Between 1978 and 1985 Pentax sold the Pentax Auto 110 (and later, the Auto 110 Super), a miniature SLR system built around Kodak's small-format 110 film cartridges. The 110 system is no longer with us, but thanks to an almost identical frame size, its lenses are a perfect match for the Micro Four Thirds system. Join us as we discover the joy of using vintage Pentax 110 lenses on a modern digital camera.
Thanks for the post ----- But Pentax 110 Lenses come with a high cost! +1+ Financial - they have proved to be "trendy" and the action prices have been rising. +2+ Useability - the lack of aperture control === Solution - for similar "small footprint" lenses for M4/3 - take a moment to look at the truely tiny lenses made by Cheecar/Fujian in c-mount: available in 25mm, 35mm and 50mm. They have advantages over the legacy Pentax 110 lenses while maintaning the Pentax benefits. = Advantage of the Fujian mini lenses: [1] Available new for £10-20 GBP / $15-30 USD with C to M4/3 adapters from many auction websites [2] in the perspectives 25mm, 35mm and 50mm [3] All have variable apertures [4] with faster F1.4 to F1.7 apertures than Pentax 110 [5] Are new build - so fungus, haze and dust are not a problem
My advice is to start with the 35mm Fujian F1.7 - and if in doubt, just google "35mm Fujian F1.7" for some reviews and inspiration on You Tube and beyond.
I have the full Pentax 110 kit and also a Pentax Q7 with three lenses. I got an adapter to use the 110 lenses with the Q (incidentally a very good camera considering the sensor size). The 110 and Q lenses are very good - what do you expect from a Pentax prime? So I disagree with your derogatory comments about the quality of these lenses. Old doesn't mean bad - I still use mainly Minolta lenses on my Sony A7.
I do like the landscapes, and how they are not overly sharp. They appear much like the eye sees -- an eye cannot be focused on close to infinity all at once. On the portraits the lack of sharpness is distracting.
I get similar effect using Russian Industar 50-2 (M42) with a Canon or Fujifilm adapter. M42 lenses are fun to play with, they are dirt cheap, and adapters are easy to get. They are not for everyday shooting, but they can give you just the right kind of vintage look with the je-ne-sais-quoi that is hard to fake.
Another idea for fun videos: if you switch to 35mm sensors, how about delving in the world of vintage Leica M39 screw mount lenses? It's still huge, and besides high quality products such as original Leica lenses there are a lot of funny cheap Sowjet lenses out there, some of which are surprisingly good and others are technically so bad that it is really fun to see the artistic results the can create.
Leica M39 (or even M mount) on a MFT like the Panasonic GX8 is "interesting". With a Viso adapter (to M Mount) and a M Mount to MFT adapter a Leica M39 400mm Telyt gives surprising results. The IBIS I think helps quite a bit and using a monopod or bean bag on a car door you can experiment with some pretty extreme distance wild-life shots. Most noticeable is the different colour rendering compared to say the Panasonic 14-140mm.
Great pictures. The sharpness or lack of doesn’t bother me at all. Not sure how much post if any has been done, but lack of sharpness and the color profile gives them real character. Looking at the shot of the fence in the snow or the blue corrugated surface with the flash of orange you’d be forgiven for thinking the images didn’t come from an Olympus m4/3. At a time where we complain if a camera can’t do everything brilliantly, it’s great to see what enforced limitations (and a sense of fun) can produce. As a kid I owned a Fuji 110 film camera. It was very plasticky, the rear door was really loose and....it took the best photos! My dad had the Agfa equivalent, an exquisitely made and designed object that just never delivered the same results as the cheap little Fuji.
Makes me wonder why all my M43 lenses are so 'big' when these tiny things cover almost the same image circle, and at f2.8! Yeah OK, no diaphragm, AF, or OIS, and pretty average optical performance, but still, the size difference to current M43 primes is a little startling, no?
Well, look at the M- Series Pentax 50mm f/1.4 vs. the latest 50mm f/1.4 Pentax offer. I suppose the difference in volume is comparable. I guess getting high quality wide open is a big factor. Besides, the 25mm and 18mm for Pentax 110 are kind of fiddly as soon as you want to control focus and/or aperture. Pocketability über alles, but personnally a don't mind a wee bit of ergonomics
They're not that much smaller than the f1.7/1.8 prime AF variable aperture m43 lenses. I guess a better comparison would be the Olympus body cap lenses. Those things are designed from a similar vein.
Better pics than usual. The little Pentax lenses seem to be a great job but no surprises as they made good gear.
Flare resistance seems really good too, I wonder did they use SMC coatings on 110 lenses?
