The Canon Powershot Zoom is a product in a class of its own: part camera and part digital monocular. Can it successfully merge the two? Chris and Jordan show you how it works.
A lot of people probably read the site but stay away from posting because most of the postings will be as usual for any small sensor device supercilious snooty venom that comes from the rich obsessives, with absolutely no interest in the actual equipment, but just indulging in an opportunity for a bit of spite from a superior viewpoint. Slap down £3,000 on the counter and you are an expert of course. Getting good images from 15 EV of dynamic range is much more a sign of skill than 12 EV in a small sensor. It is the camera and budget not the photographer more and more nowadays.
DPR is probably becoming more of an an elite club of users by the day but it is good that DPR are covering photography as a whole and I hope they do ignore all this nonsense and carry on.
I expect canon are crying all the way to the bank and are not phased at all by all this flack from people a million miles outside the target envelope for the product.
I get your dismay at what you think are folks who think they are elite. I don't think that is as widespread as you think. I am running a challenge on the DX Forum and folks are posting entries shot with the D80, D100, and such. I shoot with a D610. So, I hope you don't think I am talking from a high horse here. I just think this camera is so far below even very old DSLRs or compacts as to not be of any interest for most folks here. Looks awful to me.
When my wife, my relatives and my friends are looking for a PS camera and ask my recommendation, this article is valuable. At least I can see a list of cameras from Canon brand and its production timeline so I can look up what camera is produced in the last 1-2 years and their specification.
I'd say from the IQ, my Oly 5050, Sony V1 looked much better, both with 5 MP only, back into the heyday. And this was Tech from 2002-2003. Pictures here from the samples looked washed out, fuzzy, unsharp, muted colors, etc...it looks mediocre.
I’ll buy it from woot when it inevitably goes there on discount. If sports arenas and concerts come back I can imagine this being great to use from the stands.
Make sure to clean that eye piece if you plan on sharing it. I guess that goes with anything else but this seems like you have to jam it in your eyes to get a good view.
Might also be good for plane spotters, both just to watch and to take an image. Much smaller than good binoculars or a conventional monocular, and of course much cheaper than stabilised versions of those.
$300? For this??? I am *really* not seeing the target audience for this. As was pointed out at the end, this is Not for photographers at all. But if you are walking around, looking at birds, and you think to yourself, "Hey, a crappy photo would be nice, to remind me of the pleasant day.", then sure, it would work. Till the battery dies, that is.
I would take this with my, along with my actual photography equipment, if Canon *paid* me three hundred bucks. If I had the chance to buy one for, say, $10, I'd still turn it down.
Interesting review, but this is NOT for photographers.
BUT this could work for birders, with some additions. Delete the card and add WiFi, so you can connect/send photos to your smartphone and save them there. AND add a swappable battery.
How would it work? Svarovski has introduced the "DG Monocular" that takes photos and sends them to your smartphone, where the Cornell Ornithology app "Merlin" can recognize the bird. 8x monocular and not a great camera. But it works.
The kicker? The Svarovski "DG Monocular" costs a bit over $2,000! So take the Canon, make some changes, charge $500 and you would have a winner for birders. It would be a great tool for beginning (and perhaps intermediate) birders helping them id birds and learn.
The Svarovski monocular also includes an app so that photos are automatically sent to your smart device. App is also works directly with Merlin. There are some YouTube videos demonstrating how it all works easily togther.
I was totally on board with this being a cool little smartphone companion, until I saw the photos. I'm pretty sure the Cybershot I had from 2003 has better image quality...
2003, i had the fine Sony DSC-V1, a metal body, 3x Carl Zeiss Zoom Compact Camera, 5 MP, it was great into it's heyday, only missing RAW back then, and very mediocre Battery Life, due to small battery capacity. IQ-wise, CAs have been visible, here & there...besides that, it was really nice. Later, i upgraded to the DSC-V3, 7 MP, same Features, but black, RAW Mode, same Laser AF Hologram and Night Shot Modes. And then came the R1, 2005.
Let's not forget about such cameras as the F-717! I'm sad to have lost mine to sensor failure, and the glue between the front to elements getting weird.
Definitely not something for me, although when the crowdfunding for this began, I had a passing interest: I have always had a slightly unusual Canon camera as a sidekick to my pro bodies - but sadly it seems that when I buy such thing, the product range dies (Epocha | PowerShot Pro90 | PowerShot Pro1 | PowerShot TX1 | PowerShot G3X)!
What leapt out at me was the fact that this device has the same launch price as the PowerShot TX1 (albeit that was way back in 2007). It shares the same 400mm equiv. max zoom but the PowerShot Zoom is volumetrically 10% larger!
