conveniently power your camera and accessories, whether they're made by Sony or not.
According to Japanese financial publication Nikkei, Sony has moved nearly all of its camera production out of China and into Thailand, citing geopolitical tensions and supply chain diversification.
A pro chimes in with his long-term impressions of DJI's Mavic 3. While there were ups and downs, filmmaker José Fransisco Salgado found that in his use of the drone, firmware updates have made it better with every passing month.
Landscape photography has a very different set of requirements from other types of photography. We pick the best options at three different price ranges.
AI is here to stay, so we must prepare ourselves for its many consequences. We can use AI to make our lives easier, but it's also possible to use AI technology for more nefarious purposes, such as making stealing photos a simple one-click endeavor.
This DIY project uses an Adafruit board and $40 worth of other components to create a light meter and metadata capture device for any film photography camera.
Scientists at the Green Bank Observatory in West Virginia have used a transmitter with 'less power than a microwave' to produce the highest resolution images of the moon ever captured from Earth.
The tiny cameras, which weigh just 1.4g, fit inside the padding of a driver's helmet, offering viewers at home an eye-level perspective as F1 cars race through the corners of the world's most exciting race tracks. In 2023, all drivers will be required to wear the cameras.
The new ultrafast prime for Nikon Z-mount cameras is a re-worked version of Cosina's existing Voigtländer 50mm F1 Aspherical lens for Leica M-mount cameras.
There are plenty of hybrid cameras on the market, but often a user needs to choose between photo- or video-centric models in terms of features. Jason Hendardy explains why he would want to see shutter angle and 32-bit float audio as added features in cameras that highlight both photo and video functionalities.
SkyFi's new Earth Observation service is now fully operational, allowing users to order custom high-resolution satellite imagery of any location on Earth using a network of more than 80 satellites.
In some parts of the world, winter brings picturesque icy and snowy scenes. However, your drone's performance will be compromised in cold weather. Here are some tips for performing safe flights during the chilliest time of the year.
The winners of the Ocean Art Photo Competition 2022 have been announced, showcasing incredible sea-neries (see what we did there?) from around the globe.
Venus Optics has announced a quartet of new anamorphic cine lenses for Super35 cameras, the Proteus 2x series. The 2x anamorphic lenses promise ease of use, accessibility and high-end performance for enthusiast and professional video applications.
We've shot the new Fujinon XF 56mm F1.2R WR lens against the original 56mm F1.2R, to check whether we should switch the lens we use for our studio test scene or maintain consistency.
Nature photographer Erez Marom continues his series about landscape composition by discussing the multifaceted role played by the sky in a landscape image.
The NONS SL660 is an Instax Square instant camera with an interchangeable lens design. It's made of CNC-milled aluminum alloy, has an SLR-style viewfinder, and retails for a $600. We've gone hands-on to see what it's like to shoot with.
Recently, DJI made Waypoints available for their Mavic 3 series of drones, bringing a formerly high-end feature to the masses. We'll look at what this flight mode is and why you should use it.
Astrophotographer Bray Falls was asked to help verify the discovery of the Andromeda Oxygen arc. He describes his process for verification, the equipment he used and where astronomers should point their telescopes next.
OM Digital Solutions has released firmware updates for the following cameras to add compatibility support for its new M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO lens: OM-D E-M1 Mark II, E-M1 Mark III, E-M5 Mark III, E-M1X, and OM-5.
Micro Four Thirds has 'size benefits, and a shooting experience that can’t be matched by a smartphone,' says the director of Panasonic's camera business, as we talked about the system's future, the role of video, the adoption of phase detection and the role his dog played in the development of the S5 II.
Comments