My cousin had rich parents (my aunt and uncle) and they bought him a Pentax 110 system, I remember he had it in 1982 when he was about 10/11. He went on to be a pro photographer and now teaches photography.
Is there any way to simulate the aperture which was built into the 110 bodies so that the lenses can be effectively stopped down for use on digital? I suspect that image quality would increase significantly if there were a way to stop them down to f/4 or /5.6, and they'd still let enough light through to be useable.
If delving into old/adapted lenses is truly an adventure, you have to play with the Zeiss Jena series of glass. I loved using it on a lot of different bodies, but I suspect that audiences would most appreciate its pairing with a Fuji body.
Pure enjoyment on a cold and lazy Sunday afternoon... and I always learn something new when I watch the Chris & Jordon show :D I also appreciated many of the technical DIY'ers who have added interesting facts to the comments below... and I'm sure there will be more. Thanks Chris/Jordon... keep up the good work!
What I think about a MFT Pentax? Well, actually I have been thinking that would be a quite logical move with their long history of offering performance in a small package. If they were to bring something like the ME or the MX in MFT, that would be awesome! I'd trust them to bring on some fine lenses too. And compared to other options to complement the SLR sales, it would be a pretty low risk one.
Adapted lenses I'd like to see revolve around what AF is actually possible through adapters. I know you don't want to hit some of the more common adapters in favor of something "wacky" but knowing if there are any actually workable non-native AF choices for that T4 you were shooting with would be cool.
Interesting and fun, thanks. If the economy goes the way I expect, articles on stuff that's inexpensive but fun might be a good idea.
There used to be much more of this; using window screen to make star effects, fisheye lenses made from door peepholes, cheap lenses used with T adapters, old view camera lenses, etc. Stuff like Lens Baby used to be priced appropriately, and it was fun to experiment with.
I enjoyed the video. But I think it's only fair (to the now-mostly-retired Pentax engineers who designed this system), to emphasize a point that only a few others are making:
In this experiment, the lenses are being used in a way never intended. Not "wide open" but beyond that. They're really wider than f/2/8 but were designed to be used with the Auto 110 body's built-in shutter/stop that controls the opening. Optically, it's no fair to go without the stop that makes them f/2.8 as engraved.
If you went inside a modern lens and removed the aperture mechanism including associated rings and baffles, you'd be shooting through edges of the elements and the sharpness would take a noticeable hit. I think that's part of the story here.
Though perhaps not razor-sharp, I think their reputation is going to suffer unfairly because of these stop-less adapters on digital cameras. By adding various stops, you'd find the sharpness is better at actual f/2.8, probably much better at f/4 to f/5.6.
I used the Auto 110 lenses for a while and found that an adapter with aperture could be created from a broken camera. Here is one adapter that utilizes the original aperture/shutter of the camera, it can be stopped won manually (little lever on the side) https://www.flickr.com/gp/gnarlydog/44bQ6B The speckled highlights however are weird (square balls) therefore I retrofitted some lenses (50mm and 70mm) with a round aperture iris: https://www.flickr.com/gp/gnarlydog/mG4t6e The 70mm is actually a rather good lens: the bokeh is old school with a hint of swirl and the render is very decent. It shines for portraits more than most modern lenses (especially zooms). The 50mm wide open doesn't work that well at infinity but at 10 m is good.
I have the whole set of these Pentax auto 110 lenses that I got for cheap years ago. I only had one native lens at the time so these and other dirt cheap legacy glass seemed attractive. I mounted them on the Panasonic GF-1 and the results were okay optically. They look comically cute being dwarfed even by the m43 bodies. Eventually however I just decided to go with native lenses.
I contemplated grabbing a Pentax Q. With the 70mm would make 385mm or 329mm on the Q7. Alas, I think I would get better photos if I just grabbed a Stylus 1 which is a 28-300mm and similar sensor.
I didn't really understand the appeal of interchanageble lens 110 and don't get why you would want to use fixed aperature lenses on digital... With so many other options..?
A neighbor had the Pentax 110 and in the late 1990's he used it one last time and commented that the photos looked better than when the camera was new and he was correct, the film got better so the photos were better.
I have a set of these lenses along with the camera, and I use them on micro four thirds. I also have the magnetic aperture disks.
f/2.8 is what they would do with the Pentax 110 camera's dual internal aperture - some of these lenses measure all the way down to f/2.0 in the real world.
Yes, Pentax should make a digital 110. Pentax should make a micro four thirds camera. This will never happen though, since Pentax has trouble making DSLRs and has tried twice already with mirrorless.