The TX1 was genuinely a thing of beauty - brushed metal, a pop-out lens that hides behind a automatic metal cap; a continuous 39-399mm zoom; swivel screen (sadly no OVF). An updated TX1would be fantastic... yes, it would be for a niche market, but I'd get one!
thanks for introducing us to this type of camera; until today i had no idea that these monocular devices are a whole market unto themselves where more than a few brands compete.
This was a good review, but even better was the presentation. It moved at a good clip, and the narrative was articulate with a lot of word economy. (Example: talking about extra camera shake at 800mm: Crisp language of just a handful of words with no long rambling detour.) It got to the point, the pacing was good, and it was very engaging. Thanks for the review, but thanks also for the superb execution.
Would’ve been so cool if the optics were just a little bit better and the sensor slightly larger and the image processing was on the level of even cheap modern smartphones. From the samples it doesn’t really even look that good for animal ID, especially for small things with subtle distinguishing features like passerine birds.
I’d wager that a 2020 iPhone SE (single lens, single 12MP camera) held up to the eyepiece of a good optical monocular would exceed the image quality of this thing. The EVF is really all it has going for it.
I wonder if someone could put together a better version of this product with a raspberry pi camera, tele c-mount lens, EVF, and some kind of custom housing. Could probably get all the parts together for around the same price point.
How about just updating the Canon G3 X, Announced Jun 18, 2015 instead of this Junk. The Canon "REAL" superzoom with a 1"-type, 20MP BSI-CMOS sensor. That sensor, along with Canon's "OLD" DIGIC 6 processor, with an ISO range of 125-12800, an F2.8-5.6, and a 24-600mm equivalent lens. How about updating that Canon Powershot Zoom instead of this mess? It's been almost 5 years.
Chris; Your review is spot-on. One more annoyance is that the "device's" relationship with that microSD card is spotty. Ours complains regularly about a card not being loaded despite having a brand new SanDisk card in its mouth.
Your suggestion that this is essentially a good stabilized monoscope with a a kinda-camera facility is exactly right...and exactly why we bought ours. That is, we bought it as a very compact electronic pocketable telescope and that's essentially what Canon delivered...with some quirks.
I have to give Canon credit for actually making Chris struggle with finding something nice to say. You know how hard it is to get a Canadian to move off the "extreme niceness" setting? This is as close as I've seen in a while, even the Fuji 50 F:1.0 didn't leave him as flustered (although close). It's all in the "unsaid" - this video is a masterpiece of Canadian understatement if I have ever seen one!
Thank you for the review appreciate it. I'm legally blind and have used a monocular most of my life to see things. I also use photography to see things out of band. When I can't see something I'll take a picture and view it on my 55" monitor. This device has appeal to me enabling me to view and capture in the moment. Enabling out of band viewing. My camera and my phone fill that space right now. This could be very cool. I'd like to try it. The buy in isn't bad historically any visual aid is generally in the $1000 space. Great Review
Hmm, at first I thought it could be used to simulate different focal lengths with a stepless zoom (or with defined steps).
When hiking I often wish for something that fits my pocket which lets me see the scene with the focal lengths that I have in my backpack without unmounting the backpack, taking the camera out, maybe change the lens etc. before I can see the scene with the focal length I have in mind. It would be really nice to have such a small tool available in the pocket. I know that apps exist but often it's hard to read the smartphone display in bright sunlight and also it doesn't work well beyond 50mm FF equivalent because the image quality gets significantly worse while "zooming" in.
old universal turret-style hotshoe viewfinders can do this for you. you just flip the little wheel around to your chosen FOV and there you go. the one I've got has optics for 28mm, 35mm, 50mm, 85mm, and 135mm. the eye relief kinda sucks, so I was never able to effectively use it for composition on my old viewfinderless m43 cameras, but it'd probably work well enough for you for visualization.
In my opinion as someone who regularly identifies birds in the field and seen ~500 species of birds (a small number actually in the world of birding), I would be wary of using this device for ID purposes. I wish I could test it myself, but from the IQ seen here, it seems like it would make similar species identifications too ambiguous. There just doesn't seem to be enough detail for even casual birding.
i can distinguish only about 10 species of birds, would only be interested in this device if it had fully automatic AI animal identification - showing in EVF name of species, gender, age (chick / juvenile/ adult) of animal/s in view.
additional automatic AI-powered "mushroom identification" ( chanterelle, edible, yummy!) would be a very welcome feature too!
or "snake finder and ID" for geographies with a lot of poisonous and harmless snakes, etc.
mk. IV of the device should then be able to auto-find (similar to eye-detect), auto-ID and auto-describe any living thing - plant, animal, human ... eg neighbour, vivian, 28, blonde, single, sunbathing, tight pink Bikini, distance 200 yards, unaware.
Regarding the diopter, and this complaint is for most cameras including my Fujis, it is crazy to me that a control which you adjust once or rarely, can't be locked or pushed in so it's flush.
I think that's one of the things Sony nailed pretty well on their cameras. Most of them have it partially hidden behind the eyecup. It can be slightly difficult to turn, but as you said, it's something you really never adjust. If it's too difficult to turn, you can pop the eyecup off for easier access.
I think the Nikon Zs let you push it in to lock it, which seems like the smartest solution. But this zoom camera has the adjuster right where you grip it.
I don't quite follow the logic of this review. It was entirely framed from the perspective of photo enthusiasts rather than it's target market, then at the end Chris waives off the review he just spent 7 minutes giving using that same reasoning. A rare miss IMO.
This could be perfect for recce locations and shoot planning - if it had more usable zoom. Ideally from 16mm to 400mm. Then i'd buy one as it's sometimes a bind carrying heavy dslr and lenses around just on a recce.
Probably better than the vitriol that will always result whenever a small sensor device like this, probably working well within its own parameters, features in a purist often money and size no object photography gear site.
@Mariano Always useful these insightful alternatives given to the product being reviewed.
Any particular lens you recommend for use with the R7 and any advice on a back pack would be useful.
With cars often there is an inverse ratio operating with the larger the cubic capacity of a car engine the smaller the apparent capacity of the brain operating it and sometimes you have to wonder when any smaller sensor review comes up if there is a similar situation in operation with the sensor size in a camera.
I think if they made a few tweaks, this could be a really compelling little monocular - weather sealing, closer focus, smaller zoom steps, better battery.
Unlike other commenters here, I really don't think the image quality matters that much in a device like this. Sure it would be nice if it was a bit better, but I see it more as a way to just get a reasonable snap to help with identification, or to show others in your group who might struggle to aim binoculars (especially if they made playback easier). And the stabilization would help them use it too.
Or just use it as a memory jogger when you get home. If you're looking to create something for displaying, then this very clearly isn't aimed at you.
"I really don't think the image quality matters that much in a device like this. "
Not unless Gcam can be installed so you can squeeze a reasonable amount of image quality with optical zoom much better than what the smartphones are equipped with.
WARNING: Don't read it if you are easily offended!
My persional honest opinion: It is a gadget! A crappy piece of junk that feeds consumerism and doesn't serve any other purpose than selling you a device that nobody needs. However solely sold to you for the purpose of making money out of you.
This electronic device will soon end up on a pile of rubbish picking up dust.
If you really want to see birds, wildlife or anything over a long distance. Buy yourself a good optical binocular. Nothing beats true vision over an EVF. It will make more sense and a good pair of binoculars will give you more joy without having it end up on the junkyard.
Sure you can't take pictures with it. But what's more important?
A trofee in the form of a low resolution image you will never ever look at again... Or... The joy of seeing something remarkable real life and keeping it as a memory forever?
Sometimes a memory is better than an image. But that's just my opinion.
while you are right just think about how cheap EVFs and sensors are going to get in the future. 5yrs ago an EVF wouldve been too expensive to put in a device like that. In 5yrs time EVFs and sensors are probably so good and cheap that you dont need to spend big bugs on optical monoculars??
I've heard alot of people say things like "this looks better than real life" when looking through a good EVF (3.69MP .78x).
However if I want to watch wildlife on an LCD screen I better put on 'Love Nature' or National Geographic on my 8K 65" TV screen and have a show that gets me through all the seasons of the animals life in 60 minutes ;)
I was expecting something a lot nastier from a comment that began with a "non-PC" warning. There's no racism or anything like that here though, just an acknowledgement that Canon has made a piece of crap that nobody wants. Birders will get this as a stocking stuffer, try it a couple of times, and then throw it in the back of a drawer. If this carried some no-name brand coming straight from a factory in China through Amazon Marketplace, nobody would even be talking about it. That's the level of gadget this is.
i'd like to try this new Canon product just for the fun of it. But seriously i can see how a device like this could be cheaper and give more reach than an optical monocular. I'm not sure if EVF and senosors are already good/cheap enough, but its a first step.
Canon's latest PowerShot, simply called the 'Zoom,' is billed as a digital monocular for outdoorsy folks. It's also a camera, but that's frankly secondary to its main mission of getting you up-close and personal views of distant scenery.
Fujifilm's 30mm F3.5 R WR is a super sharp 24mm-equivalent lens for the company's GFX lineup of digital medium-format cameras. Is it good enough to warrant a place in your camera bag? Find out in our field review.
The Insta360 One R is a unique action camera: it has interchangeable camera modules, including one with a large 1"-type sensor and a Leica lens. We show you how it works and ask, 'who's it for'?