I saw the video and let myself encourage to give DPR a suggestion for a future test: Quailty vs weight optimization. What system, sensor size and lens will give the best image quality per kg equipment. Assume same FoV, lighting, shutter speed and so on.
m4/3 with a f/1,4 lens vs a FF camera with a f/2,8 lens and so on.
Lately I've come to realize color science is more important that a bit more noise or a little less DR. And some m43 cameras hit above their weight anyway. We talk about trying to eliminate noise, but keep secret how much time we take to fix bad colors, or create color profiles for every scenario. I really appreciate Canon, Olympus and Fujifilm that give us such great looking stills SOOC, and RAW files that default to such pleasing colors.
I really appreciated the fact that the Fujifilm X-T4 was used to shoot this episode (presumably intentionally) giving us an opportunity to further evaluate the performance of the newly introduced IBIS system and video AF. More valuable even than the initial review of the X-T4 in this matter...
The same applies to a previous sponsored article here at DPReview (exploring creativity with the X Pro 3, that did not allow for comments) which in fact I enjoyed mostly as a showcase of the wonderful video capabilities of the X-T3 that was used to film that video.
I have to say that, colour in this video filmed with the X-T4, in my personal opinion, looks to be so much more natural than previous videos shot with the Panasonic SH1. Just a personal opinion of course. Therefore, I would greatly appreciate a video comparison of your take on video colour science of various companies and models of hybrid cameras currently in the market.
As always you guys make awesome videos, and this one only shows how much fun you can have using those fully manual lenses even in an non cooperating landscape.
One great advantage of mirrorless systems is this ability to use old lenses full of imperfections but with magical rendering.
While we're on the subject of "ancient" lenses that are both tiny and still gorgeous today, let's not forget the old Zuiko 200mm f/5, a truly "pocket" sized 200mm lens if ever there was one. If you're looking to "get to 400mm" on your fancy new E-M1 mk3, and don't mind manual focus but want insane sharpness at f/5-8 before diffraction gets too nasty, then that's a unicorn of a lens.
I rediscovered my several Zuiko lenses from various OM SLR and adapted them to Sony A7 with low expectations. I was pleasantly surprised at the quality, including resolution. And as you say, they are lightweight (not having to bother with focus motor, iris connection , etc.) and solidly built to last.
I recently used the Zuiko 200mm f/5 on the A7R3 on a 4-night backpacking trip where weight was a major concern. It was the sharpest landscape photography lens I've ever tested that hits 200mm. Knock it to ~f/8 and WOW... Even at 42 MP and no AA filter, that lens is utterly bonkers sharp. I'm now very curious to try some other Zuiko lenses (Maybe a ~85-105mm?) that could possibly save even more weight for my ultra-light full-frame travel needs...
Pentax could be an interesting addition to m43, particularly if they made bodies incorporating their 4-shot whole-pixel-shift function - which neither Olympus nor Panasonic do (why?).
These lenses belong firmly in the past though. They are terrible.
@cosinaphile - they are fixed-aperture f/2.8 lenses. All shots are at f/2.8. Off-axis the images quality is awful, and the bokeh in the one shot where that is relevant is nasty.
the 110 cameras had a 2 piece aperture baffle in the camera that acted to discard the peripheral aspect of these 2.8 optics and provide stopping down
they are better than this in practice when used as intended which means with an aperture baffle .... i use one in my adapters .... they are sharp enough for an 8x10 or 11x 14 remember these are being mounted on 10 dollar sweat shop adapters... seeking the fun of using these gems rather than perfection and sterility of computer designed 50mm lenses the size of a beer stein is the key
The DJI Air 2S is exactly what many drone enthusiasts have been asking for: a consumerdrone with a 1"-type camera sensor that's budget-friendly. Does it live up to the hype? In our opinion, yes.
DxO has just released PureRaw, a simple, standalone program that can automatically apply its high-quality lens corrections and impressive noise-reduction algorithms to your Raw files, and then pass those Raw files off to your favorite editing app. We're pretty impressed by it – find out why in our review.
The Fujifilm Fujinon XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR is a very versatile, compact telephoto zoom lens. But how does it perform? Read our review to find out.
The X-E4 is going to make a lot of photographers happy, especially those craving a near-pocket-size X-mount body with Fujifilm's latest IQ performance.
In our latest software shootout, we pit Adobe's Camera Raw against Capture One Express Fujifilm, included for free with every Fujifilm camera. Can you get all you need with the free option? For a lot of people, it looks like the answer could be yes.
If you want a camera that you can pick up and use without having to page through the manual first, then this guide is for you. We've selected seven cameras ranging from compacts to full-frame, all of which are easy to operate.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with friends or loved-ones in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
If you're looking for a high-quality camera, you don't need to spend a ton of cash, nor do you need to buy the latest and greatest new product on the market. In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that might be a bit older but still offer a lot of bang for the buck.
Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media.
Whether you make a living out of taking professional portraits, or are the weekend warrior who knows their way around flashes and reflectors, you'll want a camera with high resolution, exceptional autofocus and a good selection of portrait prime lenses. Click through to see our picks.
Conservationist and photographer Donal Boyd and filmmaker Frank Nieuwenhuis visited the ongoing volcanic eruption on the Reykjanes Peninsula in Iceland, where he captured beautiful visuals of the eruption.
We took the Panasonic Lumix DC-G100 to the Bay Area and put it in the hands of commercial and fashion photographer Robert Silver to see what it can do.
Cosina adds to its Voigtlander Vintage Line series with its new 28mm F2 Ultron lenses, which come in two models — Type I and Type II — with different focus ring styles.
Sony's latest FX3 has a lot in common with the a7S III on the inside, but we've got our hands on one to show just how different it is on the outside – take a look.
The DJI Air 2S is exactly what many drone enthusiasts have been asking for: a consumerdrone with a 1"-type camera sensor that's budget-friendly. Does it live up to the hype? In our opinion, yes.
The winners of the Professional, Open, Student and Youth categories of the Sony World Photography Awards have been announced, showing some exceptional projects and single images.
Canon has announced two new telephoto prime lenses for the RF mount: the RF 400mm F2.8L IS USM and 600mm F4L IS USM. Click through for a closer look at these two new telephoto options for RF.
From the stately twin-lens reflex to the timeless view camera, here are some of the less common film camera types still kicking around on the used market.
Micro Four Thirds users can now enjoy the Speedmaster 35mm F0.95 Mark II manual lens that was previously limited to Canon EF-M, Fujifilm X and Sony E mount camera systems.
Hasselblad Masters contest opens to professional photographers, with a dozen medium format mirrorless cameras up for grabs. And you don't need to shoot on a 'blad to enter!
Fujifilm's latest prime, the XF 18mm F1.4 R LM WR, is a solidly built lens that we've really enjoyed shooting with. It's also a big departure from Fujifilm's previous 18mm F2 prime lens – get a sense of how it handles right here.
The new Fujifilm XF 18mm F1.4 R LM WR provides a 27mm-equivalent focal length for Fujifilm's X-mount cameras. Find out why Chris and Jordan like this fast, sharp 18mm lens.
We've been shooting with a pre-production copy of Fujifilm's new XF 18mm F1.4 R LM WR lens for a few days, which offers a 27mm full-frame equivalent field of view, and optically, we're impressed.
Fujifilm has announced its lightweight (370g/13oz) XF 18mm F1.4 R LM WR wide-angle prime. This 27mm-equivalent lens offers numerous special elements and a linear focus motor, and is also weather-sealed.
DxO has just released PureRaw, a simple, standalone program that can automatically apply its high-quality lens corrections and impressive noise-reduction algorithms to your Raw files, and then pass those Raw files off to your favorite editing app. We're pretty impressed by it – find out why in our review.
Canon has just announced a native RF-mount contemporary to its popular EF 100mm F2.8L Macro lens. The RF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM is an all-new design, and we've been digging into its feature set. Click through to learn more.
Sony's Xperia 1 and 5 Mark III smartphones introduce a variable 70-105mm telephoto optic, 120Hz OLED displays, and are the first cameras ever to shoot 20 fps with temporal noise reduction. Read on for an in-depth look.
Canon has just announced the development of what will be the highest-speed RF-mount camera yet, the EOS R3. It looks like a really interesting camera, but the R3 also points toward something else coming in the future; something even more capable. Here's what we know.
In today's episode of DPReview TV, Chris and Jordan answer the question everyone is asking: what do they think about Canon's EOS R3 development announcement?
Canon's new RF 100mm F2.8L IS USM offers a minimum focus distance of 26cm (10"), up to 8 stops of shake reduction, and the ability to adjust bokeh and softness by turning its 'spherical aberration' dial.
Canon has announced two new super-telephoto primes for RF-mount: the 400mm F2.8L IS USM and 600mm F4L IS USM. Both lenses share the same optics as their EF-mount counterparts, and will arrive in July priced at $12,000 and $13,000, respectively.
Canon has announced that it is developing the EOS R3, a high-end full-frame mirrorless camera. It will feature a Stacked CMOS Dual Pixel sensor and be able to shoot at up to 30 fps.
Comments