Exposure X6 is the latest Adobe Lightroom competitor from Exposure Software. With great image quality, impressive speed and powerful features, it's a compelling option that doesn't require a monthly subscription.
Sigma's 35mm F2 DG DN designed specifically for mirrorless cameras is a compact, well-built lens that produces lovely images. Is it a good fit for you? Find out in our field review.
US manufacturer Really Right Stuff just released a new lightweight travel tripod, aimed at active and weight-conscious photographers that don't want to compromise on quality. Does its performance justify its high price? Find out in our initial review.
Whether you make a living out of taking professional portraits, or are the weekend warrior who knows their way around flashes and reflectors, you'll want a camera with high resolution, exceptional autofocus and a good selection of portrait prime lenses. Click through to see our picks.
What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best.
What’s the best camera costing over $2500? The best high-end camera costing more than $2000 should have plenty of resolution, exceptional build quality, good 4K video capture and top-notch autofocus for advanced and professional users. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing over $2500 and recommended the best.
What's the best camera for travel? Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional productions or A-camera for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
Tamron's 17-70mm F2.8 III-A VC RXD is a lightweight zoom for Sony APS-C E-mount shooters. Equivalent to a 25-105mm F4 in full-frame terms, this lens handles nicely on a6000-series cameras and offers great versatility for daylight shooting.
The Canon 200mm F1.8L may be over 30 years old, but the fact that it still keeps up with the newest high resolution sensors is a testament to its design. Featuring guest photographer Irene Rudnyk.
We teamed up with Canadian portrait photographer Irene Rudnyk to shoot a sample gallery with the legendary Canon 200mm F1.8L. Check out the photos and tell us what you think!
Is the SD card slot coming back to the MacBook Pro? Is the polarizing Touch Bar finally getting kicked to the curb? Bloomberg is reporting that there are many changes coming next-gen Mac computers and the changes all sound promising.
Today, B&W film photography remains popular both for its aesthetic appeal and its ease-of-use, whether you're a beginner, taking an intro to darkroom photography class or a seasoned pro. Here's everything you need to know about the medium.
The new limited edition Reporter version of the M10-P comes with a Kevlar jacket and a deep green paint — though you (probably) won't be taking it to war
Last year we covered PhotoStatistica, a macOS app that visualizes the EXIF data of your images and shows you the ways in which you capture photos. A new version was just released, introducing many improvements, including a new UI and new filtering tools.
Fujifilm's 30mm F3.5 R WR is a super sharp 24mm-equivalent lens for the company's GFX lineup of digital medium-format cameras. Is it good enough to warrant a place in your camera bag? Find out in our field review.
The next-generation AAT system can identify more objects in photos, perceive where each object is located relative to each other and provide more detailed descriptions.
US face recognition developer has been found to have used pictures from the Ever storage app without permission, and now has to delete all its algorithms.
Irix's new 45mm F1.4 Dragonfly lens is fully-manual and ready to be used with Fujifilm's GFX 50 and 100 camera systems. It's currently available to pre-order for $795.
The Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 is a fast, large aperture zoom for Sony E-mount APS-C cameras. Does it hit the sweet spot between price and performance for an everyday zoom lens? We tested it to find out.
If you're a Sony APS-C shooter in search of a versatile, walk-around zoom lens, the Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 should probably be on your short list. Check out our sample gallery and judge image quality for yourself.
Exploredinary has published a video tour of the Ilford photographic film and paper factory in Mobberley, England. The factory, operated by Harman Technology, which trades as Ilford Photo, has been operating on the same site since 1928. Ilford Photo traces its roots back to 1879.
Qualcomm has introduced its new Snapdragon 870 5G, a faster version of the aging 865 mobile platform that brings support for 200MP single cameras and 720p slow-motion recording at 960fps.
Is it really necessary to pay for photo editing software when it already comes included with your camera purchase? We test Nikon's own editing apps against the industry go-to.
The lens is optically identical to its black and silver siblings, but spices things up with a bright-red paint job and a custom lens cap to celebrate the Year of the Ox.
Join filmmaker John Webster and his team as they voyage into the beautiful Sawtooth Wilderness in Idaho with Manfrotto's Befree 3-way Live Advanced tripod.
The inclusion of in-body stabilization in Fujifilm's X-S10 means it's able to offer a lot of the features of the flagship X-T4. So, price aside, what are the differences between the two models, and how much of a bargain is the smaller camera?
Which high resolution mirrorless camera is best for you? This week, we compare the Canon EOS R5, Sony a7R IV, Nikon Z7 II and Panasonic S1R to answer that question.
As part of CES 2021, Canon launched a new website allowing users to view select locations on earth from the Canon CE-SAT-1 satellite. Using the onboard Canon 5D Mark III and Canon telescope, you can zoom in and see our planet from a fresh perspective.
Comments